In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

RT journalist Natalya Arkhiptseva wasn’t thrilled about some drunk dude’s sexual advances. And got shot as the result.

This is a guest-post. I’d like to thank Jill & Cara for giving me the green light.

This is Natalya Arkhiptseva. She works at Russia Today. In the same building as I do (I work for The Moscow News, which is owned by RIA Novosti, and RT and RIA are neighbours).

On October 9, Natalya decided to meet up with her girlfriends downtown, at Prado Cafe. I’ve never been to Prado, but from what I understand, it’s a fashionable restaurant. “The place has pathos” – as the Russian saying goes.

Natalya was the first of her group to get to Prado. She asked the hostess to take her upstairs. Only one other table upstairs was occupied. Two men and a woman was sitting there. As Natalya passed by the table, one of the men said drunkenly – “Look at that ass walking by.”

I’ve tried to put myself in Natalya’s place, and in doing so, I realize that my reaction to that comment would have been pretty similar.

What Natalya did is that she turned around and asked the man if he was talking to her. “So what?” He slurred. “So what?”

The hostess asked Natalya if she would like security to be called. Natalya replied in the affirmative.

At this point, the other man sitting at the table told Natalya, “bitch, I’ll make you dance,” whipped out a gun, and shot her in the foot. (The cops initially said that it was a “traumatic pistol” – one of those things that is meant to be used in self-defense, as opposed to a lethal weapon. However, the bullet that was taken out of Natalya’s foot was a metal bullet. So it could have been a modified weapon. This is important when it comes to sentencing.)

Right now, you’re probably sitting there thinking that this couldn’t get any worse. Except that it kind of does.

Staff and security who work at Moscow’s posher restaurants are incredibly attuned to the caste system that exists in Russian society. They were instantly able to determine that a) Drunk Guy With Gun is an Important Person and b) Natalya’s just some lowly journalist, and acted accordingly.

Natalya received no help. Her friends had to call her an ambulance. While she waited for an ambulance, in a state of shock, the man who initially insulted her was allowed to go up to her and tell her how HILARIOUS it was to see her get shot. When the ambulance arrived, a waiter demanded that Natalya be given first aid outside, because, and I quote “people are eating here” and who wants to have their Important Clientele be squicked out by the sight blood? According to Natalya, the staff at Prado went as far as give false statements to the police.

The man who shot Natalya is businessman Sergei Virolainen, executive director of Saigon, a company that specializes in plumbing repairs [insert appropriate metaphor here]. Society journalist Bozhena Rynska, who was the first to break this story, ON HER BLOG (no one was interested in what happened to Natalya at first), reported that Virolainen is the nephew of a retired Saint Petersburg politician – and this news appears to be correct. As I mentioned in my story about this for MN, there’s ample evidence to suggest that Virolainen believed, and continues to believe, that his money and connections put him above the law.

I sincerely hope that he is swiftly disabused of this notion. I’m not going to go as far as say that it would be a good thing if he is also swiftly seized by a group of maladjusted goblins and repeatedly dunked head-first into a public toilet somewhere in the vicinity of Lyublino (a particularly rough neighbourhood in southeast Moscow) for at least a week or so – but I will say that should such a scenario or one similar to it take place, I probably won’t be too upset on Virolainen’s behalf.

Shockingly, Natalya’s story is not shocking. Virolainen’s behaviour is not shocking. The alleged behaviour of Prado’s staff is not shocking. I’ll go as far as say that the only reason we even heard about this incident has to do with the fact that Natalya is a journalist – and someone who will not be content with hush money.

I have bad stories of sexual harassment – in Moscow and elsewhere – as many of us do. What they all have in common is the same old notion of Woman as Public Property. A woman who is out alone, or else surrounded by people who are not easily identifiable as her bodyguards, a woman who’s wearing something a little more revealing than a spacesuit, a woman who forgot her grenade-launcher and her loyal pack of psychologically unstable Bull Terriers at home is obviously asking for someone to remind her of her place. Or, you know, just go ahead and shoot her – so that she doesn’t get any funny ideas about her possible status as a human being.

What makes sexual harassment by a Rich Dude sometimes worse is the fact that there is more of a chance of him getting away with it. I mean, I’m telling you, it was bad when a guy in an old, Soviet-made Lada drove alongside the pavement and yelled disgusting things at me as I tried to walk home one night – but if it had been a guy in a Bentley, I would have been way more scared. Society would have us believe that guys in Bentleys are just waiting for their chance to make us their Cinderellas – when the reality is a little more prosaic.

Natalya Arkhiptseva plans to sue Prado – and will insist that Sergei Virolainen be punished to the full extent of the law. There will be huge pressure on her to drop this entire thing, of course. The fact that Virolainen didn’t even get to spend the night in jail after doing what he did sort of speaks for itself. But I hope she fights the good fight – and I hope that all of us continue to support her in any way that we can.

Many people have already begun asking the same stupid question that always comes up when an incident like this occurs – “But what could have been done to avoid it?” I’m here to tell you that nothing, absolutely nothing could have been done to avoid it. Natalya was not in control of the situation from the start. She responded honourably (I used to not be a big fan of the word “honour,” but it’s been growing on me as of late). She was brave, and continues to be brave.

And I wouldn’t want people reading this to dismiss the incident as “something that happened in crazy old Russia, so it’s none of my concern,” because the first thing I thought of when I read about it was that one time a girl I knew got pistol-whipped in one of those “upscale” Miami clubs for having the temerity to complain when a guy began to grope her. Guy in question was never even arrested or prosecuted. Staff allowed him to leave by the back door while she lay bleeding on the floor.

Any one of us could have been that girl. Any one of us could have been Natalya Arkhiptseva.


29 thoughts on RT journalist Natalya Arkhiptseva wasn’t thrilled about some drunk dude’s sexual advances. And got shot as the result.

  1. So if you don’t get shot in Russia just for being a journalist, you’ll get shot for being female.

    I’m sorry, I know you don’t want this to be a tongue-clucking thing about Russia, but every time I read about something like this going on over there I get discouraged. I had such high hopes after Communism fell.

  2. I’m not really surprised. Russia is a scary place lately, in terms of lawlessness.

    And it’s true that we can’t judge what she did. These guys are the classic bullies, like a gang leader or mob boss. Sometimes being a polite supplicant (“Oh sir, I’m sorry, I didn’t recognize you, no need to call security, I’ll be leaving now!”) works. Then again, sometimes it gets you tagged as an easy mark, which is dangerous in its own right. Similarly, sometimes escalating will get them to back off, and sometimes (as here) it backfires.

    But there’s no way to know in advance, and it’s not the victim’s fault either way.

  3. A bully is a bully is a bully. The best way to “prevent” incidences like this is to prove to people, quickly and efficiently, bullying of any kind will not be tolerated. It doesn’t matter if you steal lunch money, call someone hateful homophobic words, or make disgusting comments about someone’s body, this kind of shit has consequences. And SHOOTING someone should definitely have consequences!!

  4. Please. Do you think this crap only happens in post-Soviet Russia? Do you even read the newspapers from other countries? This happens everywhere – whether as street harassment, caning, clothing-policing, rape, assault, spousal abuse, murder – how many stories in every U.S. paper talk about some man killing his (ex) girlfriend or (ex) wife? Every friggin’ day.

    Pretending this happens only elsewhere will not make you safer. It’s depressing as hell, but as a woman you are NOT safe. Anywhere.

  5. I was going to say that five years isn’t enough, but that didn’t sound right, and then I realized it wasn’t that it isn’t enough–it’s that it’s the wrong kind of punishment.

    He should be shot in the foot after someone attempts to publically humiliate him.

    I’m not a fan of lawsuits, but she should sue him for her medical bills. And anything she possibly can.

  6. Of course, ideally even more should happen. Penalties can’t just equal the crime so that they simply “cancel each other out” and makes things worth it. They have to be greater, they have to be preventive.

    I like the toilet idea.

  7. Oh, and btw, it was either not a rubber bullet, or the weapon was modified somehow, methinks. Bozhena Rynska posted pictures of Natalya’s blood-stained boot, and I think it’s fairly obvious that there was no way this was caused by a simple “traumatic weapon” (TRIGGER WARNING – don’t click if you think that you may be distrubed):

    Picture.

    Perhaps weapons experts will disagree. If we have any in the house, I’d love to hear from them.

  8. Bitter Scribe: I had such high hopes after Communism fell.

    American fantasies about Evil Communism never cease to amaze me.

    Sorry, that’s kind of a sidetrack, but then so is Bitter Scribe’s comment.

    tinfoil hattie: Pretending this happens only elsewhere will not make you safer. It’s depressing as hell, but as a woman you are NOT safe. Anywhere.

    YES.

    That’s why all of these “Women’s Safety Tips” lists are so effin’ outrageous – aiming the blame at the victims, not the perpetrators.

    Hope this guy ends up in jail. Natalya Arkhiptseva is a woman of valor.

  9. I had such high hopes after Communism fell.

    oh come on, because communism got people shot in the feet all the time?! and because some people think communism was more misogynist than capitalism is? please… in any case, this story is horrible and infuriating, and i hope this guy (and all his helpers) do have a head-in-toilet-experience, if only metaphorically.

  10. Bitter Scribe: I had such high hopes after Communism fell.

    Please. Guys yell shit at me all the time while I’m waiting for the bus. (Any woman out of the kitchen is a whore, amiright?) I got sick of it and after some idiot in a Jeep asked me if I wanted to blow him, I gave him the finger. He responded by throwing an empty beer bottle at me.

    Every day, every country, any woman. Don’t forget it.

  11. That is scary. And you’re right – it could have happened to any woman, anywhere. Until we can somehow disabuse society of the notion that women are nothing more than props, like chairs, tables, or blankets, there’s not going to be any way to prevent further crap like this from happening.

  12. And guys wonder why women “lead them on” and are afraid to turn them down?

    Hell, except for the Russian power dynamics, this COULD happen in America or anywhere else. Any time, any second.

  13. @Natalie Antonova

    First of all, this is just my opinion, I am not a professional, etc, etc.

    Since she seems to be shot at almost point-blank range, it doesn’t seem improbable that a rubber bullet could go through 2 layers of leather. However, there have been documented cases of “non-lethal” ammo, like beanbags or rubber bullets, killing people. This usually happens when the projectile hits a person in the chest, in a gap between two ribs, and then penetrates the flesh and punctures and collapses the lung. (It’s also theoretically possible that it could hit the heart, aorta, liver, kidney, etc, and cause internal hemorrhaging). In addition, almost ANY item, if propelled with sufficient force or speed, can kill a person if it hits the wrong spot on their body.

    To summarize, just from looking at the photo of the boot and without a photo of the wound or any other information, it could have been a rubber bullet, could have been a metal bullet, could have even been a ballpoint pen if someone was aggressive enough.

  14. it could have been a rubber bullet, could have been a metal bullet, could have even been a ballpoint pen if someone was aggressive enough.

    Thank you.

    What’s infuriating about the hooliganism charge is that it almost makes it seem as though he didn’t mean to shoot her. Which he did.

    I do hope that Natalya proceeds with her suit against the restaurant and against the shooter, and I also hope she doesn’t mysteriously disappear or die.

    I doubt she will. It’s not the 1990’s anymore, and she has powerful people on her side, taking an active interest in what happened. When this sort of thing happens to a waitress, on the other hand, no one ever hears about it and very few people give a crap. It’s a class issue that works both ways, because plenty of people will say that “oh, working in a fashionable place like that – what was she thinking? Everyone KNOWS what sort of spoiled, entitled, scary people gather there.”

  15. “American fantasies about Evil Communism never cease to amaze me.”

    “oh come on, because communism got people shot in the feet all the time?! and because some people think communism was more misogynist than capitalism is?”

    I thought the communist comment was in reference to the lawlessness of the whole country post liberation, not to communism being the source of sexism.

    However, there is a school of feminist thought that positions capitalism as the root of sexism. I’ve heard similar expressions to that effect on this blog so its unclear why communism should be free from analysis. Why does the sexism existing within capitalist societies get linked to the larger system while the mere thought of holding communist regimes regimes responsible is met with gobsmacked dismissal?

    Perhaps that’s why we need a right-wing feminism. If we narrow down who can be a feminist to only left of center thinkers then whole modes of oppression go Scot free. On a similar note, there are some rumblings on the right-wing to bring critical race theory to lefty regimes.

    The lowered threshold of what is considered racist, like say the idea of disparate impact, would completely redefine the Ukrainian famine and Mao’s cultural revolution.

  16. “Right-wing feminism”

    Snarky response: But I’m not ready to go back to the kitchen!

    Serious response: I tend to think not holding any type of regime responsible for social misdeeds is wrong– and I’m not sure that being “leftist” means you are going to give non-capitalist societies a free pass. Communist or capitalist, social wrongs are social wrongs. That being said, the dismissive attitude (when taken at face value, add a little sarcasm and it changes completely) that I perceive in the initial comment was uncalled for– no commentary, just a little backhanded dig. Economic bullying isn’t discussion.
    I would also be curious what else you’re adding to this “right-wing feminism”….? I don’t think homophobia and anti-choice doctrine will fit in with the fight for civil rights and health care… But then again, perhaps I am being too harsh on this right-wing of yours…

  17. Natalia, thank you for sharing this with us. I’m glad Natalya is being brave about it.

    Oh and this could happen anywhere. Living in a country with a rape conviction rate of 6%, I cannot point the finger at other countries.

  18. The combination of sexual abuse and alcohol abuse is a dangerous duo. And in Russia the extent to which both exist in Moscow environs is rampant.

    To quote Pravda, the Russian news agency, Russia is “a country where booze is considered something akin to the second national currency” and the rapidly increasing alcohol abuse is a “nation-wide calamity.”

    The recent record-breaking heat wave in Russia provides a good example of what happens. Long before the heatwave was over, more than 1200 russians — most drunk — drowned trying to escape the heat:

    http://www.ethicsoup.com/2010/07/1200-russians-most-drunk-have-drowned-trying-to-escape-current-heat-wave.html

  19. There’s no such thing as “Pravda news agency”, Sharon. There’s the Pravda.ru portal and Komsomolskaya Pravda.

    Alcoholism levels have kept pretty steady in Russia – I’m not sure where it is that anyone’s getting the statistic that they are rampantly on the rise. WHO statistics suggest that Russians, on the average, consume less alcohol than the Brits and Germans, for example. Comparing actual drinking cultures is far more interesting, but you don’t seem keen to do that in your post.

    The stereotype of “those drunk Russians” is actually not at all helpful when discussing what happened to Natalya Arkhiptseva – downtown Moscow’s rampant VIP syndrome is a much bigger problem, imho.

    Also, “hilarious” post on drowning deaths in Russia over the summer. Yes, it sure is amusing, when people wind up dead – especially when it comes to the elderly, many of whom passed away during the heatwave for natural reasons, but could have stuck around longer had it not happened. Brava.

  20. I am so pissed that even though Natalia explicitly said she didn’t want people to dismiss this as “something that happened in crazy old Russia,” the comment thread turned into a horrible mess of exactly that: “Oh, well, Russia — you know the terrifying stuff that happens over THERE.” This is not a place to point fingers and pontificate about the oh-so exotic places far, far away. As for communism, capitalism — seriously, people, they’re not actually opposites of each other, and sexism exists in both systems.

Comments are currently closed.