In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Feminism Killed Natalee Holloway

Is there anything these people can’t blame feminism for?

Because of politically-correct feminist imperatives, girls now know more about sex but less about the opposite sex. There was a time when girls were told that boys were vastly different from them, possessing stronger libidos and bodies. Girls were taught to avoid placing themselves in compromising situations; they were armed with the facts upon which good judgement rested and safety depended.

Now, though, such counsel is sacrilege. Girls’ minds are filled with notions of the sameness of the sexes, with its corollary that they can go where their sisters of yore feared to tread. Why, God forbid that we should tell them that, like it or not, they are the more vulnerable sex, and that this fact of life should inform their thinking.

Not that I’m laboring under the illusion that modern girls are all sugar and spice and everything nice. Owing to feminism, which liberated the fairer sex from common-sense, morality, restraint, and chastity, quasi-harlotry now infects much of contemporary womanhood. A lady close to my heart said it best: “Forty years ago you knew who the bad girls were; now you know who the good girls are.” And now we have a whole generation of girls-gone-wild.

Because knowing about sex and believing that you have the right to go out alone is what’ll rape and/or kill you. Not, you know, actual rapists and murderers.

But equal with feminism is bad parenting — you know, the people who would let their daughters (and it’s just daughers) go on “hedonistic” vacations to Spanish-speaking countries.

Let’s be blunt, one way a daughter could frame this is, “Hey, Mom and Dad, can I go to Cancun for spring break (or to celebrate, or some other occasion)?” But translated that often means, “Hey, Mom and Dad, can I go to Cancun, where I’ll most likely have sex with some libidinous boy you don’t know from Adam – maybe even with lots of boys – drink, smoke, and perhaps even do drugs?” That sounds crazy but is, in essence, accurate. Crazier still is that the parents’ answer is often “yes.”

Now, I’m not a big fan of the entitlement issues that come along with kids who think they “deserve” an exotic vacation for high school graduation or for simply existing. But that aside, at some point parents have to evaluate whether or not they trust their kids, and they have to let their children grow up and make their own decisions. Were I a parent, would I let my 15-year-old go to Aruba alone? Probably not. But do I hope that I’ll know my 18-year-old well enough to be able to reasonably evaluate whether or not they’ll go on a sex-and-drugs spree in a foreign country.

The “girls gone wild” culture is, as far as I can tell, a non-existant part of the majority of young women’s personal experiences, and to be honest I’m sick of every female in my generation being associated with it. Young women are not all running amok flashing our breasts for beads and enticing innocent high school boys into having sex with us. Those of us who do engage in certain behaviors that this author would criticize — sexual performance to please a male audience, etc — do so as a response to a lot of complicated social factors, and it’s over-simplistic to just call those women heathen sluts and assume that their experiences are universal for young women. Hell, I went to Mexico for spring break last year with six other people, and it wasn’t exactly an exercise in unrestrained hedonism — we were in bed by midnight every night, and woke up by 9am (we did drink Pacifico and pina coladas in the pool all day, but that’s about as wild as it got). I’m sure there were plenty of people there who were a lot crazier than we were, and that’s fine — but just because their experience is more visible doesn’t make it more common.

Of course, what no one seems to be pointing out is that, even if we assume that “girls gone wild” are everywhere, it’s men who are videotaping them, encouraging them to behave a certain way, rewarding sexualized and male-pleasing behavior, and making money off of them. Feminism has never said, “You go, girls! Get naked for that guy and let him make millions off your ass!” We just see the dishonesty in slut-shaming and pinning all the blame on women.


22 thoughts on Feminism Killed Natalee Holloway

  1. Yes, yes, yes! Right on, Jill. Your last paragraph nails it perfectly, especially the role of men in encouraging and rewarding the behavior.

  2. Just had use this as a little writing exercise and sent an email to Mr. Duke, as follows:

    Mr. Duke:

    I just read your article and I found it disturbing. While it is certainly a tragedy when a fine young white woman is murdered in some savage foreign land, I am more concerned about this:

    “Owing to feminism, which liberated the fairer sex from common-sense, morality, restraint, and chastity, quasi-harlotry now infects much of contemporary womanhood.”

    How the hell did this happen!

    I mean it was not so long ago that the black man was the biggest threat to the Godly purity of the white woman. I mean I thought it was common knowledge that the bucks would sneak into a white man’s house and rob his wife (white) of her common-sense, morality, restraint, and chastity thereby condemning her to a life of shame and whoredom.

    Now, I know us white men who are experienced in the ways of world have raised Hue and Cry about the general sexual depravity of blacks and now it appears that them femi-nazi need to be added to the list. (painted with the same brush as it were) wink, wink.

    I am glad to be educated on this topic by you sir.

    One further question….does this mean we get to start lynching them there feminists now?

    P. S. You related to David by any chance?

    P.P.S. Uh, that wink, wink up above? Just so you understand, I was not making a homosexual pass in any way. Okay?

    Yours in conservative Christian fellowship and brotherhood

    Y’all have a good day now ya hear.

    Ernest Augustus Outis

  3. Because of politically-correct feminist imperatives, girls now know more about sex but less about the opposite sex. There was a time when girls were told that boys were vastly different from them, possessing stronger libidos and bodies. Girls were taught to avoid placing themselves in compromising situations; they were armed with the facts upon which good judgement rested and safety depended.

    So the reason Natalee Holloway died/disappeared is not because someone killed or kidnapped her, but because she was stupid for being female and travelling to Aruba? Being young and female and without a male escort makes it OK for men to kidnap, rape or kill you?

    What revolting, disgusting victim-blaming horseshit.

  4. “girls gone wild” are everywhere!”

    Really, just where the hell are these women, I live in a student getto in a collage and I never get to see ny of this, what am I doing wrong? Come one people help me out!!!! 🙂

  5. Why, God forbid that we should tell them that, like it or not, they are the more vulnerable sex, and that this fact of life should inform their thinking.

    So by virtue of being female, I should just be afraid? No sense in blaming the actual perpetrators. Let’s just look at all men with fear, apprehension, and skepticism.

    I can acknowledge that terrible things (assult, rape, murder) happen in the world and that I should be aware of these risks without cringing and fretting “oh, woe is me, the helpless vulnerable woman!” It’s not like only women are ever the victims of violent crime.

  6. Nono! She was an innocent dupe! She was swindled by the corrupting ideology of Feminism! If she did it of her own free will, she could be blamed, of coures….. But it’s actually Feminism’s fault!

    And man, the Straw-feminist (to borrow Amanda’s term) keep getting crazier. Apperently feminists aren’t allowed to teach their daughters about rape and how to avoid it? If fucking anytihng, they’re teaching their daughters more effectively.

  7. Your last paragraph nails it perfectly, especially the role of men in encouraging and rewarding the behavior.

    Ah, but the get-out-of-moral-responsibility gene is on the Y chromosome, apparently.

    I find the common charge against StrawFeminism that it teaches the “sameness of the sexes”, while the anti-feminist claim that everyone of the same sex is exactly the same.

  8. Ah, but the get-out-of-moral-responsibility gene is on the Y chromosome, apparently.

    Why, no. I think women should take just as much responsibility for the rapes they commit.

  9. The victim blaming in the Holloway case just keeps snowballing.

    It started even when she went missing when she was described as *oh no!* wearing a *gasp* low-cut top.

  10. Yup Blame the victim, especially if she is a pretty girl. Don’t balme the monster sickos that murdered here. Of course it is not just men that are blaming the victim it’s women.

  11. Let’s just look at all men with fear, apprehension, and skepticism.

    Reminds me of a conversation I once had with an anti-feminist man. I have this policy. I don’t invite men I don’t know well up to my apartment alone unless I’m willing to have sex with them. Seems rather common sense to me. Know what reaction I got from him? “That’s not fair! You’re treating all men like they’re potential rapists.” Really, sometimes you just can’t win.

  12. But—-I thought feminists hated sex and were all lesbians? Which is it? (Because being lesbian means you hate sex, somehow, to a wingnut. I guess if homosexuality is a choice, then being lesbian means you’ve chosen to hate men.)

    You know, I bet I can tell exactly what this columnist thinks about women.

  13. Ya know what really kills me? We don’t know what happened to Holloway. She could have gone off with those three guys and accidentally OD’d. She could have been the victim of a hit and run. She could have slipped and fallen and hurt herself/killed herself. She could have been murdered and/or raped. But we don’t know.

    Let’s be blunt, one way a daughter could frame this is, “Hey, Mom and Dad, can I go to Cancun for spring break (or to celebrate, or some other occasion)?” But translated that often means, “Hey, Mom and Dad, can I go to Cancun, where I’ll most likely have sex with some libidinous boy you don’t know from Adam – maybe even with lots of boys – drink, smoke, and perhaps even do drugs?” That sounds crazy but is, in essence, accurate. Crazier still is that the parents’ answer is often “yes.”

    Okay, listen up. All of you maidens of purity morons out there get it straight–if you expect us to control our behavior, start applying the same standards to guys. The day y’all start telling guys like Spur Posse that they’re acting like skank dogs and that no one would want them, that they should show modesty and restraint, and all that–with the same amount of vehemence and energy (and press) as you do us lowly females, is the day I’ll consider taking you seriously. Til then, just shut it.

  14. “quasi-harlotry now infects much of contemporary womanhood. ”

    That’s what I like about the right wing. They make my life sound so damn glamorous.

    (unless “quasi-harlotry” now means “staying at the office until after 9 most nights” and no one told me)

  15. Lesley… I like that policy. Seriously, I think it makes a lot of sense.
    As far as the rest of this goes, as the mother of a little girl it’s something I struggle with a lot. I don’t want my daughter to live in fear and terror of being raped. At the same time, I don’t want her to put herself in a position where she makes herself a victim. Does it make me a bad feminist to say to my daughter, it’s probably not a good idea to walk after dark by yourself, drink until you pass out at a college party, etc… It might, I don’t know. There has to be a balance between the ideal (that a woman should be able to walk down the sidewalk after dark by herself without fear of rape) and the reality (often this is not the case). I think we can safely teach our daughters to be feminists who are proud of themselves and their genders without encouraging irresponsible, dangerous behavior.

  16. Why, God forbid that we should tell them that, like it or not, they are the more vulnerable sex, and that this fact of life should inform their thinking.

    Dang, I thought that was working up to be a give-your-girl-a-gun column.

  17. Sheelzebub:
    You rock — that was a fantastic post that verbalized accurately all of the half-formed ideas that were lurking in my head. Well put!

    Julie:
    I don’t think making your daughter aware of the dangers that are out there and how to minimize her risks is a bad idea. What is a bad idea is instilling the idea that following the right rules *automatically* protects her from all of the bad things out there, implying that if something bad happens to her, it is her fault for not following some “rule”. I think that when she is old enough to understand it, you might want to have the “bad things sometimes happen even if you take all the precautions in the world” talk, and reassure her that if something bad (like rape, or assault, or other abuse) happens, it’s NOT HER FAULT. How to actually go about that is beyond me. (I think I’m glad I don’t have children of either sex at this point.)

    Leslie:
    Did you mention to this guy that women basically HAVE TO think this way to (more or less) protect ourselves? That there are just too many men who will press an advantage given the right circumstances? And that some of the wouldn’t even consider it to be rape? Ooooh — I think he may have hit a button if he whined that particular whine at me….

  18. Oh, yeah, I think that’s an awesome point Laurie. I would never ever tell my daughter that she is automatically protected by that. Just that by taking certain precautions, she can reduce her risk (trying to stay in larger groups, etc…) but never eliminate it. Let’s face it, she could get raped on a first date after taking every precaution in the world. Hopefully it will click at some point how to talk to her about this stuff.

Comments are currently closed.