In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

NYU Grad Student Strike

This has been brewing for a while, and it’s set to happen tomorrow. The situation, basically, is this: Under a 2000 National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision, graduate students, who teach classes in addition to taking their own, had the right to unionize. They had this right based on the theory that they are both students and employees (duh). Under the Bush Administration, the NLRB was packed with anti-workers’-rights conservatives, who reversed this decision and said that universities don’t have to recognize graduate student unions because graduate students aren’t employees. That’s what gets me most about this situation — the disrespect and head-in-the-sand perspective that would lead one to argue that grad students aren’t workers. They teach classes. They grade papers. They administer tests. They hold review sessions. They do as much work for their classes as any professor does, and they’re paid a pittance in comparison. They’re a blessing for this university, and as a former NYU undergrad who took a handful of recitation sessions with grad students, I’m personally offended that this school would so deeply under-value the contribution of TAs to our education.

My favorite graduate student, whose name I still remember from my freshman year of college (Ailsa Craig, if anyone is interested) was the first person to teach me about the complexities of feminism, and to frame it in a way that was engaging and appealing. I walked into her class not really caring about feminism at all — we filled out questionaires at the start of the semester asking whether or not we identified as feminists, and I definitively circled “no” — and walked out at the end of the semester seeing the world from an entirely different angle. The incredible professor for that class (Rabab Abdulhadi, now, I believe, at UMich) was certainly a defining factor in that development, but it was in Ailsa’s small-group discussions that everything really came together. I have no doubt that she’s long forgotten who I am by now, since I didn’t say much, and what I did say was probably pretty ignorant. But I haven’t forgotten her, and what she taught me was so incredibly formative in my identity that I’m outraged at the university’s refusal to allow her and her colleagues the basic organizing rights that should be afforded to all workers. Teachers matter, and graduate students who teach are employees deserving of recognition.

Of course, universities still have the option of recognizing graduate student unions — it’s just a matter of whether or not they continue to do so. NYU so far has been willing to go halfway, but not to fully recognize the grad union and allow them fair bargaining power. More from the grad union is here.

This story is getting coverage far and wide. Even the Freepers are on it.

At this point, NYU administration is not negotiating with graduate students at all, and the strike is inevitable. I’m not really affected by it because I don’t use main NYU buildings, and graduate students don’t teach any of my classes; I also won’t have to cross picket lines to get to class. But hopefully I’ll have some free time tomorrow, and will be able to join them in protesting. Lindsay Beyerstein will apparently be down in my neck of the woods today, and anyone else who can take a few hours to come and join the demonstration tomorrow and until the strike ends would certainly be appreciated. You can read one grad student’s opinion here.


23 thoughts on NYU Grad Student Strike

  1. As a former TA (at UCLA from 1991-1993), I have passionate feelings about grad student unions; I was a member of our fledgling union, and we almost went out on strike. The work was exhausting — teaching sections, grading papers, all while desperately trying to do our own work. In many ways, much tougher than what I do now.

  2. was the first person to teach me about the complexities of feminism, and to frame it in a way that was engaging and appealing.

    …’cause it needed to be dressed up a little, didn’t it? What was lacking before, Jill, that needed to be tweaked for you? Was she attractive and nice, rather than shrill, hateful, and spitting vinegar? This is the template for liberal doctrine — marketing to the hip younger set, give it a throwback 60s-type feel of community (naturally given the bulk of today’s professors hail from that triumphant era), peddle to the next generation

    what she taught me was so incredibly formative in my identity

    So she taught you how to think or what to think?

  3. Actually… no, it didn’t need to be dressed up, it needed to be stripped of all the anti-feminist ideas that have been tacked onto it over the years. I had internalized all the negative stereotypes of feminsim that you’re obviously operating under — of course, I had never really read anything by an actual feminist, or studied basic feminist philosophy (and for the record, she was a sociology grad student, not a gender studies one). Here’s what she did: She didn’t say, “feminsim is great” or “feminism is terrible.” She gave us a wide variety of feminist texts, and we actually read them. We figured out what “feminist” meant, and that there are lots of different feminisms — some we agreed with, and some we didn’t.

    She wasn’t conventionally “pretty,” and she was challenging and tough and straight-forward. I didn’t like her because I saw her as a potential girlfriend; I liked her because she was brilliant, and she taught me a new way of thinking. She didn’t teach me what to think or even how to think — like I said in the post, she just taught me a new way of thinking.

    And Rob, I’m gonna be honest, I am quickly tiring of the hostility in all of your comments. Cool it, please, it’s obnoxious.

  4. Great post, but I keep stalling on the name “Ailsa Craig”. She was named for a bird sanctuary? There’s also an Ailsa Craig onion, but that seems less likely.

  5. I am quickly tiring of the hostility in all of your comments

    Jill, are you asking me to ignore your hostile attitudes toward people like me? Do you expect your cheap shot posts to go unchallenged? I thought only the Right had Internet echo chambers. Or so I’m told by, well, you and your friends. I’ve taken my share on this site and I’m still here. Should I not be?

  6. There’ve been a couple of nearly-averted grad student strikes for better contracts around here. At my university, many undergraduate courses are taught by grad students, who are just as valuable as professors – in fact they’re more enthusiastic and interested in fostering discussion than the profs with upcoming retirement or giant egos.

    (Ailsa Craig’s a little town in my home county, too. Weird.)


  7. we filled out questionaires at the start of the semester asking whether or not we identified as feminists, and I definitively circled “no” — and walked out at the end of the semester seeing the world from an entirely different angle.

    Jill, don’t despair, there’s still HOPE!

  8. Jill, are you asking me to ignore your hostile attitudes toward people like me? Do you expect your cheap shot posts to go unchallenged? I thought only the Right had Internet echo chambers. Or so I’m told by, well, you and your friends. I’ve taken my share on this site and I’m still here. Should I not be?

    I’m sorry, but where in my entire post was I at all hostile to “people like you”? Are you a member of the NYU administration? (And I wasn’t even that hostile to them). How is a post about the NYU graduate student union protests a cheap shot at anyone? Please, do inform me. And I’m also curious as to where I said anything about only the Right having internet echo chambers. Feel free to explore the archives. I’m pretty sure you won’t ever find me making that claim.

    Look, you’re welcome to be here. I’m assuming you’ve noticed that we have lots of commenters who don’t agree with what we write, and I don’t remember banning any of them. Almost nothing I say goes unchallenged. I like that. But I also like the fact that I rarely have to request that they address me with a civil tone, because most people here already do that — they recognize that this space is operated by Lauren and I for the purpose of engaging in conversation and debate, and that it’s good manners to be polite to the people who are hosting and engaging you.

    We’re happy to have you here, Rob, but if you don’t like what you’re reading then no one is forcing you to stay. I’m not making you read what I write and then refusing to let you respond. You’re here by choice, and if what you read makes you angry, fine — challenge it, debate it, but start in with spewing vitriol and I’m gonna ask you to cool it.

  9. we filled out questionaires at the start of the semester asking whether or not we identified as feminists

    What the hell kind of class (or school, for that matter) gives you a political assessment at the beginning of the year? I would have written “None of your fucking business” across the top and handed it in unfilled.

  10. David, it was a women’s studies class. They often do that to see where their students are coming from in terms of feminist thought — run of the mill as far as I know.

    Try making women’s studies apolitical.

  11. The surveys were also anonymous, and we weren’t required to fill them out. Additionally, for every question there was an “opt out/don’t know” option.

  12. Try making women’s studies apolitical.

    You’ll have to enlist the aid of unicorns and the Easter Bunny to implement that fantasy.

    I’ve taken quite a few socialogy classes where anonymous surveys were given the first day.

    Fucking sociologists. The sole purpose of such surveys is to discover which sorts of bad thoughts the instructor should correct during the course.

  13. Fucking sociologists. The sole purpose of such surveys is to discover which sorts of bad thoughts the instructor should correct during the course.

    It seems whenever I use the “F word in a post, it requires moderation so this might take a while to appear….

    My teachers actually seemed pretty middle of the road. When they weren’t, I knew enough to disregard the liberal indoctrination.

  14. For once, Jill, you and I are in total agreement. Teaching assistants do all the grunt work and barely make enough to make ends meet. Teaching a couple sections while enrolled in 6-9 hours of graduate level courses is no joke. From what I understand, T.A.’s aren’t offered benefits like medical & dental insurance because, as you mentioned, they’re not considered “real” employees.

    I hope the NYU teaching assistants strike and I hope their union is the first of several that spring up around the country. When you consider what these people do and what they get in return, It becomes clearly evident that they’re well overdue for organized resistance.

  15. When I was a grad student, I went out on strike twice. The union won recognition while I was at UC, after 15 years of the U claiming that we were ‘apprentice scholars’, not employees, and we got our first contract- and had to strike for it- while I was there. That was back before Bush stacked the NLRB with anti-worker ideologues.The U KNOWS what our contributions are; that’s why mine caved so fast when we went out on strike. It’s an academic sweatshop, straight up exploitation. They know very well that we are employees but they say we aren’t because it’s their union busting strategy.

    Thank you for so nicely acknowledging the contributions grad students make.

  16. Some clarifications are in order here:

    First, graduate student employee unions (or, in our parlance, ASE – academic student employee – unions) have been around for a number of years. The first one was organized at the University of Wisconsin in 1969. Two other campuses followed in the 1970s (Michigan in 1975 and Oregon in 1977), but the most significant growth happened in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The key distinctions to be made here are that the NLRB ruling 1) concerns the right of ASEs at private universities to organize into unions and 2) the most recent ruling is a reversal of an NLRB ruling in 2000 that stated that ASEs at private universities could form unions. In the case of NYU, the result is that the administration will not negotiate a new contract with ASEs to succeed the one that was negotiated in 2002. There are roughly 23 ASE unions in the United States, and they’re almost all public universities, because organizing at those institutions is covered under state labor laws.

  17. Poor TAs…forced (at gunpoint, one assumes) to get underpaid and overworked in an effort to better their lives.

    After all, corporate American gets away with it. Why not the universities? Hell, it’s 2005. Taking advantage of the poor is the way to go. Not only can we have wage slaves, we can knowledge slaves as well. Unless, of course, you only want the wealthy to obtain advanced degrees. Yet another can of worms there.

    So, when can I buy some stock in Yale or Duke? I heard they’re doing quite well. Where did I put that that quarterly profit report?

  18. And I’m also curious as to where I said anything about only the Right having internet echo chambers.

    What is the purpose of your semiweekly forays into Townhall? You’re right about my tone, though, and I’m sorry. There’s no point in shouting against the wind here, so I’ll quit.

  19. Thanks Jill. What a wonderfully generous post. Nice to know I’m remembered–and you are too.

    As for my name, yes, it is a town in Ontario, a type of onion, a race horse that died, a type of tomato, several hotels and b&b places, an island off the coast of Scotland and a boat that sank.

    I was named after all of them, by parents with a slightly twisted sense of humour.

Comments are currently closed.