In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

U.S. Pastors Silent in the Face of Genocide in Uganda

Uganda is set to pass a bill that would recommend the death penalty for gay people who are “repeat” offenders — that is, gay people who have sex more than once (your punishment for one-time sex is life in prison, unless you’re HIV-positive, in which case you also get the death penalty). It also mandates prison terms for anyone who fails to report homosexual activity.

Brave members of the Ugandan Anglican church are speaking out, likening the bill to genocide against gay Ugandans. While Byamugisha took a big risk in countering the tides of hate in his country, American pastors who have long meddled in Ugandan politics and policy — and who face no similar risks in speaking out — are staying silent. American Evangelicals like Rick Warren have exported homophobia, and encouraged African pastors to marginalize gay people. Anti-gay organizations in Africa were well funded under the Bush administration, which threw money at religious groups as part of its HIV/AIDS strategy (the result? An uptick in HIV/AIDS in Uganda, a country where rates had previously steadily fallen).

American conservatives have convinced their African peers that collaborating with them somehow represents a kind of anti-colonial resistance. One is almost tempted to applaud the American right’s audacity. After all, it generally opposed Africa’s national liberation movements, and often smeared the progressive churches that supported them. Now, by presenting homosexuality as the corrupt imposition of a decadent, dying West, American Christian conservatives have positioned themselves as champions of the developing world’s cultural authenticity. Meanwhile, African leaders purport to fight Americanization by aligning with some of the most powerful and chauvinistic of American religious leaders, and even taking US government money.

Like anti-Semitism, homophobia can’t necessarily be controlled by those who unleash it. Scott Lively, for example, might balk at instituting the death penalty for homosexuality, but Uganda is only taking his work to its logical conclusion. Lively, after all, has claimed, in his book The Poisoned Stream, that “a dark and powerful homosexual presence” can be traced through “the Spanish Inquisition, the French ‘Reign of Terror,’ the era of South African apartheid, and the two centuries of American slavery.” Surely, strong measures are necessary to combat something so sinister!

Rick Warren, who has close ties and heavy influence in Uganda, is passing the buck, claiming that just focuses on his relief work and doesn’t take sides in politics:

Our role, and the role of the PEACE Plan, whether in Uganda or any other country, is always pastoral and never political. We vigorously oppose anything that hinders the goals of the PEACE Plan: Promoting reconciliation, Equipping ethical leaders, Assisting the poor, Caring for the sick, and Educating the next generation.”

But Warren won’t go so far as to condemn the legislation itself. A request for a broader reaction to the proposed Ugandan antihomosexual laws generated this response: “The fundamental dignity of every person, our right to be free, and the freedom to make moral choices are gifts endowed by God, our creator. However, it is not my personal calling as a pastor in America to comment or interfere in the political process of other nations.” On Meet the Press this morning, he reiterated this neutral stance in a different context: “As a pastor, my job is to encourage, to support. I never take sides.”

So he vigorously opposes anything that hinders his PEACE plan… but executing gay people doesn’t qualify? And “I never take sides” my ass. Warren takes sides all the time. He runs around calling abortion a “genocide,” but he can’t bring himself to even condemn a law that forces people to rat out their gay neighbors and mandates the execution of gay people. He should at least be honest: This law is the logical outcome of the hate-filled rhetoric that he and his compatriots have spewed in Africa, so he is simply indifferent.

It’s shameful. And yes, it enables murder and genocide.


18 thoughts on U.S. Pastors Silent in the Face of Genocide in Uganda

  1. Making a stand on what is essentially genocide is NOT a political thing. It’s moral. Rick Warren should be ashamed of himself. The way his words are weaseling around on this one is just gross

  2. Why would you expect Warren, or any other right-wing ‘religious’ figure to speak out against this? The American religious right is cut from the same cloth. They want a return to a medieval society just as badly as the Ugandans who pushed this shit, the Taliban, or any other asshole regressive cult. And, given other recent news, it appears that the entire country of Switzerland is on the way to join them.

  3. If the American Christian Right really, truly loved “the sinners” (as in, hate the sin, love the sinner), then they would be damning this state-sponsored genocide as the obscenity it is.

  4. The whole law contradicts itself. Prison for first time gay offenders, death for HIV positive offenders… but, oh wait, it’s a prison term if you don’t tell them that you’re gay. Why would anyone want to tell them that after they’re faced with those options? Prison or death. I am reminded of the movie V For Vendetta when reading this article. Remember when all of the homosexuals were black bagged and done away with?

    As for where religion stands, I think the world would be a better place without it, in a way, because then we would have a chance to be more opened minded. No one should condemn anyone on the basis of being different but because religion is there, it happens.

    At the same time, if we didn’t have religion no one would have morals to live by and it would cause mass hysteria. Though I am not very religious, the religious background that I was raised with has given me a foundation for the moral system I live by today.

    There has to be a way to control the spread of HIV/AIDS without violating a persons human rights. Uganda, I can see, has good intentions but they aren’t executing their plans ethically and that is where the intention is dramatically skewed.

  5. Rick Warren is just another person adhering to “sound the trumpet, blow the horn, we will love you ’till you’re born” manifesto. He should examine that conscience of his for opposing abortion but taking no sides on the death penalty. I guess genocide is only unfair sometimes. Which is something I’ll never understand about the religious right. If they held firm on their opinions of what constitutes murder, they’d be more credible.

  6. Rick Warren supports this law. We have to keep saying it. If we say it loudly and he doesn’t deny it, it becomes part of the public record. He wants this law passed, he is in favor of genocide of Uganda’s gay people. Rick Warren supports this law. Rick Warren is in favor of genocide. Otherwise, he would simply say, “I am against this.” His contemptible dodge is an effort to get the law passed without making clear to his American supporters how hateful he is. Rick Warren supports this law. Rick Warren supports genocide.

  7. It’s not just homosexuals, who are at risk: anyone who tries to help them, or who doesn’t report them to the police, I also liable to receive a sentence of 7 years, for the “crime” of “promoting homosexuality.”

    It is utterly insane, and the Ugandan government has said that it has no qualms about withdrawing from various international treaties or not receiving aid from other countries, as long at it can pass this hateful measure. They wouldn’t be nearly as insouciant if they hadn’t recently struck oil.

    Africa isn’t generally the most LGBTQ-friendliest continent, but there are quite a few Kenyans who are terrified at what our neighbours are doing next door. Religious groups are powerful, we’re in the middle of rewriting our constitution, and some of us are desperately fighting to get protections for LGBTQ people written in. Uganda’s example really isn’t helping.

  8. Gah!

    That should have read “…is also liable to receive a sentence of seven years”

    Silly passionate typing.

  9. At the same time, if we didn’t have religion no one would have morals to live by and it would cause mass hysteria.

    um, this atheist is a very moral person thankyouverymuch.

    /derail

  10. At least they are more progressive than US allies like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. They give first timers a chance.

  11. There has to be a way to control the spread of HIV/AIDS without violating a persons human rights.

    Uganda had that when its medical and aid infrastructures could engage in sex education and dispersal of condoms. Now, with the global gag order on talk of abortion and foreign pastors pushing abstinence only, HIV rates are exploding.

  12. This makes me so angry >:(

    So typical of right-wingers to encourage dangerous behavior and then once someone else adopts it, not claim any responsibility for it. And you can bet these people are all for capital punishment but at the same time are against “murderous abortion”!

  13. @Thomas – looks like our pressure has moved Rick Warren to issue a condemnation of the law: http://www.rickwarren.com/

    Personally, I find Warren incredibly offensive. But I have to believe that if so many people hadn’t called him out on his words and (in)actions, he would never have spoken against the law. And because he is so well respected in some circles, I hope that his condemnation will contribute to this law not getting passed.

  14. At the same time, if we didn’t have religion no one would have morals to live by and it would cause mass hysteria.

    This is highly offensive. Religious people do not have a monopoly on morality.

  15. Also, this has nothing to do with “good intentions” on the part of Ugandan law makers who support this law, and everything to do with using HIV/AIDS as an excuse to criminalize LGBTQ people.

Comments are currently closed.