In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

287(g): Can White Privilege Ever Be Exercised for Good?

(In this post, I’m going to be talking about how the 287(g) program plays out here in Nashville, Tennessee, because that’s what I’m most familiar with. This stuff may be applicable in other communities–I suspect it is–but I’m not going to presume to know.)

Like many Southern cities, Nashville’s predominate racial make-up was white and black.  Over the past fifteen years, the Hispanic population has grown immensely (an 800% increase) and there are now roughly 50,000 Hispanics in Nashville, which is about 10% of the population.

The 287(g) program, if you have not heard of it, gives some powers of immigration enforcement to the Sheriff’s office.  So, if you are arrested in Nashville and they have reason to suspect that you might be an illegal immigrant, you are run through a Federal database and held for ICE and then deported.

When this program was presented to cities, it was sold as a way to make it easier to hold and deport dangerous criminals.  It has become, as you might imagine, a way to terrorize ten percent of our neighbors.  Our Sheriff even brags about having removed 5,000 illegal immigrants from our community in the two years we’ve had the 287(g) program, as if it’s perfectly fine and cause for pride that one man has the power to disappear one percent of a city’s population (or ten percent of any particular ethnicity).

But let’s step back a second. Because I think the old-school racism of 287(g) is so blatant that most people look past it.

I mean, if I told you that Nashville had a program to lower the number of brown people in our city, if I phrased it that way, you’d either think that I was making stuff up or that I lived in a place that had yet to hear of the 1960s.

But ICE doesn’t force cities to participate. Cities who have a need for it ask to participate and then have to get approval.  Well, what exactly is this “need”?  You can’t tell if a person is here illegally by looking at him. So, how, exactly, did Nashville decided that the number of illegal immigrants here was a problem that needed a solution in which we called in the Feds?

I hope you don’t feel like I’m insulting your intelligence by spelling this out, but we only needed 287(g) after the demographics of our city had changed so radically.  In other words, the presence of all these brown people, speaking Spanish, was/is a “problem.”

That’s racist, obviously.  But it goes further than that.  This is a “problem” the community will know is solved if the community perceives there to be fewer brown people.  Remember, you can’t tell if someone is here illegally by looking at him.  So, how are you going to judge, as resident of our city, if 287(g) works?  It has to seem that there are fewer brown people here.

It could not get any more old school racist than that–we perceive that the problem is that there are too many brown people, we come up with a program that allows us to justify to ourselves and to the rest of the country why we need to reduce the number of brown people in our community (in this case that many of them are here illegally and we just love America so much that we have to protect it from those illegal immigrants who want to come here and ruin things by getting jobs and giving their kids a good education), and then we start rounding up brown people and shipping them elsewhere.

Not all of us can admit this out-loud, even to ourselves, of course, because we want to believe that we are good people and not terrible racists who increase suffering in order to preserve our own comfort.  See our beloved Sheriff Hall, whose baby our 287(g) program is. He spoke to the local chapter of the CCC, and his claim was that it never occurred to him that they might be racist (apparently we’re supposed to believe that no one in his office can use Google, or something).

It never occurred to him that the groups of white people who might be most enthusiastic about his program were racists?! It still boggles my mind and that happened last year.

But here’s my question, folks, which goes back to the title of the post. Can white privilege ever be exercised for good?  Here we have a racist program, which is causing terrible havoc in our Hispanic community. People don’t want to call the police when crimes are committed because, if, say, they see their neighbor’s house getting broken into, they don’t want the cops to come and cart of their neighbor. Homes are disrupted, families torn apart. You can’t hear from the people in the community without feeling like, “Holy cow, this is terrible.”

Now, there are a lot of really good local organizations like TIRCC and, of course, the ACLU, and on and on who are working to mitigate the suffering caused by 287(g).

But the truth is that it’s a racist program.

Doesn’t that oblige the folks with the least to lose–white native-born citizens–to speak up the loudest?

You see what I’m saying?  In a situation like this, the concerns of white, native-born citizens are privileged (shoot, do you think we’d even have this program if a bunch of white folks hadn’t been all “Oh my god, when I drive down Nolensville Road now, all the signs are in Spanish! Something must be done!”) and the voices of the people most affected by this are marginalized and criminalized.

I can speak out against 287(g) without fear because of my extreme privileged in this situation. And I think it’s because of my extreme privilege in this situation that what I say is heard, even if I get dismissed as being a liberal or a Yankee or whatever.

I feel a moral imperative to speak out, because my privilege gives me a way of being heard when my neighbor is not or cannot speak out.

But it reinforces this idea that the brown people in Nashville are not really participants, but just a “problem” for the white people to work out.

I don’t know.  It’s pernicious, how racism works, how it forces you to be complicit in it, even in order to work against it.

(Look at the shape of this post, even, how there’s only so long I can look outward before I have to turn the subject back to me.

I’m embarrassed upon re-reading it that it’s so obvious, but I’m going to let it stand anyway, because that’s a side effect of white privilege and living in a racist society: it fucks you up. No use in getting defensive and pretending that it doesn’t. Or rewriting in order to mask it.)


72 thoughts on 287(g): Can White Privilege Ever Be Exercised for Good?

  1. As I legal immigrant who went through the long and tedious process of meeting all the requirements to enter US i take offense at your article. I think it is racist to allow one particular group of people be exempt from all the laws that apply to millions of other people (in Africa, Asia, Europe) who just happened to be conveniently located to enter US by jumping the border in the middle of the night. It should be equal for all who want to enter US. Your propose preferential treatment of one group and that IS racist. (don’t tell me you don’t propose it – if amnesty was instituted – we know which group of illegal immigrants would benefit the most – and it is NOT asians or irish. )

  2. what bothers me about your observations is how insular they are. You are confusing xenophobia with white privilege as it just so happens that the inhabitants of America’s poor neighbouring countries are brown.

    Contrast it with immigration in the UK where many illegal immigrants are white Eastern Europeans, and are considered scum, just like Hispanics are in the US.

    Like many, I’m anti-immigration , both legal and illegal,as the immigrants gains come at *my* loss.

    Not all loses are economic, I have to contend with and make concessions for other people’s ideas, languages, cultures, religions, etc. on MY dirt. I don’t want anything from those people, and yet my tax dollars and fruits of my labour go to benefit them…so they can replicate and force me to make even more concessions. F-them.

  3. Yeah, Alex, there is a serious problem in North America with immigrant populations coming in and breeding and forcing their languages and cultures on people who just want to live their lives productively and peaceful and have nothing to do with these greedy newcomers. Everyone knows foreign men have irrepressible sexual appetites, but noo, we’re not allowed to protect the REAL American women from them because we have to understand and respect their needs, and there’s even laws preventing real Americans from enacting proper sentences against those rapists.

    And they don’t even TRY to learn the language, they just passed on their foreign gabble to their kids. I mean, honestly, would it kill them to learn Cherokee or Navajo? They don’t even have to be fluent, just enough that real Americans don’t have to make sure their kids can speak English just so they can live with these nasty immigrants and their children?

  4. Irene, the situation is different, though. There is no way for people with no “skills” to get here legally from Mexico and yet more and more of our economy has grown dependent on using the giant pool of low-wage labor available from Mexico. It’s a fundamental dishonesty of our immigration system that we provide no legal way for a large labor pool we need to get here.

    And that needs to be rectified.

    There are no requirements these folks can meet, and yet we require them.

    That’s not the fault of Mexican immigrants. That’s the fault of the American government. Blaming immigrants for that completely misses the point.

    Speaking of missing the point, there’s Alex.

    One would hope it would have taken more than two comments to get to “But I have a right to hate scum!” But there you go.

  5. you are asking if whites should speak up against racism. its like asking if men should stand up to misogyny. as i see it, both are a resounding “yes.” its kind of like a “if you arent part of the solution you are part of the problem” scenario in both isnt it? when male feminists support feminism, and point out and criticise other men (or society generally) for being sexist, it comes across (to me at least) as being very supportive. so long as the man is educated on the issues, and knows how to speak about it without abusing women with his male privilege. for example, dominating the dicussion, and telling women and feminists that he is a better feminist than they are because of thus and so, and acting like he knows everything about everything. JMO.

  6. How come you did not state why 287(g) became law here in the first place ? When Mexican Gustavo Reyes Garcia, who had four previous arrests for drunk driving and he was arrested more than a dozen times without ever coming to the attention of the police. Is why this program was invokeed.Nashville was not just sitting around one day and decided to make 287 ( g ) it was only after a number of deaths caused by people in the country illegally brought this about . If anybody brought about 287 ( g ) it’s the very people who either were repeat offenders or have caused a death is why 287 ( g ) became law. Not because the Gov had to much time on their hands.

  7. A white person couldn’t do much before he/she is labeled a race traiter and has much of the privilege torn up.

  8. Wow.
    Just….wow.
    I don’t mean to get all meta here in the comment section, but my response is actually directed at the first two comments, not at the post.
    And just for Alex – can you be a little more specific (it’d be almost impossible to be less so) about what sort of zero-sum gains and losses immigration racks up? Because your 3rd paragraph reads like a paranoid assertion without details.

  9. you are asking if whites should speak up against racism. its like asking if men should stand up to misogyny.

    In one sense, yes. Every (nearly every?) time a white person acts, there is an element of inherent privilege, so a white person is inevitably exercising privilege when s/he speaks out against discrimination and is heard. But I think Aunt B is trying to get at a slightly different, less simplistic question. There is a difference between passively asserting privilege, which is what I just described and not necessarily possible to avoid, and actively asserting one’s privilege, which I would describe as BUT WHAT ABOUT TEH MENZ.

    There have been several discussions here recently that have involved a situation of “putting a white face on a problem”–times where [white] authorities and the [white] public have ignored a situation that has been hurting people of color, and only when WHITE people start getting hurt has the problem been addressed. Actively asserting white privilege when speaking out against 287(g) would be saying something like, “This is how it hurts white people, and we should get rid of it because it hurts white people.” I *think* Aunt B’s question is, is that a legitimate strategy to deploy in fighting 287(g). Because, like it or not, it does tend to be effective.
    So to answer that question, I don’t think this strategy of active white privilege (WHAT ABOUT TEH WHITEYZ) should play a role in the public fight against 287(g). Because then, as soon as the situation improves just enough for white people to stop seeing that there is a problem for them, the people in power, i.e. whites, will stop trying to improve the situation. On a person-to-person basis, however, I think that showing someone how something affects him or her as an *individual*, rather than as a White Person (even if that’s the actual meaning), can be useful.

  10. “Doesn’t that oblige the folks with the least to lose–white native-born citizens–to speak up the loudest?”

    I’m….unclear, I guess, as to how white privilege comes into this at all. If the program is racist, and you’re someone who sees this and sees few speaking up about it, then why agonize? Speak up!

    Determining who can/should speak up on a particular issue seems to be rather fruitless, given that they generally won’t. If you were trying to steal the thunder of Latin@ activists making the same point, that’d be a whole different scenario.

    Where’s the conflict here?

  11. Well, clearly, I do speak up about it. But I’m trying to get at what Willow is getting at.

    If the system is racist, then primacy is given to white people’s concerns. I, for instance, think it’s wrong that it’s easier for white people to be heard and to get our needs addressed than it is for other folks. And I think that, normally, I should do what I can to undermine that dynamic, if I’m interested in social justice.

    But, in a case like this, where the situation is so dire and the racism so pervasive, I feel like white people do need to step up and be heard, because we have the best chance of being heard, precisely because we’re white.

    But, it makes me feel uneasy because it does reinforce the fact that white people run the country and we sit around making decisions about non-white people’s lives.

    From where I’m sitting, it seems okay–people are suffering and we need to do what we can to end suffering now, even if it means working within the system.

    But I’m sitting in a very privileged position and I also think it’s my obligation to say “I think I’m helping, but am I actually doing harm?”

    Jill, Reyes Garcia SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN JAIL. Regardless of where he was from. He shouldn’t have been out on the streets to kill anyone. Let’s not overlook that.

    And I tell you what–why don’t you go to the Sheriff’s department’s website, peruse his report on 287(g) (http://www.nashville-sheriff.net/) and consider what, besides being brown, every single person who is named in that report has in common.

    And then, when it dawns on you, come on back and we can have an interesting conversation about how male privilege reinforces itself by pretending that problems that are endemic to MEN, are caused by “people” who happen to conveniently also share some other trait that is easily villifiable.

  12. How did I know this was immediately going to be filled with commenters insisting “But it’s NOT racist!” and taking you to task for it. While also making comments like “preferential treatment based on race” (that is, NOT using a racist justice system to punish people of a certain race is somehow preferential treatment for them) and “my tax dollars”/”MY dirt”/etc. (no comment necessary) and so forth?

    People, seriously, would it kill you to stop, take a step back and look at how the system works? And how it is using you to perpetuate its injustices? By trying to shout down another white person who speaks up against it. This is how the system preserves itself, and you are happily letting it use you that way.

  13. @Irene: in fact, the US has a (pretty much yearly) green-card lottery that is open to people here from pretty much every country in Europe (except the UK and Poland), pretty much every country in Asia (except Korea, mainland China, and the Indian subcontinent), and pretty much every country in Africa, but is pretty much closed to those from the Americas. Not that I would want to confuse you with the facts or anything.

    I agree that the legal immigration system as it now exists is labyrinthine and slow (it has been since the Reagan administration), but that’s all the more reason to reform the system, not a reason to keep existing barriers in place.

    As for B’s question, let’s note that not all US citizens are white and not all undocumented immigrants are people of color. Citizens speaking up to help immigrants may not intersect with white privilege at all. But white folks need to look out for the way they do things; the exercise of privilege may show up in the manner something is done even if it isn’t an intrinsic part of that thing.

  14. I find it amazing how you consider it “YOUR dirt” when it was stolen from the original inhabitants by white Europeans. Why shouldn’t you make concessions, they are doing the same for you. Don’t forget that all White people in America are immigrants.

    And regarding your comment about the UK and Immigration, you’ll find that it’s only right wing newspapers, their readers and political groups such as UKIP and the BNP who consider them scum. Most Eastern European immigrants actually pay taxes and work hard doing the jobs British borns consider beneath them. Most are also Legal due to EU legislation which is really what is being protested against by the newspapers. I am British and pro Multi-Culturalism and believe that the ideas, languages, cultures and religions, etc. can only enrich society. If you’re against other peoples’ ideas and culture then do you not eat pizza, pasta, curry, burritos, enchiladas, tacos etc? All these are a result of immigration.

  15. Hmm. Here is the thing. In theory, 287(g) only applies to people who are already arrested. According to the report you link “To date, over 5,300 illegal aliens, who were first arrested for a crime, have been processed for removal from the United States.” I’m pretty widely known to be a bleeding heart liberal, but I have to say that facially I have no problem with this. As long as they aren’t rounding people up to look for papers, I don’t see the problem with the program. It’s another step into the background check of someone already in trouble with the law for an unrelated reason. If anyone has evidence that such round-up type behavior is happening, I would love to see it (I’m serious. I work in law enforcement – not a cop, but I work in the law enforcement field and if this is happening I want to know about it to see if something can be done).

    While it’s true that we’re a large county in a Southern red state (redundant I know), it’s also worth noting that we’re in a blue county that, by geographical standards, is fairly progressive. It seems irresponsible to discuss this topic in terms of race relations and xenophobia without also mentioning the fact that we also recently voted down the charter amendment that would have made us an English-only metro. (see http://www.nashvilleforallofus.org/).

    Are we still backwards, racist, and xenophobic? Sure we are. But that’s not all there is to the story. We’re also one of the major immigration centers in the Southeast with a remarkably diverse population from all over the globe. I think that gets lost in the discussion sometimes. We still have miles and miles to go, but we’re farther along than we often get credit for.

  16. Roxie–

    I agree with the comment that the “dirt” was stolen, but the idea that “they [Native Americans] are doing the same for you” (making concessions?).

    I don’t think that’s really how it went down. We stole it, many Native American groups fought like hell to get it back, and we killed/raped/tortured them in a massive series of genocides until they were forced to make those “concessions” to our living on their land. It wasn’t a “gee, we feel like sharing, let’s live on these third world pink squares in the middle of the richest country in the world.”

    RE: the bill.
    I can see how the application of the bill can be racist and unequally directed towards brown people. I’m not seeing how the bill itself is problematic, unless you are arguing that prosecuting illegal immigration itself is racist?

  17. Inasmuch as I think we should dispense with borders entirely and let people work where they will, I’m not much popular in any of these debates 🙂

  18. FreshPeaches> I think the problem is that if a brown person is seen jaywalking, the police may be more likely to ENFORCE a law thinking they may get to deport someone. A law they would not even think about if it were a white person. Or not using a blinker for a right turn, or spitting on the sidewalk… You may live in a blue county, but the police in general, in any area, are not well know for their liberal politics, and they are the ones who enforce the laws and make the arrests. The population at large may feel they aren’t racist, but by giving the police these powers, they are giving them the power to enforce racism. It’s like the dishonest argument that democrats make that they only voted to give GWB the POWER to invade Iraq… they didn’t actually vote to invade it!

  19. I’m sitting in a very privileged position, I would really like ask how is it you are sitting there in a very privileged position, this comes out sounding like this is a very exclusive club and as it is anybody can speak out either for or against 287 ( g ) there is no special requirement to voice an opinion on 287 ( G) anybody legal or illegal can voice an opinion on 287 ( G) without feeling they are sitting in a very privileged position.To resolve any claims of racism why not truly Advocate that everybody arrested and booked into the jail all have their status of citizenship checked.If you stop and think about it ,all of these folks left countries where Corruption is a serious problem and tolerance of corruption here erodes the rule of law. I mean by this it is virtually impossible to live and work in the United States without documents and anyone here illegally will turn to fraudulent document dealers for falsified Social Security cards, forged drivers licenses, counterfeit green cards, and a wide range of other phony documents.

  20. Maybe because we only became so concerned with citizenship status in the smallest of cases when it came to be that a large number of noncitizens had a certain color skin.

    This is how racism *works.* People rarely attack race directly. They instead attack it through channels. And tell themselves that because it’s not directly race, it’s not racist/not racially unjust.

    Citizenship is a proxy for concerns about certain kinds of people.

  21. FreshPeaches, you might contact the people at TIRCC, if you are interested in working to ensure that people aren’t rounded up and checked for papers. That is happening.

    Think on this (http://diverseeducation.com/artman/publish/article_12997.shtml). Hispanic drivers are pulled over in Nashville and ultimately arrested at higher rates than in cities of similar size. You honestly believe that, when a police officer is deciding whether to issue a ticket or make an arrest, he is not aware that making an arrest will lead to someone being put through immigration screening and that such knowledge doesn’t have any impact on whether someone is arrested?

    I mean, to come at it from another angle, do we think the African American community is lying when they complain about racial targeting while driving in town? Or do we assume that the problem is only limited to the black community?

  22. Chava –

    I meant the immigrants who Alex was so firmly against are making concessions. But did not some Native Americans learn English so as to be able to trade with the setters?

  23. FreshPeaches, the way it works in Nashville is that the police stop you for looking “wrong” to them (wrong color of skin, wrong model of car, wrong neighborhood according to your license plate), in order to run an outstanding warrant check on you. If for some reason (like accent or skin color) they decide you may be an immigrant, they will say that you were uncooperative when they stopped you and arrest you for that, so that they can check your immigration status. Then they come around to neighborhood association meetings and tell the people there that they’re doing it, and expect to be thanked for it.

  24. Sorry for the misunderstanding! I’m not sure what the fact that some individuals learned English has to do with the current situation, though? Some European immigrants learned various native dialects for trade as well.
    Language assimilation and extinction certainly happened, but it came later, and was mostly a result of genocide and slavery, as far as I know.

    Anyway, it doesn’t parallel with the current situation as an example very well, imho, since there are so few similarities other than the geographical.

  25. If legal immigrants are being harrassed or detained merely because of the color of their skin or the language they speak, that is unacceptable.

    But if your neighbor is illegal and gets deported–whether after being arrested for drunk driving or for being unlucky enough to have her house broken into–then I have no problem with that.

    While racists may support laws against illegal immigrants, it does not make the laws themselves racist.

  26. Joe, what happens then when your neighbor sees your house being broken into or you being mugged in the street, but doesn’t want to call the cops because she doesn’t want to be deported? I guess that’s just your tough luck?

  27. No, it’s your neighbor’s fault for daring to look like an “illegal” (read: be brown). If she didn’t do that, this law wouldn’t be racist!

  28. What is the definition of racism and what race is Hispanic? People who suggest people who oppose illegal immigration are racist is out of vogue. The new term is “Ethnic Haters.” You see Hispanics are of many, if not all races. When Sotomayor was first nominated some in the media described her as an immigrant. Even Latina went away since Hispanics are not Latinos. Italians are Latinos, get it? Italy, Rome, Latin. It’s linear logic. It is all about amnesty and having the government overwhelmed with 12-20,000,000 green card applicants so they have to contract La Raza, LULAC and the like and they will make billions and the flow will never end.

  29. “A white person couldn’t do much before he/she is labeled a race traiter and has much of the privilege torn up.”

    I don’t think that’s true. Standing up against racism doesn’t make a white person’s name “look better” on a resume, or make hir look less white when sie walks down the street. And if it did, so what? White privilege isn’t something we’re supposed to have in the first place.

  30. @Joe in Oakland: If legal immigrants are being harrassed or detained merely because of the color of their skin or the language they speak, that is unacceptable.

    But the only way the Nashville police have found to carry out the 287(g) program is by selectively enforcing nuisance laws against anyone who “might be” an illegal immigrant, i.e. anyone who looks Hispanic. Legal immigrants and citizens both who are of the “wrong” color have to deal with a lot of extra harassment because of it.

  31. White immigrants are not treated the same, even when the are illegal immigrants. I knew a Polish family who were illegal immigrants for a good decade who were never harassed. Yet my sister in law who paid upwards of $2000 for green card paperwork has been harassed on more than one occasion. And this harassment does not just play out for latino immigrants, it is also done against US born Latino citizens (who, fyi make up 1/3 of all US latinos). There is definitely a race fear issue going on here.

    As to the whole economic bull, I am from a rural area with a growing population of Latino immigrants. They have been great for our economy. Stores that have been boarded up since I was a smile child are up and running again, there are actually people shopping downtown, run down houses are being fixed up and new houses are being built even in this recession. Try to live in the reality of poor America instead of using it as an excuse for your middle class whining.

    And, so what if people speak Spanish. Oh no we’re moving towards a multilingual culture, it’s the apocolypse! This is just a weird fear of going somewhere and not being able to communicate, a fear that you inflicit upon millions of US citizens with your stupid all English laws. Don’t pull the paternalistic crap about how they will not be able to get along in society. You a-hole antiimmigrant people are the ones who pass the laws to deny them equal access.

    Oh, and to you immigrant haters, unless you are Native American, why don’t you take your immigrant desended ass back to Europe. Why should an accident of birth mean that one person is more valuable than another? If you are born on this side of an imaginary line, we will give you all these rights, if you are born on the other, fuck you. Have you all forgotten you are talking about people?

  32. Your white privilege is evidenced by the fact that you are making the issue about you and what you should do, but at least you cop to that.

    And the blatant racism and xenophobia in the comments is disgusting.

    Justifying this law with the fact that one or two immigrants killed people is outrageous. “One brown person did something bad, we’d better start deporting all of them just in case!”

    Claiming that it’s alright to forcibly rip people away from their families because “they shouldn’t have been here in the first place!” ignores our economy’s need for them and outs you as a terrible human being in general. Go back to your own country with your intolerance – or did you forget your ancestors raped and pillaged the natives and that you’re actually not an American?

  33. I disagree with you and with Kaylen that your coming back to your own actions reveals white privilege. You’re the narrator. It’s natural for you to talk about the issue and also discuss your own actions and reactions. The stream of consciousness self-reproach detracts from your otherwise cogent argument.

  34. “I find it amazing how you consider it “YOUR dirt” when it was stolen from the original inhabitants by white Europeans. ”
    Why is loaded language like “stealing land” only used when the perpetrators are white and the victims brown?

  35. I have a random, and (I hope) interesting thought. I think a lot of the blanket pro-immigration, multicultural sentiment among educated middle-class people is a manifestation of class privilege.

    Hear me out.

    Who is more likely to be billingual and good with language, in general–the educated, middle class or the working poor? Who is going to have time and money to eat interesting, varied ethnic food vs. Burger King and McDonalds? Who is in competition with immigrants for jobs–lawyers and psychiatrists or construction workers and landscapers?

    I think working class White Americans have legitimate concerns about immigration that are not merely fueled by bigotry (although no one can deny there’s a lot of racism). The native-born working class bares the negative consequences of the immigration, whereas the higher levels of the socioeconomic spectrum reap the benefits. Not surprisingly, if you control for others factors, views on immigration are highly correlated with education and income level (especially education).

    Does this mean that immigrants should be excluded and harrassed by society and government? No. In fact, I’d like to see increased (progressive) political conciousness across the entire working class and more labor organizing between citizens and undocumented workers. The fact is that business interests are ruthlessly exploiting Mexicans in their own country which drives them to enter the United States for a better life. Once they are here, they are used by business interests again in THIS country to drive down wages for everyone.

    The solution is a strong labor movements that transcends race, ethnicity, geography and everything else. But I think it’s inaccurate to say that all anti-immigration sentiment is motivated by mere bigotry as opposed to genuine hardship.

  36. In reference to some of the comments above – I don’t think it’s possible to disentangle xenophobia from racism and classism. Racism and classism feed xenophobia – white immigrants from wealthy countries don’t face the same kind of xenophobia that brown immigrants from poor countries face. Xenophobia and classism can feed racism too – somebody upthread mentioned Eastern European immigrants to Western Europe and while it’s true that they face xenophobia despite being white, it’s also true that Eastern Europeans are considered by some to be a seperate (inferiour) race (Slavs). That’s no doubt because of classism and xenophobia. They all feed each other. You can’t fight one without fighting all of them.

  37. the comments here (and the original article) reminded me of all the big anti-poverty nonprofits that serve largely poor, minority clients. the providers, staff, and directors are almost always white. most of them are also wealthy. if they were always questioning whether or not they were rudely exercising rich, white privilege in standing up for thier clients, they wouldnt get anything done. they certainly wouldnt be filing legal briefs on behalf of the general public (friend of the court or amicus briefs, in the absence of a client at all.) would they? not saying that they shouldnt question their privilege. i worked in one of these, and more than once i saw a colleague horribly embarrass themselves by demonstrating blatant privilege (they werent embarrassed though, since they didnt even notice they were doing it, but they shouldve been ashamed). its just a thought, if someone is contemplating standing up against something, or doing nothing. theres a lot of good thats done by these nonprofits. (a lot of it is the rich, white folks making themselves feel better, of course).

  38. Ben, I want to dissect what you’re saying just a little bit more.

    Working class people have legitimate concerns about jobs.

    But why is it that white working class people have historically looked askance at POC and especially immigrants as a suspicious group who might steal their jobs?

    Because the “owning” class takes advantage of those immigrants and puts the current working class out of a job.

    So while I agree that there are legitimate concerns about jobs, those do not translate to concerns about immigrants but about what the owners will do with those immigrants. So, for me, the white working class looking askance at immigrants and being suspicious of them and making immigration the issue only furthers their problems, because it plays the game of the owning class.

    Basically: the owners WANT us to turn on each other. THAT is what they benefit by.

    So I think we really need to encourage those fears of losing jobs where they actually belong, not with immigrants, but with bosses.

  39. I completely agree whatsername. The blame rests with the bosses, and solidarity among all workers is important. I would only add that many Mexican immigrants are purely economically motivated in their migration. They would be happy to stay in their own country if economic conditions were better there. So I don’t think mass immigration from Mexico is some unilateral good. It’s largely indicative of Mexicans being forced off their farms by large multinationals and other corporate, governmental, and organized crime abuses that are currently going on in Mexico.

    Also, I do think mass migrations can be culturally disruptive. This is not entirely a bad thing, but I think it’s naive to look at it as 100% good, too. It can be traumatic living living in a community that was steeped in one culture only to see it suddenly and completely change. Also, it can be traumatic to leave your country and your family just to be able to provide them for a decent standard of living. I believe a equitable, just economy for both the U.S. and Mexico would probably entail reduced immigration, not because of draconian police measures, but because people would be happy where they were.

  40. But if your neighbor is illegal and gets deported–whether after being arrested for drunk driving or for being unlucky enough to have her house broken into–then I have no problem with that.

    What Aunt B said. Anyone’s position on illegal immigration itself aside, this kind of law means both that brown people are going to be targeted by police for breaking “nuisance laws” that white people are not prosecuted for, and that general chaos and crime will increase in neighborhoods where illegal immigrants live because no one wants to run the risk that they or their neighbor will be deported if they call the police.

    Just to make it clearer: Reporting a crime can get you deported. Being a good citizen can get you deported.

    Why is loaded language like “stealing land” only used when the perpetrators are white and the victims brown?

    I’m sorry, could you show me where Hispanic immigrants are forcing whites off American land at gunpoint?

  41. I hesitate to say that a law that makes it easier to catch someone violating a law is racist. Because for all of my love of being black and black people, a criminal is a criinal regardles sof race and should be arrested for breaking the law. But this is obviously racial profiling.

    It’s like pulling over a black man who drives a nice car because he *had* to have stolen it. Running a check on a latina/latino resident to be sure they are here legally is prejudiced. Being brown doesn’t make you an illegal immigrant by default. Many latino/latinas are born here and still more are here legally- temporarily or permanent.

  42. Also, I do think mass migrations can be culturally disruptive.

    Please define “disruptive”. I think it’s worth noting that cultures change regardless. I do not believe that there has ever been a single culture in the history of our species that has steadfastly resisted any major changes. “Our” culture (which, goddammit, is really just an artful hodgepodge, as a lot of people have already said) is going to change, and is changing as we speak. Mass migration will probably accelerate that change, sure, but “disruptive”? That feels like more of a value-judgment.

    This is not entirely a bad thing, but I think it’s naive to look at it as 100% good, too.

    That’s a fine strawman you got there, Ben. No one on this board (and no one I’ve ever heard of) has said that immigration is an unadulterated good, and saying immigration isn’t 100% bad isn’t the same thing. As they say, “there’s good and bad in everything” (save a very small set of exceptions, e.g., literacy, fair trade chocolate, really elaborate handshakes, and the 1600m relay).

    It can be traumatic living living [sic] in a community that was steeped in one culture only to see it suddenly and completely change.

    Traumatic, like “being forced to convert to a new religion under penalty of death or mutilation,” or traumatic, like “having to re-learn how to make new friends”?

    Also, it can be traumatic to leave your country and your family just to be able to provide them [sic] for a decent standard of living.

    Yes.

  43. What a crock of dung this article is. If anyone is racist it’s the pro amnesty illegal alien groups such as La Raza, MALDEF, MECHA, Reconquista, and the Mexican government itself. Americans are isck and tired of defending our immigration laws and protecting our citizens and economy only to be called racist. That argument doesn’t work anymore. We have more than 20 million illegal aliens costing American taxpayers more than 350 billion annually. We have more than 15 million Americans out of work. Americans are losing their jobs and homes yet our government continues to import 1.5 million foreign workers annually. ENOUGH! Unless our government starts representing the AMERICAN people instead of corporations, lobbyists, special interest groups and foreign governments, we could see another American revolution.

  44. Please define ‘disruptive.’ I think it’s worth noting that cultures change regardless. I do not believe that there has ever been a single culture in the history of our species that has steadfastly resisted any major changes. ‘Our’ culture (which, goddammit, is really just an artful hodgepodge, as a lot of people have already said) is going to change, and is changing as we speak. Mass migration will probably accelerate that change, sure, but “disruptive”? That feels like more of a value-judgment.

    By disruptive I meant both to the people of the United States and Mexico, at least certain segments of them. You already acknowledged how the seperation of Mexican families could be traumatic for them. I think that on the U.S. side of the border there’s disruption as well. It’s difficult for adults to learn a new langauge (Spanish or English), especially if they’re overworked, underpaid, and unable to decidate many resources to studying. In many areas of the Southwest not being billingual is becoming a serious handicap. Of course, this is less of a problem for more affluent, educated people. The disruption of traditional social networks can also lead to surrogate support networks, like gangs. Many studies have correlated Increased ethnic diversity with increased crime (not politcally correct to point out, but true–compare the crime rates of Sweden or Japan to Texas).

    I hope no one is interpreting what I’m saying to mean I have some problem with Hispanic culture. My grandmother is from Colombia and I’m billingual in Spanish. I would argue this same point about most migrations, in most periods of history. Mass migrations are normally motivated by hardship and in their playing out cause further hardships. I think many elements of the affluent, educated left can’t see this because they don’t like its ideological implications–maybe the dream of some postmodern, continually transforming, multicultural global utopia isn’t possible, and isn’t in the process of developing.

  45. Oh, of /course/ there’s no racial profiling! The cops don’t have to see that someone is brown or black before they pull them over!

    My father used to have a lowrider Thunderbird, spray-painted black and decorated with racing decals. (Alas, the high price of gas forced him out of his baby just half a year ago.) Wherever he went, the police would be tailing him. Sometimes it was the anti-gang unit; sometimes the regular local force. They’d pull him over and do a spit-take when they saw that it was an elderly Jewish guy inside. “Er, just, eh, making sure you’re okay, uh, sir.” He’d usually call them on it, too, and remind them that racial profiling is not acceptable.

    Oh yeah, and this is all taking place in in the SF Bay Area; I can’t even imagine what it’s like in other places.

  46. @Ben:
    Okay, I think I can see where you’re coming from a little better. I think I’d have to see those crime studies, though. Correlation is a very, very fickle friend.

  47. I just want to take a second and thank the folks who are actually trying to have a good conversation here. I admit to being really troubled by how, in a progressive feminist space, where people talk all the time about the way our system is set up to fuck women over, that there’s this weird resistance to the idea that the system also fucks other (overlapping) groups over, or that, if it does, well, it’s not that troubling.

    It is a fact of human existence that a lot of us are going to suffer and suffer terribly, when we have done nothing wrong, when we are only trying to make our lives better. But THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR IT. Not “well, we have laws,” not “we have a right to protect our culture,” not “they’re stealing jobs,” not nothing.

    I certainly don’t expect everyone to have my pet causes and I’m sure as hell not going to have yours.

    But if you are privileging abstract notions over the real lives of your neighbors, who have not even committed a crime you can go to jail for (it’s not a criminal offense to be in this country illegally; it’s only a civil offense) you need to look hard at that.

    If you believe the system can be stacked against women, that it plays women against each other in order to maintain order, is it really so far a leap to believe that the system is stacked also against poor people and that it plays poor people against each other in order to maintain order? Or that it is stacked against non-white people and uses distinctions like “legal” and “illegal” (among others) to play people against each other?

    Every post at Feministe that is newer than mine right now makes that exact point in one way or another–that we are systematized to distrust and disbelieve each other in ways that are gendered and raced and classed so that the system can remain standing.

    Do you really think every single one of us is blowing smoke up your asses?

  48. @Irene: Regarding your parting claim about the beneficiaries of amnesty programs not being Asian (or Irish), you may be interested to know that while Indian nationals do not make up the largest group of undocumented immigrants in the U.S., they do constitute the fastest-growing group of undocumented immigrants. For whatever that’s worth to you.

    As lots of other people have noted, there are widely different access to visas (travel or longer-term) to the US, so comparing in the abstract whether or not one group of nationals are more likely to travel to the US with visas (and then, whether or not they are more likely to overstay visas) is not an even comparison. And (assuming it’s mention immigrants you curiously refuse to mention in your post, and not Canadians you’re worried about engaging in midnight border-crossings), it’s important to bear in mind that the recent wave of immigrants from Mexico spiked considerably after the passage of NAFTA, which rendered it virtually impossible for subsistence farmers in parts of rural Mexico to eke out a subsistence. Not only is the US economy tied more directly to Mexico’s than to that of many other nations in the world, but US policies more directly influence Mexican immigration patterns than those of several other nations in the world. I’m not proposing that Mexicans should have priority to access to visas, but I am suggesting that it’s not always simple to determine what it might mean for it to “be equal for all who want to enter [the] US.” Currently, not everyone is equal under US law. For one well-known example, if Cuban refugees travel by raft to Florida and manage to set foot on dry land, they are granted legal status. If Haitian refugees travel by raft to Florida and manage to set foot on dry land, they are sent to Krome detention center to be processed and almost always deported, even when they have well-founded fears of returning home that should, in theory, make them admissible under the US’s (less than generous) refugee laws.

  49. Here we ago again. Demonize white men and victimize women and minorities. That’s my opinion of the absurd ‘privilege’ ideology. Adimittley this essay didn’t focus on white men, but I’ve heard enough of this privilege bile to know white men are enemy #1. Say goodbye to the age of individuality and welcome the age of collectivism. No longer am I an individual — I’m the evil white guy subjected to communal blame. If a man rapes — its my fault. If a man beats his wife — its my fault. Kind of reminds me of Hitler and the antisemitic rhetoric he spewed towards Jews. He felt they controlled wealth and blamed them for the economic crisis of then 1930’s.

  50. Hmmm, Cabaret Voltaire, your fears of demonization sound remarkably like the demonizing logic behind Nashville’s adoption of 287(g): if an undocumented immigrant drives drunk, it’s the fault of all undocumented immigrants. If an undocumented immigrant who’s been arrested multiple times for driving drunk but never given a stiff sentence drives drunk again and kills several people, it’s the fault of all immigrants, and they must be deported. It really stinks when everyone in a socially-designated class of people gets demonized because of the actions of a single individual, doesn’t it?

  51. What the hell is up with all the blatant racism and xenophobia in the comments? Jesus Christ! Is this a troll infestation? What’s going on? I shudder to think about what must be in the mod queue.

    Seriously, we’re not even talking the clueless-white-bingo-card stuff. Just straight-up motherfuckin’ racism. Jesus.

  52. I agree with the very first poster, Irene.

    My girlfriend is from Paraguay, and she is here on a student visa. She is trying very hard to make ends met and finish her dream of someday becoming a doctor and a citizen of this country. She has to go to school by day and at night she works at a McDonalds, much to her humiliation. Obviously I have tried to help her all I can, but she simply has absolutely no rights. She is totally legal and keeps all her paperwork up to date. She can’t even work more than 30 hours a week, and is living like a poor person.

    Bottom line is 80% of all the employees she works with have it on easy street because they are from Mexico. They get all kinds of benefits because of all of the lobbyists in Washington and in every state trying to make it easier for them. They have no worries even though they are illegal. If they get fired, they just go somewhere else where people will be glad to hire them because they work hard and keep their moths shut.

    It really pisses me off though that they have more rights as illegals than my girlfrind who is trying to follow all the rules. All of the illegals from Mexico should have the same rules as everyone else in this world who comes into this country. If the rules would apply to them all we would have less burden on the infrastructure, less burden on the health care system, and maybe more people who actually have something to offer besides being a token for “diversity”, could live here and and actually add something valuable.

    Are latinos from Mexico the only ones who carry the banner for diversity in this country? Are they the only ones who have the right to have huge lobbying groups to help them with their rights just because their country happens to border ours?

    And I am not a racist…I have a son who is half asian, have his friends over all the time in my very diverse neighborhood from China, Thailand, and Panama, and then my girlfriend from S.A., so I am FAR from being a racist.

  53. I have feminist cred that goes back a few decades, so I guess I can get on here and comment. I live in Tennessee, near Nashville. I support the 287(g) law enforcement program. Even without it, state and local law enforcement officers have authority under federal law to enforce U.S. immigration laws, and this authority has been affirmed in court cases.

    I am an immigration-control activist. My daughter was injured and suffered serious loss as a result of a car wreck caused by an illegal-alien driver. It was the second time she’d been hit by an illegal alien. Because the second driver did not show up in court and skipped, untraceable in this country, I can only hope the person was eventually nabbed in a 287(g) or related enforcement, because no doubt this would save another family some heartbreak. Let’s be clear on who the real victims are in this scenario.

    When I began studying the effects of massive immigration in this country, one of the first things that hit me was that this drastic change in our traditional immigration numbers was going to hurt, cancel out, what so many of us women had worked for in terms of the world we hoped to leave to our daughters and sons. As it is, immigrants and even illegal aliens, by way of contractors and subcontractors, have hijacked the affirmative- action and minority set-aside programs initiated to redress inequity to our native women, blacks, and American Indians. I watched this happen in state law in Georgia and Tennessee.

    Our native children and legal immigrants themselves are being forced to compete with millions of foreign workers brought in to satisfy business interests that want low-wage legal and illegal labor that WE subsidize in corporate subsidies for the businesses and in Medicaid and other welfare for the imported labor.

    Our nation cannot sustain what is going on. Our daughters and our sons have been cheated.

  54. Mike – illegal is an adjective, not a noun. I think perhaps the term you want is “undocumented immigrant,” unless, of course, you like using racist language.

    Oh, but that’s right, it can’t be racist language because you have friends from other continents and therefore can’t be a racist. *eyeroll*

  55. wednesday: Oh, how cute! One of those roving vocabulary police!

    Adjective or noun, illegal still means “against the law”, meaning here without a proper visa of any kind. And when did the word “illegal” become racist language? Is illegal U-turn a racist statement as well?

  56. “Our native children and legal immigrants themselves are being forced to compete with millions of foreign workers brought in to satisfy business interests that want low-wage legal and illegal labor that WE subsidize in corporate subsidies for the businesses and in Medicaid and other welfare for the imported labor.”

    May be you want to pay higher prices for food! May be you have a lot of money. I dont have that kind of money. You are a moron. Most so-called immigration control activists dont know what the hell they are talking about. Do you know anything about imported food or outsourcing, moron? May be you need to get out of the south first. Your brain is dead!

  57. “Our nation cannot sustain what is going on. Our daughters and our sons have been cheated.”

    Get off your ass and compete! Tough luck! It is a global economy..you are the scumbag who wants white privilege and does not like competition!

  58. And while you are at it , Donna Locke, try to pay off the national debt..the country does not belong to you until you pay the debt..it is just like a mortgage on the house!

  59. Whew, nothing like immigration to bring out the hate in people. On this blog, though, it really takes me by surprise. I can’t even begin to respond to the vengeful and completely illogical comments above because there are so many and it’s so upsetting. 287(g) is the 21st century equivalent of driving while black (not that that is exactly defunct): except the crime is “living in America while Latino.”

  60. George, you are uninformed. Studies have been done on the impact on price of lettuce, etc., if the imported labor our country is addicted to were drastically reduced. Studies show a temporary hike in price followed by lower prices as mechanization and other advancements currently on hold because of aforementioned addiction take over. The United States is actually lagging behind other countries in such mechanization.

    Massive immigration, legal and illegal, which is overpopulating our country to projected unsustainable numbers, is actually creating the need for many of the jobs these folks fill!

    No, George, my kids cannot compete with some of the stuff going on. In our family we have seen one relative fired from an IT job and forced to train his foreign replacement who was imported to work at much lower pay. You apparently know nothing about this common practice, but I won’t call you a moron.

    We have another guy in the family and another guy, a friend of mine, who lost their construction contracting businesses because they would NOT employ illegal labor and were underbid by those who did, because the latter paid their workers less.

    I won’t get into the unfair competition imposed by the hijacking of U.S. affirmative action and minority set-aside programs.

    And I won’t get into your bigotry against Southerners, George, but I’d put my IQ up against yours any day.

    According to Census and other welfare statistics, the United States is approaching (forced) support of the majority of American residents by a minority of Americans. This is a recipe for revolution. We will see who the morons are then, George — you and your ilk or the people who saw this disaster coming 30 years ago and tried to warn their fellow Americans.

    And by the way, the premise of the original post here by Betsy Phillips is illogical, because illegal aliens of all nationalities and races are here, and all are subject to deportation and have been deported, and Canadians and European whites stand a greater chance of deported if caught because they haven’t the massive funding of the Latino open-borders groups, MALDEF, etc., that swing into action and fight deportation of Latinos.

    More Latinos are deported because illegal migration to our country is coming overwhelmingly from Latin America, and most of that is from Mexico.

    I suggest you familiarize yourself with the work of the Center for Immigration Studies, cis.org, and NumbersUSA. numbersusa.com.

  61. Can we have a civil debate and stop calling people morons and the like because they express views that are very different to ours?

    I am in the UK so I don’t know enough about Mexican immigration to comment on some of the arguments above. However I know in the UK immigrants, both legal and illegal do many of the jobs that people born here don’t want to do. Without immigrants many of the crucial but horrible jobs like fruit picking would go unfilled.

    But large scale immigration can present challenges as well. As a young child I went to a school that was one third Asian immigrants which was fine. But my friends white daughter went to a local school where her child was the only British born child and the children all spopke Urdu in the playground, not English. Her daughter felt very isolated as a result and her mother removed her and sent her to another more mixed school.

    I’m sure her mother would be called racist by some people for doing this, but such large scale immigration does cause real problems between individuals. That said this is a very rare situation. There are only a handful of places in the UK where the local population has such a high proportion of immigrants and as I understand, overall immigration in America is pretty low.

    To the poster who said we wouldn’t be eating pizza, pasta, tacos, etc if it wasn’t for immigrants. I don’t know in America, but in the UK pizza and pasta became popular through foreign holidays, not immigration. These food items became popular at a time when few people had, in the UK ever met anyone Italian except on holiday. Tacos came to the UK largely through the american fast food culture and chains such as Taco Bell.

    Just wanted to point out that foreign influences on cultures come through a wide number of ways, not just immigration. And this has always been the case. For example in the UK, influence on our architecture in the 18th and 19th century was often through eccliastical travellers who had visited cathedrals in Europe.

  62. Word of advice to most of the posters on this board: Jumping to the racist card doesn’t help your cause any; it’s a kneejerk reaction as full of assumptions as the very positions you are criticizing.

    Sometimes a stance on immigration law is merely that — a stance on immigration law. Not a racist remark, not xenophobic, not anti-labor, not anti-Hispanic, not inhuman — just a stance on how immigration should be handled in this country.

    No country could sustain itself without some form of immigration control. Period. There is no question that our immigration system needs reform. But framing this as a racial or cultural war isn’t helpful.

    And please don’t respond with something like:

    “Go back to your own country with your intolerance – or did you forget your ancestors raped and pillaged the natives and that you’re actually not an American?”

    My ancestors did nothing of the sort. My parents were legal immigrants. And yes, I AM actually American.

  63. Joe, just because your immigrant ancestors didn’t rape and pillage doesn’t mean most of the immigrants to this country didn’t. They did. There is a reason why after immigrants started landing on the east coast that the population of American Indians went down NINETY PERCENT IN TWENTY YEARS in those areas. I don’t know for sure, because I haven’t studied my ancestors history at length, but as I have German and Norwegian and Irish and Spanish immigrant ancestors, I’m sure some of them were responsible for the same. I’m quite sure the Mexican Indian blood that runs through my veins is not there because of a happy union between Indian and Spanish.

    And yes, compared to American Indians I’m NOT a real American, and no, neither are you.

    Getting indignant at someone for pointing out the no duh obviousness of that fact is silly, and doesn’t do you “any favors” either.

    Living in Oakland you should know better than this, this is a city built on radical community organizing AND that has quite a few resources and organizations for what indigenous community is left around here.

  64. Joe in Oakland: The current debate/dialogue/tenor of discussion on immigration definitely presents itself as “a cultural war.” Anyone paying attention knows that. And yes, that last sentence was technically an Appeal to Ignorance. Purposefully constructed. Peace.

  65. Dear “whatsername”:

    You said: “Joe, just because your immigrant ancestors didn’t rape and pillage doesn’t mean most of the immigrants to this country didn’t.”

    And your point is? First of all that statement is obviously false, but whatever. Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that’s it’s true. Say, that the majority of immigrants to the USA did do some degree of raping and pillaging. What’s your point? How does that inform a debate about immigration reform?

    You said: “And yes, compared to American Indians I’m NOT a real American, and no, neither are you.”

    Explain to me just how useful this argument or line of thinking is, and consider why what you just said might be considered truly offensive. I’m a liberal-minded, well-educated ethnic minority and proud citizen of Oakland. I value diversity in every respect and love that I live in a place where I can learn and benefit from a myriad of cultures. That said, seriously people — quit with the “This isn’t your country” arguments. Seriously. Not because it’s not based in truth–I’m not a moron; I know that American Indians were conquered and it’s hugely unjust–but because it’s a moot point and is only used to evoke an emotional reaction during debates that have nothing to do with the settling of America.

    Seriously, what do you want me to do with that argument? Okay, so you think you and I aren’t as American as, say, someone with partial or full ties to a native tribe. I respectfully disagree, but you can believe whatever you want. In my humble opinion, my level of “American-ism” is based on my citizenship–my nationality. I was born here. My parents weren’t. But we’re all American citizens. In my opinion, I am no more American than they are, and my American Indian neighbor is no more “American” than any of us. We are all equally “American.” But if you want to encourage more division in our communities by suggesting that some are more worthy of the title of “American” than others, then go for it.

    In any case, the status of American Indians in this country is a moot point when it comes to this particular discussion. What are you going to do, overthrow the country and hand it back to the reservations? Rename the country? Move all descendants of early settlers back to Europe? Of course not. So ask yourself, just how useful is this line of thinking? You make an interesting, though divisive, point. Now what do you want me to do with it?

    You also said: “Living in Oakland you should know better than this” – Okay… Better than what? What have I said that is so ignorant or wrong?

    So I believe that those who enter this country illegally have no legal right to be here. This is a fact, not an opinion. I will go further, though, and opine that this is how it should be. If I illegally entered, say, South Africa, or if I went there but stayed past my visa’s expiration, that would be my fault, and I would expect that I would have to face the consequences—deportation, fines, paperwork, possible incarceration. No country could exist or maintain its security without some sort of immigration control. Would you prefer open borders and unregulated population flow? I do feel for the families of those involved, particularly as these situations too often involve children and the eventual splitting of families. I feel compassion for these families, trust me I do. And I’m not one of those morons who believes that illegal immigrants are all criminals or deadbeats. But, that said, there are channels (that admittedly must be reformed and streamlined) for legal immigration. To tolerate immigration of any other kind is, at its most innocuous, a slap in the face to those who immigrated legally, and at its most dangerous, a serious national security issue.

    Yes, immigration reform is emotional and drenched in racial and cultural overtones. I’m not denying that those are intrinsic aspects of this debate. What I am arguing is that there are enough of those aspects to this debate already and that to fuel those flames with race-baiting and divisive talk isn’t helpful to anyone.

Comments are currently closed.