I’ve worked in and around sexuality for the past 8 years of my life, in capacities ranging from researching the history of gay bathhouses in nineteenth century New York to touching stranger’s penises for money to editing and producing blogs and video podcasts about sexuality. I’ve been around the block and then some. This means, among other things, that thinking about sexuality on a daily, hourly, minutely basis doesn’t have an erotic charge for me – I don’t feel titillated by sitting in a meeting and talking about comprehensive sexuality education, I don’t get turned on when I edit a writer’s tale of a night in a strip club. Thinking about sexuality is my career, it’s my life’s work. This doesn’t, of course, mean that all things sexual elicit no response for me – but it does mean that I have a clear sense of when things are sexy or sexual and when they are not.
This sense, however, doesn’t seem to be one that a lot of other people have.
For example: I’m co-hosting a new reading series in NYC called Sex Worker Literati, which features stories and performances by people who’ve worked in the sex industry. These stories are sometimes about some kind of sex taking place, but they are frequently *not* sexy. Because really, the act of providing an erotic experience for a living is not always that arousing to the person doing the providing. It’s a job.
So of course I rolled my eyes at this obnoxious comment on our Facebook event page:
Is anybody putting out, or all talk, no action.
Maybe I’m a cranky feminist who needs to get laid more, but I think it is really important to have language to talk about sexuality that isn’t itself coded as sexual. So no, dear douchebag commenter, no one is “putting out” (and that phrase is such a lovely way to frame the female experience of sexuality. shudder). And, dear douchebag commenter, you’ll probably find that these stories are not good masturbation fodder either.
In my 7 Key American Sex Worker Activist Projects post last week, I briefly mentioned that I think it’s important to cast salacious representations of sexuality in a different light than representations that attempt to get at the depths and complexities of sexuality.
Unfortunately, as much as sexsexsex is all over our culture in neon lights, the discussion often leaves something to be desired (pun intended). This means that, among other things, people who attempt to discuss sexuality in serious, non-erotic ways get mocked or dismissed or encouraged to sex it up. And while there certainly is a place and time for sexuality to be sexy (there is, after all, nothing *wrong* with enjoying an erotic turn-of-phrase), it’s crucial for there to be spaces where sex talk doesn’t have to be sexy or sexual.