In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

“Wow! She’s fat!”

At first, I was taken aback by the Village Voice article on the new Dove ad campaign, as it starts with calling the model “fat.” But what I like about it is that it admits that when many of us (myself included) see an ad with an average-sized woman, there’s a moment of shock. Then there’s a moment of, “Yeah, right on!”

So, we’re walking down the Bowery a week or so ago and we see that Dove poster everyone is talking about, the one with a indisputably voluptuous “real” woman posing in her underwear and before we can censor ourselves we murmur practically out loud, “Wow! She’s fat!” and then we’re instantly ashamed because of course we’re too politically correct to ever think that for real except—we did.

In fact, this beaming, frankly fleshy model, big as she is, is a lot younger than we are and let’s face it, in truth she is no fatter than we are—and she looks to be in far better shape.

Though we like to think of ourselves as the most progressive person on earth, it turns out we are a lot more similar to most people than we care to admit: We, like everyone else, are so accustomed to looking at skinny, skinny women in magazines, on television, in movies, and virtually every place else that when we’re confronted with someone of a normal weight she seems completely freakish. So insidious, so poisonous is the tyranny of the super-thin that we recoil, if only for a second, at the sight of an average woman on a billboard.

Who could have predicted that when people in highly developed countries had more than enough to eat, the result would be a bizarre combination of widespread obesity and rampant self-starvation?

The rest of it gets a little shallow, but it’s an interesting read regardless.


20 thoughts on “Wow! She’s fat!”

  1. So insidious, so poisonous is the tyranny of the super-thin that we recoil, if only for a second, at the sight of an average woman on a billboard.

    This speaks volumes about our culture.

  2. Anne, indeed. And this…

    In fact, this beaming, frankly fleshy model, big as she is, is a lot younger than we are and let’s face it, in truth she is no fatter than we are—and she looks to be in far better shape.

    …left a little smirk on my face.

  3. So I guess the solution is to stop watching television, (certain) movies, and reading fashion magazines.

    I do like these advertisements. But I don’t think any of the women are fat. Am I missing something?

  4. Hmmm. It still says 3 comments, although mine is the fourth one there. I had a feeling that my comments didn’t count. 🙂

  5. My first thought was, “Whoa, healthy women!” None of them are “fat” and actually I’d say most of them are at the slender end of healthy. I find them much more attractive than the anorexic-looking models generally used for ads, because these women actually look healthy, not sick.

  6. I don’t think any of them are fat, either. I’d heard about the ads before I saw one, and when I finally did I kept squinting at the TV, trying to see what in hell people were talking about. I still don’t get it.

  7. I think the add campaign is about “real women” as opposed to the typical “thin” model we are more accustomed to seeing in adds.

  8. interesting… i don’t think most men would even have that harsh a visceral reaction. women can really be self-enforcing skinny worshippers, and it’s good that you consciously fight your way back to sensibility! do women reflexively judge male models in a similar fashion, ie muslce and hair?

  9. I’ve just been having a think and a write about Dove myself. What really worries me as a feminist is the fact that in 2005 the sight of a few normal looking women is so startling and radical for people. It’s depressing. We should have come a lot further than this by now.

  10. There is one aspect of weight and appearance I rarely see discussed. (I’m not sure I’ve ever seen it discussed, come to think of it.) People who have been large for a long time have facial muscles that go with the size their face is accustomed to being. Significant weight loss sometimes seems to have an odd effect on facial expression. The faces don’t look quite right; they look strained or angry or something. (I can’t quite put my finger on what the problem is.)

  11. I had a very funny reaction. I thought, “EWwww!” because I just though the ads were so ugly, and the women so unattractive. And then I thought, “What’s up with THAT reaction, fat chick?”

    I much prefer the glossy bodacious babes of the Lane Bryant ads to the flat-footed plain girls of the Dove ad. All in all, though, I appreciate their shaking things up.

    Not that I’ll start buying Dove products, of course.

  12. As an editor of science fiction anthologies, I go to a lot of science fiction conventions. How to say this? People in the sf community tend to have BMIs on the high side. That woman is not fat. You want to see fat? I’ve seen hips like those on the patheolithic venus figurines. The sf literary agent I used to work for had a Body Mass Index of about 64. (I’m not kidding; I did the math).

    That Dove woman is not fat.

  13. You’re right — the Dove woman isn’t fat. And I think that’s what the Voice article is getting at. She isn’t fat, but when we see a healthy, normal-sized woman on a billboard or on TV — places where we’re accustomed to seeing impossibly skinny women — the immediate reaction for many people is to think, “Wow, she’s fat!” We probably wouldn’t think she was fat if we saw her walking down the street, but place her in an ad and it’s such a change from what we’re used to that it throws us off.

    So my point wasn’t that she’s actually fat. It’s that how we perceive “fat” shifts given who we’re evaluating, and where they’re placed.

  14. IMHO I think porn and emaciated super models, as well as shit-head marketing execs are skewing what a normal, healthy woman is supposed to look like, smell like, act like… etc.

    First it was FDS & thongs. Now all the rage is anal/sphincter bleaching. Oh it’s skewing!

  15. PeaceBang, part of the reason why the images themselves are less than “appealing” is because they are un-edited and un-retouched. That’s part of the “point” of the campaign.

  16. Pingback: seriously. wtf.

Comments are currently closed.