I’ll be honest and admit that I’m not entirely sure what to say about this, what with the fucked up-ness seeming so obvious. But for the sake of completion, since Feministe did cover the shoe-throwing incident on multiple levels, I felt obligated to put it up.
Last week, an Egyptian man offered his daughter to the Iraqi shoe-thrower Muntazer al-Zaidi.
An Egyptian man said Wednesday he was offering his 20-year-old daughter in marriage to Iraqi journalist Muntazer al-Zaidi, who threw his shoes at U.S. President George W. Bush in Baghdad Sunday,
The daughter, Amal Saad Gumaa, said she agreed with the idea. “This is something that would honour me. I would like to live in Iraq, especially if I were attached to this hero,” she told Reuters by telephone.
Her father, Saad Gumaa, said he had called Dergham, Zaidi’s brother, to tell him of the offer. “I find nothing more valuable than my daughter to offer to him, and I am prepared to provide her with everything needed for marriage,” he added.
Aw, look! See, he thinks is daughter is valuable! Isn’t that sweet?
Uh, yeah, sure it would be, if “value” wasn’t so closely equated with “ownership” — and property is exactly what the daughter is being treated as. I am not going to get into sticky questions of the woman’s agency if she says that she’s fine with the idea — frankly, I’m shocked that anyone asked for her opinion at all — since we have no way of knowing how she feels other than to ask her, and we have no way of knowing how honest she would be in a public statement to the international press.
What we can say is that with her father doing the offering, with her permission and blessing or not, she’s sure as hell not being treated like she has any agency. So let it suffice for me to loosely quote Haley, of Egyptian background herself, from the email she sent me with the link for this story: “Yay for women as property!” — not to mention prizes and rewards.