In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

links for 11-09-2011

College midterms have finally released me from their clutches, so here is a long overdue link round-up !
Here is a mishmash of articles published over the last week you should read.

A review of a book by feminist Phyllis Chesler on how MRAs are eking into the family court system and changing the game for mothers

A primer over at the Root explaining why you should care about new voting laws.

Amanda Hess at GOOD talks about the gap between the perception of what makes a sexual harassment suit and what actually does.

When it comes to Herman Cain , the Root has a fairly extensive coverage. Check it out – starting with this, on why his use of ‘lynching’ is offensive.

On fat representation on TV : Not Settling for Chelsea Settles

In #Occupy-related articles :
Race and Occupy Wall Street at the Nation

Flavia at Tiger Beatdown details why the US Occupy rhetoric is problematic when used in Europe.
Occupy London (Ontario) has been dismantled by the police, but is moving to a new site. Occupy Vancouver is still in the midst of a legal storm.
“Jayna Brown and Jack Halberstam exchange ideas about the London Riots, Occupy Wall Street/Occupy LA, Anarchy, uprisings, looting and the folly of Zizek”

If you haven’t been following Occupy Writers, you should start.

Also ! In events you might want to check out : French filmmaker Celine Sciamma’s second feature Tomboy (after Water Lilies) is opening in select theatres across the US. It follows a child named Laure who starts introducing hirself as Michael when hir family moves – and the movie is absolutely gorgeous. Dates can be found here!
And if you are in NYC and can come to the hinterland of the Columbia campus, come listen to Samuel Delany, fantastic sci-fi author and critic this friday.

Congratulations, Mississippi. You’re up…. rest of the country.

More than 55 percent of Mississippi voters agreed that no, in fact, zygotes are zygotes and women are women, and women get to make choices about women’s lives and health. Such that they were already allowed to, anyway. Raise a glass to Mississippi,* and cross your fingers that today’s defeat can build momentum toward the defeat of bills like this nationwide.

*My glass currently contains vanilla vodka and Fanta Zero, neither of which would be any good for a growing blastocytizen, so it’s a good thing I have an IUD. Sláinte!

Common Sense Time.

So Congressional GOP members want to extend Mississippi’s asinine personhood amendment to the whole country. Caperton wrote about the Mississippi bill, and detailed many of the ridiculous ways it will interfere with basic rights — one of the goals of the bill is to outlaw many forms of birth control, and it will undoubtedly be used to criminally prosecute women who miscarry. Jessica Valenti also wrote a must-read article for the Washington Post.

Oh but it gets better! In a very good Mother Jones article about the bill, Nick Baumann (whose coverage of this has been excellent) explains:

Sixty-three House Republicans, or over a quarter of the GOP conference, are cosponsors of HR 212, Rep. Paul Broun’s (R-Ga.) “Sanctity of Human Life Act,” which includes language that directly parallels that of the Mississippi personhood amendment. That bill declares that “the life of each human being begins with fertilization, cloning, or its functional equivalent…at which time every human being shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood.”

Read More…Read More…

Deus Vult: “God Wills It”

This is a guest post by Laurie and Debbie.
Believers in a Judeo-Christian god must, by definition, believe that the world was designed by that god as (s)he wished it to be. The Latin phrase is “Deus Vult,” translated literally as “God wills it.” In this context, let’s contrast a popular (although far from universal) Christian view of sexuality with what’s known about the animal kingdom:

So if the accusations against Herman Cain are true…

…and I have no idea if they are… he didn’t just “sexually harass” the latest accuser, or engage in “lewd behavior.” He sexually assaulted her.

During that trip, she said Mr. Cain had secretly upgraded her hotel room before drinks and dinner that the two had to discuss possible future employment. She said that after dinner, he put his hand on her leg and ran it under her skirt and pulled her head toward his crotch.

True or not, let’s call the accusations what they are.

Men Call Me Things

Have you ever wondered what it’s like to spend a day in the glamorous life of a feminist blogger? Check out #mencallmethings on Twitter, which was started by Sady Doyle. (Trigger warning for rape, violence and misogyny).

xx your favorite lesbian hambeast

Or maybe just don’t beat your kids.

Well this is disturbing, and I hope someone sues the hell out of these folks (alternately, I hope that they’re criminally prosecuted).

The pastoral mood in the hills of Tennessee offered a stark contrast to the storm raging around the country over the Pearls’ teachings on child discipline, which advocate systematic use of “the rod” to teach toddlers to submit to authority. The methods, seen as common sense by some grateful parents and as horrific by others, are modeled, Mr. Pearl is fond of saying, on “the same principles the Amish use to train their stubborn mules.”

Michael Pearl advocates beating your children. He thinks you should start hitting them when they’re about six months old.

More than 670,000 copies of the Pearls’ self-published book are in circulation, and it is especially popular among Christian home-schoolers, who praise it in their magazines and on their Web sites. The Pearls provide instructions on using a switch from as early as six months to discourage misbehavior and describe how to make use of implements for hitting on the arms, legs or back, including a quarter-inch flexible plumbing line that, Mr. Pearl notes, “can be rolled up and carried in your pocket.”

The furor in part reflects societal disagreements over corporal punishment, which conservative Christians say is called for in the Bible and which many Americans consider reasonable up to a point, even as many parents and pediatricians reject it. The issue flared recently when a video was posted online of a Texas judge whipping his daughter.

Mr. Pearl, 66, and Mrs. Pearl, 60, say that blaming their book for extreme abuse by a few unstable parents is preposterous and that they explicitly counsel against acting in anger or causing a bruise. They say that their methods, properly used, yield peace and happy teenagers.

Don’t some religious extremists say the same thing about wife-beating — it’s ok as long as you don’t leave a mark?

Shockingly, some parents have followed the Pearls’ advice — and their kids have ended up dead.

In the latest case, Larry and Carri Williams of Sedro-Woolley, Wash., were home-schooling their six children when they adopted a girl and a boy, ages 11 and 7, from Ethiopia in 2008. The two were seen by their new parents as rebellious, according to friends.

Late one night in May this year, the adopted girl, Hana, was found face down, naked and emaciated in the backyard; her death was caused by hypothermia and malnutrition, officials determined. According to the sheriff’s report, the parents had deprived her of food for days at a time and had made her sleep in a cold barn or a closet and shower outside with a hose. And they often whipped her, leaving marks on her legs. The mother had praised the Pearls’ book and given a copy to a friend, the sheriff’s report said. Hana had been beaten the day of her death, the report said, with the 15-inch plastic tube recommended by Mr. Pearl.

“It’s a good spanking instrument,” Mr. Pearl said in the interview. “It’s too light to cause damage to the muscle or the bone.”

Some of the Williamses’ other tactics also seemed to involve Pearl advice taken to extremes; the Pearls say that “a little fasting is good training,” for example, and suggest hosing off a child who has potty-training lapses. The Williamses have pleaded not guilty and are awaiting trial.

Several other Christian families have also killed their children by beating them (interestingly, many of the murdered children were adoptees, and many of the families homeschoolers). Amanda actually highlighted the culture of Christian child abuse last week, and her post is worth a read. Obviously not all (or even most) Christians beat their kids, but conservative Christian leaders have made the right to hit your kids an Important Religious Rights Issue. Pearl himself says, “To give up the use of the rod is to give up our views of human nature, God, eternity.”

Children are people too, though, and they deserve the basic right to be free from bodily harm.

Shameless Self-Promotion Sunday

Post a short description of something you’ve written this week, along with a link. Make it specific — don’t just link your whole blog.

Threat of the Day

Alyssa Rosenberg has a great idea — share the threats you get for the crime of Blogging While Female on Twitter, with the hastag #ThreatoftheDay. If you know the name of the person leaving the threatening comment, use it. And duh here is our theme song, via Spencer:

Female bloggers receiving threats isn’t new; what’s interesting is how mundane it’s become. I delete horrific comments from our mod queue nearly every day; if there’s a post that attracts a lot of outside-the-feminist-sphere readership, I might be deleting dozens of comments in a day. It doesn’t really faze me anymore. When I initially read Alyssa’s tweets about being told she should get slapped, my reaction was basically, “huh.” Not because that isn’t a horrible thing, but because it’s become so normal.

Now I’m registering how messed up that reaction is. It’s a necessary defense mechanism — I couldn’t get on the internet and write every day if I wasn’t able to let this stuff roll off my back — but the fact that in order to succeed as a female blogger you need to develop skin like steel is… not ok.

Everyone gets a share of hate on the internet. And “commenters can be total dicks” is not news. But women are attacked in very particular ways. If you’re a man, you get “Fuck you, you asshole.” If you’re a woman you get — trigger warning! — “You dumb cunt, you deserve to be raped.” In my first few years of blogging, I found those comments incredibly disturbing and unnerving; eventually, they became so much a part of my daily routine that they barely even register. Of course, when threats escalate — when I see that members of anti-feminist forums are trying to track down my home address, or when a regular troll starts emailing me constantly about how he’s going to destroy my life and then starts contacting my employer, or when strangers on internet forums claim they know where to find me and their compatriots suggest that I deserve a good raping, or when someone elsewhere on the internet decides to start an “Official Jill Filipovic RAPE thread” — I get slightly more upset. I’ve still gotta leave my house, though, so I kind of just acclimate to it (I’m also extremely protective of my personal information). What else are you going to do?

Here at Feministe we save the funniest comments for our Next Top Troll competition (something that is coming soon!). But we also get a lot of un-funny, straight-up disturbing comments that I delete and try not to think about. I’ve saved a handful of them, though, over the past two or three months. They’re below the fold. They aren’t the worst comments we’ve ever received, and most of them aren’t threats exactly. But they’re ugly, and they’re mostly gendered (although there’s one about Jews in there too) — they aren’t the kinds of “fuck you” comments that your average dude blogger receives, I don’t think (although I could be wrong; I haven’t seen their mod queues). Anyway, this hardly an exhaustive list, since I just straight-up delete most of the really bad stuff so that I never have to look at it again. But here’s a little taste of what we get every day (and this is common sense, but obviously if you don’t want to read threats about violence, including sexual violence, don’t click through):

Read More…Read More…