In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Things to do on Black Friday that don’t involve shopping

I’ve done Black Friday once. Once. In my thirty years. I was 22, there was an artificial Christmas tree I’d seen in a circular, and so my mom and I threw on coats over our PJs, stood outside of Kohl’s at 5:45 a.m., bolted straight to the back of the store, and picked up only those impulse items that were on a straight line from the artificial Christmas tree section directly back to the checkout counter. Then we went home, removed our coats, and went back to bed.

I think one reason I hate Black Friday so desperately is that when I worked for the fashion publication that, as always, shall remain nameless, I had the pleasant job of heading to the mall every weekend during the holiday season for the weekly retail roundup. I got to drag a poor photographer who’d rather be hanging Christmas decorations with his young children around this massive Shopping Center of Earthly Delights, tackling shoppers who also would rather be hanging holiday decorations with their families and asking them what they’re buying and how shopping this year compares to shopping last year. Hell, I would rather have been home with my fish hanging Christmas decorations, or Hannukah decorations, or any other damned kind of decorations than stumble for hours around that Bosch painting of a mall to collect my quotes and then go home and get my story filed in time for my editor to maybe remember to include it in that week’s roundup.

So I make a concerted effort to stay in on Black Friday, contribution to our nation’s flagging economy be damned.

For anyone else planning lock the doors, close the shutters, and stay in their homes, bunker-style, from doorbuster to midnight madness, here are a few suggestions from my own playbook.

Read More…Read More…

Things to Not Put on a Tampon

Vodka.

I’m also 97% sure that “putting vodka on a tampon and then getting drunk through your vagina (or butt)” is an urban legend on par with Rainbow Parties. Has someone probably tried it once or twice? Surely. Human beings are both amazing and awful (and amazingly awful). We are the best creatures, and we are endlessly creative when it comes to doing mind-numbingly stupid things. You know who is a good example of someone who is amazingly awful? Danielle Crittenden. Apparently when she’s not refusing to get on airplanes because brown people are boarding or making a career out of complaining about the women’s movement that enabled her to have a career complaining about the women’s movement, she is testing out the vodka-tampon theory and then acting shocked when it burns. And she didn’t even get drunk! Clearly she should have tried the Diva Cup. That holds a lot more liquid.

You know what else burns? The stupid.

Posted in Uncategorized

Someone needs a hobby.

Oh Prudie, you get the most special letter-writers:

Q. Animal Abuse?: Is it animal abuse if the owners of three dogs constantly denigrate their largest, least intelligent dog? They love all three of their pooches, and they shower each dog with affection, but because their largest least intelligent dog is always desperate for attention, they often call him an idiot and make fun of him. Not always to his face, but sometimes to his face. When they make fun of him to his face, they make fun of him in a sing-song voice so he thinks they’re being nice to him. It makes me uncomfortable. Is this animal abuse?

Someone take that dog away from its evil owners! Are those assholes under the impression that the dog doesn’t speak English or something?

The Walking Dead: How not to minimize liabilities in a zombie apocalypse

Okay, The Walking Dead. I’ve been giving you a lot of passes. The horrible, awful accents. The fact that they were right there at the CDC and nobody thought, Hey, maybe we should stop off for some firearms and SUVs before we leave town, seeing as how Decatur has the greatest number of early-model Broncos with mud tires and a gun rack per capita of any municipality in Georgia. The fact that a show called The Walking Dead hasn’t had more than about three actual walking dead an episode since the beginning of the season. The fact that Daryl, basically the only character on the show with any sense, hasn’t been elected boss, general, and emperor-for-life of their little band. The fact that the entire crew could be in Fort Benning by now if they’d just lay off waiting for–and risking their lives over and over again to track down–one kid who, while cute, didn’t follow instructions and has been nothing but a liability. The solid half-hour of taaaalk talktalktalktalktalktalk every. Single. Episode. The awful, horrible accents. You’ve gotten a lot of leeway from me, show.

But we’re halfway through the second season now, and my patience, my willingness to suspend disbelief, and the handle of Popov I keep just for drinking games are all getting low. I got some stuff to say to you, show, and you’re going to hear about it after the jump, wherein there will be spoilers for S02, E06 (Secrets).

Read More…Read More…

“One Abuse Script with Many Faces”

We’ve been discussing gaslighting as an abuse tactic in two previous posts in response to this article by Yashar Ali who reassures us that we ladies are not crazy (thanks). In the first, Caperton dissects Ali’s message directly and the problems with male allies presenting problems analyzed by feminists as new and novel issues. In the second, I tried to clarify the definition of gaslighting and invited the readership to share their own personal experiences with this form of emotional abuse, for one because it’s a tool commonly used by abusers in abusive relationships, and two because it’s so often used against women. What bothered me was that Ali’s explanation of gaslighting chalked it up to what we commonly experience as everday sexism, when in reality gaslighting is a particularly insidious form of emotional abuse that primes abuse victims to accept increasing levels of abuse.

I discussed this briefly with Captain Awkward for her insight, in part because she so extensively discusses the importance of boundaries at her blog, and as she wisely put it in our correspondence, “You need a power differential (patriarchy, for example) for true gaslighting – it relies on power and stereotypes.” In a typical heteronormative abuse model, for example, this form of emotional abuse is often levied against women by men, and it works precisely because of prejudices about femininity and masculinity — that women are nervous, hysterical, less prone to intelligent reasoning, and need protected and corrected by a rational man who is not swayed by his emotions. Of course this isn’t true across the board — it happens frequently in abusive same-sex relationships and parent-child relationships (which exploits the child’s dependent status) as well.

Because gaslighting is part and parcel of a larger system of abuse, it can be difficult to tease out exact incidents and outcomes and differentiate them from the larger experience of the abusive relationship. Some commenters expressed confusion over lying versus gaslighting, and whether this is something that is always conscious or whether it can be subconscious as well. “Gaslighting” is a colloquial term and not a clinical one (Practitioners, is there an official recognition of this behavior?), so there is some disagreement on how it’s applied. For our discussion, I consider gaslighting to be a repeat, systematic series of lies that are designed to make the victim doubt her reality. It’s not one lie or two lies, it’s part of a pattern of abuse meant to make the victim more compliant to minimize the effects of abuse, accept blame, and accept the abuser’s version of events that are contrary to her own. In other words, it’s death by a thousand cuts.

Gaslighting can be intentional, such as with the example from the play and its movie adaptations, or the example I use here, where a partner purposely moves or hides your stuff to make you feel forgetful and untethered to your memory.

Gaslighting can also be an unintentional side-effect, as a classic outcome of living with a narcissist, or with a partner who is trying to cover up their pattern of abuse, or with the addict trying to cover up their addiction. It is done in order to preserve the … [gaslighter’s] vision of himself” as an honest and upstanding person without actually doing the things that would make it so.

Gaslighting can be physical or emotional. An example of physical gaslighting is the example from the movie or from my example in comments. An anonymous reader emailed me with this horrifying example of physical gaslighting:

I knew someone who lived in his mother-in-law’s house and would do things like reorder the kitchen cabinets (switching the plates to the opposite side of the room) to make her think she was going crazy in the hopes that he could have her committed to a home and he could get the house.

For a sidebar discussion, I’ve heard a practitioner say that this kind of gaslighting is so vindictive and insidious that if someone is pulling a physical gaslight on you and you’re able to identify it, drop everything and run the other way and never stop running from this person.

An example of emotional gaslighting is evident in the recollection of CurrerBell in comments, where the denial of abuse was encouraged in her childhood home in order to preserve peace with a trigger-prone mother.

It’s not limited to interpersonal relationships either. As smash points out in the comments, an example was highlighted recently in Ask Prudie where a guy is bullied by his coworkers, who tell him he has bad breath and harangue him about it at work, while his dentist and doctor tell him there is no issue at all.

Overall, gaslighting has the gradual effect of making the victim anxious, confused, and less able to trust their own memory and perception, which makes you less likely to fight back or feel confident accusing the abuser of bad faith later when he’s siphoning money off of you, for example, or isolating you from your friends and family. And later, when your work and school performance suffers because of the nagging dread you have at home, your abuser blames it on the shortcomings he’s defined you by, so it’s your fault that you’re stupid and unreliable, which is why no one likes you and you’re ugly and you can’t even pick up the cat right. The pattern of lying and denial is meant to make you more susceptible to validating their version of events, and it’s almost always a version where the abuser is the sympathetic party and the victim is a dumb, petty asshole for concentrating on who did what when. It’s meant to tear you down and it’s often effective because you are trying to fight fair with someone who is intentionally slippery. As part of a larger system of abuse, it makes you vulnerable to accept escalations of abuse AND attribute them to your OWN failure and not the ill will of the abuser.

About a dozen women wrote me privately and anonymously to share their experiences, and they had so much insight and wisdom and humor that I hope I do them justice and crystallize their experiences here. Because I think it’s tempting for us survivors to focus on the abuser, which can be detrimental for our recovery, I also asked them to recollect how they put the pieces back together after leaving the relationship. What follows below are bits and pieces of these anonymous conversations, both about gaslighting and abusive relationships in general. While I originally intended to focus on gaslighting alone, there were too many invaluable insights to pare them down.

This is a giant beast of a discussion on emotional and physical abuse and its affects on our mental health, and as such this is your neon, flashing trigger warning.

Read More…Read More…

Fat acceptance, circa 1957

Hell yeah, she can look just as pretty as her less generously proportioned friends.

1957 ad for Chubbette clothing with the headline, "Your chubby lass can be the belle of her class"
Chubbette - clothes for the chunky lass in your life

She can also be as happy as a hit with a rollicking beat, and she can have a tummy and still look yummy. And those dresses are really cute. But, um, Chubbette? What, was “Fatshionista” already taken?

And yes, they are “fashions to make girls 6 to 16 look slimmer,” rather than “fashions to make girls feel cute,” but it could be worse. She could be Tracy Harper, bless her flower-clutching heart.

M0nk3y cr0tch

Embarrassing story (though not for me): When my brother* was about seven years old, he and his best friend would run around the house yelling out bad words and feeling terribly naughty about it. The problem was, being seven, they didn’t actually know any really bad words, and “pantyhose” was the absolute naughtiest one they knew, so they ran around the house yelling “pantyhose.”

Thank God they hadn’t come across “monkey crotch.”

With a creativity and dedication to the task unusual for local officialdom, [Pakistan’s] telecoms regulator has issued a list of more than 1000 words and phrases which will be banned.

After serious deliberation and consultation, officials from the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) have come up with more than 50 phrases using the word “fuck” and 17 involving “butt.”

The bans, the agency says, is intended to control spam, and the texts themselves are not to be monitored or recorded.

A few samplings to pass along to your seven-year-old brothers to provide a little variety:

– athlete’s foot
– breast
– condom
– deposit
– fairy
– fingerfood
– flatulence
– fondle
– harder
– headlights
– herpes
– hostage
– intercourse
– Jesus Christ
– love pistol
– premature
– tampon
– tongue
– quickie
– Wuutang

Everybody now: “Tampon! Tampon! Tampon! Tampon! Tampon!”

*Dude, you’re welcome.

Posted in Uncategorized

Extreme Debate Makeover: Public breastfeeding edition

I have a real distaste for bad debate. It’s such a good and enjoyable pastime, debate, and an opponent who chooses to fall back on tired, flaccid arguments really tarnishes the joy of the sport.

Like the story of Natalie Hegedus, the woman who was dressed down in front of a courtroom for breastfeeding. There’s so much to talk about! Was the bailiff or the judge worse behaved? How much authority does a judge have over the running of his/her courtroom, and does it at any point overtake a woman’s right to breastfeed publicly? And shouldn’t a courtroom built for taxpayers using taxpayer funds be more taxpayer-friendly?

Alas, no. All we get are the same old arguments: Not in public! She should have pumped! She should have gone to the bathroom! Why did she have her kid there in the first place? Boobies are disruptive! Et cetera, ad infinitum. Come on, people! Where’s your spark? Where’s your creativity? Argue it like you mean it!

Feministas, you’re all reasonable and informed-like: What arguments could be made against public breastfeeding that haven’t been made a bazillion times before? Give the good people some new material to work with. Here are the tired, stretched-out, armpit-stained arguments that won’t fly:

1. Breastfeeding is comparable to pooping. One is food at the beginning, the other is food at the end. One has everything the body needs, the other is everything the body has decided it doesn’t need. Changing a diaper != breastfeeding. (Also, public sex != breastfeeding.)

Read More…Read More…

The Sexual Appeal of Non-Gender-Conformity

This is a guest post by Rebecca Katherine Hirsch.
Hello! Have I a disclosure for YOU (and you and you and you): I am attracted to men who do not hew unbendingly to unrealistic–that is to say, “traditional”–templates for male behavior. I am similarly heartened by all gendered people who work to find the courage to map out their own internal and presented identities in the face of omnipotent, implicit and explicit gender stereotypes!

More on Gaslighting

Gaslighting is a particular kind of emotional abuse, whether intentional or not, that over time makes the abused feel that her perception of reality or of herself is false. The gaslighter manipulates the victim’s sense of self in order “to be right [and] preserve his own sense of self.” From wikipedia:

Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse in which false information is presented with the intent of making a victim doubt his or her own memory and perception. It may simply be the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred, or it could be the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term “gaslighting” comes from the play Gas Light and its film adaptations. In those works a character uses a variety of tricks, including turning the gas lamps lower than normal, to convince his spouse that she is crazy.

In the post on gaslighting below, there are several people sharing stories about how they were gaslighted (gaslit?) in romantic and in parent-child relationships in the comments. Although Yassar Ali, the author of the article that Caperton deftly dissects below, doesn’t have his understanding of gaslighting quite right, he is correct that it’s a form of emotional abuse that is often levied against women, and it works precisely because of prejudices about femininity, that women are nervous, hysterical, and less prone to intelligent reasoning. Probably the most common form of gaslighting reported is in a domestic violence situation where the abuser flatly denies that any abuse happened at all — leaving the abused to “prove” that the abuse happened not only to bystanders and authorities, but eventually to herself. Gaslighting also happens frequently in parent-child relationships, in which the parent denies abuse or neglect to continue to appear to be a good parent, and the child eventually accepts that their own perceptions of reality and memory are suspect because of the parents’ systematic denial of abuse. Another form of gaslighting is when a person tries to make you believe you are something (usually negative) that you are not, clumsy, slutty, dumb. A gaslighter, in other words, is trying to rewire the narrative to preserve a positive self-image, even at the expense of the people around him.

In the interest of information-sharing and catharsis, I want to solicit your gaslighting experience stories and I will arrange and publish them here. If you’d like to share them in your own space, please feel free to send me a link. Please let me know whether you wish to remain anonymous, and email me before the end of the day on Friday, 11/18/11. Send emails to fauxrealtho at gmail with the title “Gaslight” or leave them in the comments. Forgive my pronoun usage, as I am using heteronormative language to describe this dynamic, but it happens to everyone. My thought is that by sharing en masse we can represent this experience as women better than Ali was able.

____________
This is a guest post by Lauren Bruce, founder of and former resident blogger at Feministe, who has, shall we say, an intense personal interest in this subject.