How I knew this post was going to be terrible:
1. It’s by Scott Adams.
2. It’s called “pegs and holes.”
3. You can probably guess who’s the peg and who’s the hole.
4. There’s a strained metaphor about zebras and lions and watering holes.
5. You can guess who’s the zebra and who’s the lion.
6. Hugh Hefner plays the Everyman.
So:
If you have a round peg that doesn’t fit in a square hole, do you blame the peg or the hole? You probably blame neither. We don’t assign blame to inanimate objects. But you might have some questions about the person who provided you with these mismatched items and set you up to fail.
If a lion and a zebra show up at the same watering hole, and the lion kills the zebra, whose fault is that? Maybe you say the lion is at fault for doing the killing. Maybe you say the zebra should have chosen a safer watering hole. But in the end, you probably conclude that both animals acted according to their natures, so no one is to blame. However, if this is your local zoo, you might have some questions about who put the lions with the zebras in the same habitat.
Now consider human males. No doubt you have noticed an alarming trend in the news. Powerful men have been behaving badly, e.g. tweeting, raping, cheating, and being offensive to just about everyone in the entire world. The current view of such things is that the men are to blame for their own bad behavior. That seems right. Obviously we shouldn’t blame the victims. I think we all agree on that point. Blame and shame are society’s tools for keeping things under control.
The part that interests me is that society is organized in such a way that the natural instincts of men are shameful and criminal while the natural instincts of women are mostly legal and acceptable. In other words, men are born as round pegs in a society full of square holes. Whose fault is that? Do you blame the baby who didn’t ask to be born male? Or do you blame the society that brought him into the world, all round-pegged and turgid, and said, “Here’s your square hole”?
The way society is organized at the moment, we have no choice but to blame men for bad behavior. If we allowed men to act like unrestrained horny animals, all hell would break loose. All I’m saying is that society has evolved to keep males in a state of continuous unfulfilled urges, more commonly known as unhappiness. No one planned it that way. Things just drifted in that direction.
The “natural instincts” of men are to rape women and tweet photos of their dicks? That’s some jungle.
The rest of the post is just as bad, and is mostly a disturbing look into Scott Adams’ mind — he would apparently be raping up a storm if bitches ladies weren’t making him a slave to their laws and their rules and their morals. And he seems to be under the impression that men who sexually assault women are just finally giving in to the kinds of natural urges that all men have to force sex on unwilling females. Because all men, in Scott Adams’ head, are misogynist brutes who don’t see women as people and who basically view the female body as a semen recepticle over which they should have full rights. Scott Adams’ perception of men? REALLY BAD. The worst. Scott Adams kind of makes it sound like men should just be exiled to a private island where they can brutalize each other and text as many dick pictures as they want without harming women (women, of course, are gentle and moral creatures). Which makes Scott Adams a super-radical man-hating feminist, maybe? Welcome to the dark side, pal.