In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

And the best hat goes to…

Beatrice! It’s like fallopian tubes meet Mickey Mouse ears:

beatrice

I’m trying to track down a photo of her crying during the ceremony, which was my favorite moment of the whole wedding, but no luck yet.

Step 1: Buy pearls. Step 2: Clutch.

Women are going to college and then not marrying plumbers. Holy crap, who are they going to marry then?!

In a few weeks, the first of the 2011 college grads will toss their mortarboards in the air and bid adieu to campus life. A healthy majority of those hat-tossers — 57%, actually — will be women.

So here’s a question: when the time comes, will these women be willing to marry “down”? Don’t bet on it.

Bitches.

It’s easy to figure out why educated men and women have finally found each other. For one thing, educated women now bring considerable income to the joint bank account. For another, Americans have grown to expect more equality and companionship in marriage than they did in the benighted past. It makes sense to assume that the University of Michigan grad will share interests and a mindset with someone he met in econ class rather than a clerk he locked eyes with at the DMV. This may be why, as several studies have found, husbands and wives with different education levels are more likely than homogamous couples to head to divorce court.

You mean people who have similar backgrounds and interests are typically drawn to each other, and have more stable relationships than people who marry someone they just thought was kind of hot? Weird.

Still, the biggest reason we probably won’t see a lot more college-educated women walking down the aisle with their plumber is one we don’t like to say out loud: they want to have smart kids. Educated men and women are drawn to spouses they think will help them produce the children likely to thrive in the contemporary knowledge-based economy. That means high IQ, ambitious, and organized kids who will do their homework and take a lot of AP courses. The preference for alpha kids is the reason there is a luxury market for Ivy League egg and sperm donors. It also explains why, though we don’t have solid research distinguishing between elite and State U mating choices, Ms. Harvard will probably not accept a proposal from Mr. Florida State.

The biggest reason? Really, the biggest?

In this respect, homogamy, at least educational homogamy, has a profound social downside; it increases economic inequality. Educated couples pass on the smarts and habits to their children that lead to good jobs and nice homes with lots of enriching activities for the grandkids, while the children and grandkids of less-educated men and women remain behind.

Americans don’t like to think of themselves as class conscious. But marriage brings out the snob in the most democratic man or woman — for better or worse.

You know those poor and uneducated people, with their bad habits and stupid children. Educated women should do everyone a favor and marry less-educated men because otherwise, Social Downsides. Also, everything women do comes down to Babies (and in particular, the making of).

I’m pretty educated, but I don’t think I’ve ever dated a dude and thought to myself, “I would totally marry this guy for his Harvard sperm.”

But that’s because I don’t look good in crimson. Yale sperm, that’s a different story.

Are yoga pants appropriate for work?

lulu lemon yoga pants
It is a true fact that Lulu Lemon yoga pants make your butt look really good, which may or may not be appropriate for work, depending on your job.

So should you wear yoga pants to work? It depends; do you work at a yoga studio? Then that’s ok. Or are you a busy mom who sacrifices dignity for comfort? That is not ok.

Elastic may well be a feminist issue; the problem, said Stacy London, a host of “What Not to Wear” on TLC and a style correspondent for the “Today Show” on NBC, is that women, especially busy mothers, are sacrificing dignity for comfort. “A pair of jeans with a zipper and a button takes a nanosecond longer, and it says, ‘Hey. I’m important, too. It’s not just about my kids,’ ” Ms. London said. “You’re telling your kids you matter, and you’re setting yourself up as a role mode for them — that you always need to have a certain amount of self-respect and put a certain amount of care into your appearance.”

I do not wear yoga pants to work. This is because I am a role model for the children I do not have, and something something self-respect girlpower mompower.

Also since when are jeans appropriate for more formal (or business-casual) workplaces? Is “it’s ok if it has a zipper and a button” the new rule for office attire?

Thanks for the link-bait, Neil.

Regarding the Obama Birth Certificate

Obviously it is a fake. Obama says he was born in Hawaii. But we’ve all seen the show LOST, which was filmed in Hawaii, and no one survives childbirth on the island. So it’s IMPOSSIBLE that Obama was born in Hawaii, and this document is an obvious forgery. How stupid does he think we are? OBAMA LIES, DON’T BE SHEEP, VOTE TRUMP IN 2012.

(Just trying to help these guys out).

“The time has come,” the Walrus said, “To talk of many things…”

I’ve had a hilariously ridiculous time with Internet connectivity over the last six weeks or so. I’m waiting on my third Internet company to connect me up (in my brand new house, I just moved!) in a couple of days. That’s why I haven’t been around very much. And I hadn’t been planning to do this for a few more days, but, well, I guess the universe is telling me something what with this luckless Internet run. My plan, I’m sorry to say, readers, is to leave Feministe.

Read More…Read More…

Awaiting the Royal Wedding

kate middleton
My interest in the royal wedding doesn’t extend far beyond the Times style section dress speculations, Kate Middleton For The Win and wondering how in the world Our Future Princess gets her hair that shiny (seriously how? The people have a right to know). I didn’t even realize the wedding was happening so soon — didn’t he just propose and don’t these things take time to plan, even with a staff of servants? But, as I have a well-documented love of weddings, wedding dresses and wedding television shows (if not marriage for myself), I’ve been suckered into getting up at 4 a.m. on Friday to watch the whole thing go down. I don’t often get suckered into things (especially ridiculous pop-culture events that involve E! News countdowns and getting up at ungodly hours) so I have, in turn, suckered a third easily-manipulated individual into joining the group, and now it’s a party.

Ugh. At least it will involve coffee and lots of scones and even more champagne. Anyone else dotty enough to watch it live (even if it’s on at a reasonable hour where you live)? And OMG WHAT IS SHE GOING TO WEAR YOU GUYS?!

Sick of small plates? Heavens no!

small plates

Jason Kessler’s bio sounds a lot like mine: He “loves to complain almost as much as he loves to eat.”

But now I will complain about him. Because he is indisputably, unequivocally wrong.

Why do I hate small plates? Because they’re completely contrary to how I like to eat. If I order something I love, I want a lot of it and I don’t want to share. With small plates, you’re encouraged to have a few bites of everything and share with the table. I don’t have a problem with sharing. I do have a problem with sharing something that I didn’t get enough of in the first place. Tell me you haven’t been in a situation where one miniscule portion of baby back ribs–let’s say, four ribs–was served to a table of six. Everyone is forced to cut a tiny slice of a rib to be polite. It’s ridiculous, not to mention unsatisfying.

INCORRECT. Small plates are glorious precisely because you get to sample so many different things. A big plate of something delicious is delicious, but six little plates of six different delicious things? Even more delicious! And sharing is the most fun part of eating, you scrooge.

We need better birth control

Yes yes yes to all of this (from a lady who no longer uses birth control for many of the reasons cited in the article).

The statistics on women’s satisfaction with birth control should be enough to make Big Pharma invest in some serious R&D: Virtually every woman in America (99 percent of us) will use some form of contraception in our lifetime. In the United States alone there are 62 million women of childbearing age, 70 percent of whom are sexually active but do not want children. In other words, at least 43 million American women need birth control—and that’s not even counting the men who sleep with them.

We also need better birth control. A 2004 survey found that 20 percent of women were not satisfied with the contraceptive method they were using. On average, women try four different types of contraception during their lifetime. Studies continue to show that even low-dose hormonal contraception exacerbates depression and decreases libido. And last year, a study in the Journal of Family Practice found that only 57 percent of women on the Pill were happy with it.

Fifty years after the invention of the birth-control pill, we are all so busy celebrating our contraceptive options—and defending our access to them—that we tend to forget how few we have. The basic science behind most contraception remains virtually unchanged since the 1950s, when researcher John Rock discovered that a combination of estrogen and progesterone would allow a woman to control her fertility. Sure, scientists have tweaked the hormone levels and delivery methods, but every single one of these innovations is still based on synthetic hormones.

The fact that nearly all birth control is based in the same science will come as no surprise to any woman who has tried to find a non-hormonal contraceptive choice. Her celebrated options are very quickly reduced to using condoms, charting her cycle and abstaining when she’s ovulating, or abstaining altogether. When young women I know have inquired about getting an IUD, a shocking number have been dissuaded by their doctors. (Here’s more on that.) And despite frequent assurances that a male contraceptive pill is “on the horizon” or “in development,” it’s nowhere close. “The joke in the field is: The male pill’s been five to 10 years away for the last 30 years,” Dr. John Amory, a researcher at the University of Washington, told CNN.

Also that: Maybe it’s time for dudes to take some responsibility for the avoiding-pregnancy thing.