In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Department of Housing and Urban Development Announces Protections for LGBT Community

Earlier this week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced plans to ensure that people eligible for their programs will not be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. From the press release:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced a series of proposals to ensure that HUD’s core housing programs are open to all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

“The evidence is clear that some are denied the opportunity to make housing choices in our nation based on who they are and that must end,” said Donovan. “President Obama and I are determined that a qualified individual and family will not be denied housing choice based on sexual orientation or gender identity.”

The initiatives announced today will be a proposed rule that will provide the opportunity for public comment. The proposed rule will:

  • clarify that the term “family” as used to describe eligible beneficiaries of our public housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs include otherwise eligible lesbian, gay, bi-sexual or transgender (LGBT) individuals and couples. HUD’s public housing and voucher programs help more than three million families to rent an affordable home. The Department’s intent to propose new regulations will clarify family status to ensure its subsidized housing programs are available to all families, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
  • require grantees and those who participate in the Department’s programs to comply with local and state non-discrimination laws that cover sexual orientation or gender identity; and
  • specify that any FHA-insured mortgage loan must be based on the credit-worthiness of a borrower and not on unrelated factors or characteristics such as sexual orientation or gender identity.

In addition to issuance of proposed rule, HUD will commission the first-ever national study of discrimination against members of the LGBT community in the rental and sale of housing.

The regulatory process is to begin immediately, with the study following soon after.

Read More…Read More…

Alternative Business School Rankings

This is awesome: The Aspen Institute has released a survey of MBA programs, going beyond test scores and ranking them according to “how well schools are preparing their students for the environmental, social and ethical complexities of modern-day business.” [Full disclosure: A friend of mine worked on the report].

The rankings reward programs which are not only academically rigorous, but which impart upon their students values, ethics and a sense of social responsibility. Some of the findings:

• The percentage of schools surveyed that require students to take a course dedicated to business and society issues has increased dramatically over time, but at a slowing rate: 34% in 2001; 45% in 2003; 54% in 2005; 63% in 2007; 69% in 2009.
• Since 2007, the number of elective courses offered per school that contain some degree of social, environmental or ethical content has increased by 12%, from approximately 16.6 to 18.6 electives.
• The proportion of schools offering general social, environmental or ethical content in required core courses has increased in many business disciplines–Accounting, Economics, Finance, Management, Marketing, Operations Management–since the last survey in 2007.
• However, the percentage of schools requiring content in a core course on how mainstream business can act as an engine for social or environmental change remains low, at 30%.
• Approximately 7% of faculty at the surveyed business schools published scholarly articles in peer-reviewed, business journals that address social, environmental or ethical issues. The titles and abstracts of the 1,211 articles are available at www.BeyondGreyPinstripes.org.

It’s a pretty cool report, and definitely worth checking out.

Woman Arrested For Assault While Having a Seizure

Ambulance on an empty road, with lights on. Among the text on the vehicle are the words 'AMBULANCE,' 'PARAMEDIC,' and 'DIAL 911.'

Via the daily link roundup at FWD/Forward comes this really horrifying story out of Chicago about a woman who was arrested for assaulting paramedics. The accused woman was having a seizure at the time.

Kourtney Wilson, 23, was charged with assaulting three paramedics. But Kourtney says that’s impossible because she was in the midst of a seizure. And she says, what she deserved was treatment, not a trip to jail.

“I’ve had many seizures and been in the hands of many paramedics, and I’ve never had such an awful experience,” Kourtney said.

Kourtney has a history of lupus, and around 12:30 Monday afternoon, she had a seizure at her Woodlawn home.

“She just started shaking, violently shaking and her teeth were clattering,” said Tiffini Williams, Wilson’s roommate.

That’s when Tiffini called 911and paramedics responded.

“I just remember being strapped down, feeling like I was in a straitjacket, and I just kept taking off the strap, like ‘please no, please no’, not really understanding everything that was going on,” Kourtney said.

But Tiffini repeatedly confronted the paramedics about what she saw as heavy-handed tactics, telling them, “‘I called you all to help her but you’re being too rough with her. It’s almost like you’re assaulting her.’ As soon as I said that, one of the EMT guys pointed to Kourtney and says, ‘you’re going to jail.'”

Kourtney says she was dragged down the stairs of her house in handcuffs to a waiting police car.

Read More…Read More…

I Am Not a Pre-Existing Condition

untitled

Being a woman is not a pre-existing condition — but that’s exactly how it’s treated by health insurance companies. The following facts are from SEIU, via RH Reality Check:

  • Only 14 states require insurance companies to cover maternity care
  • Only 12% of individual insurance plans include comprehensive maternity coverage
  • Insurance companies can consider prior cesarean sections as a “pre-existing condition” and deny a woman coverage for childbirth. Additionally, in Florida for example, women who have had c-sections are charged 25% more in premiums if they want to retain their health insurance coverage of birth.
  • In Illinois, according to a Chicago Sun-Times article on 6/26/07, a woman’s emergency c-section (much to her physician’s consternation) was denied coverage by BlueCross BlueShield.
  • For that matter, pregnancy itself is often considered a “pre-existing condition” by insurance company, therefore a reason to deny coverage. According to a 2008 study conducted by the National Women’s Law Center, “The vast majority of individuals market health policies that NWLC found do not cover maternity care at all. Even if a woman is not currently pregnant, it is unlikely that an insurer will provide or even offer maternity benefits as part of her regular insurance policy.”
  • Victim of domestic violence? As the SEIU flyer says, in eight states and Washington DC it is legal for insurance companies to deny health coverage to victims of domestic violence. In fact, when the vote to ensure coverage for individuals in this situation came to the floor of the Senate in 2006 (through a proposed bill by Washington state Senator Patty Murray), ten Republicans voted against it, killing the bill.
  • In 2007, Senate Republicans voted to override regulations requiring insurance companies to cover mammograms in more than 20 states. The year prior, ten Republicans voted against requiring insurance companies to cover mammograms.

Join the campaign, and find out more about why centering women in health care reform is crucial.

EDIT: Read Amandaw and Cara.

Donate to WAM!

WAM, a fantastic women’s media organization, is competing in America’s Giving Challenge. I just donated, because WAM has helped me in inumerable ways. I hope you’ll donate too.

I’ve attended the Women, Action and Media conference for the past few years, and have purposely never been a presenter or speaker — I go to hear what other amazing feminist and media activists are doing, saying and promoting. I met Feministe co-bloggers Cara, Jack and Holly in person at WAM. I met Sarah Haskins at WAM. I made connections with some of my favorite writers, thinkers and activists at WAM, including a slew of other feminist bloggers, many of whom have guest-blogged in this space. As part of the WAM listserve, I’ve had engaging and challenging feminist discussions, and I’ve met and spoken with some incredible women. I’ve learned and I’ve grown as a feminist, as a thinker and as a writer.

I gave what I could, and I hope you do too. If WAM! gets the largest number of donations before 3pm EST today, it will win an additional $1,000. It’s currently being beaten out by other groups, including “Make Abortion Unthinkable.”

So if you have some money to give, please donate and fight for gender justice in media.

Audacity indeed.

gabbysidibe091005_1_250

I very much want to see Precious. I have heard nothing but good things. Push is an incredible book and it sounds like the film does it justice. And I absolutely love Gabby Sidibe, who plays the lead role.

What I don’t love is the media narrative about the film and about Sidibe. Luckily, she seems like she can handle it, and has been critical of attempts to cast her as the ugly duckling turned swan: “They try to paint the picture that I was this downtrodden, ugly girl who was unpopular in school and in life, and then I got this role and now I’m awesome,” says the actress. “But the truth is that I’ve been awesome, and then I got this role.”

Gabby Sidibe is also fat, and that’s something that the media, and even the director of Precious, can’t seem to get over. From the NYMag article:

[Precious director Lee] Daniels, who saw hundreds of audition tapes from across the country (350-pound actresses don’t grow on trees), was blown away by Sidibe. “She is unequivocally comfortable in her body, in a very bizarre way. Either she’s in a state of denial or she’s so elevated that she’s on another level,” he says. “I had no doubt in my mind that she had four or five boyfriends, easily.”

Ah, yes, her weight. When Sidibe was 11 years old, an aunt offered to pay for a cruise if she lost 50 pounds. Friends and family continue to pressure her about it. “I still hear it from people who don’t know that they’re pretty close to hurting my feelings,” she says, “people who care about me, like this one friend. I was eating a light potato chip, and she eyeballed me like I was the most disgusting thing she’d ever seen. She says, ‘Every time you want to put something disgusting in your mouth, think of the designers who won’t make a dress for you because you’re fat.’ ”

But at some point, says Sidibe, “I learned to love myself, because I sleep with myself every night and I wake up with myself every morning, and if I don’t like myself, there’s no reason to even live the life. I love the way I look. I’m fine with it. And if my body changes, I’ll be fine with that.

God bless this girl.

But perhaps the biggest offender I’ve seen so far is the New York Times Magazine. The Magazine article isn’t just incredulous at Gabby’s fatness, but also totally weirded out by the fact that this movie was made mostly by black people. Some of them are even fat black people, like Mo’nique, whose every bite seemed to be chronicled in the story. And some of them are even gay black people, like Lee Daniels, whose gayness is proven via a comment about Vivienne Westwood (but about gangsters, so, still black).

It’s sad, but I’m dreading the release of the film, just because I don’t want to read the reviews.

This year, I think I’ll go as a bigot for Halloween

Just double-checking that your Obama costume will involve a mask and not shoe polish

This round-up of ridiculous and offensive Halloween costumes is sort of amazing. And then, of course, there are all of these. Consider this post your “what not to wear” guide.

Luckily, the Awl offers some great DIY costume ideas for those of us who hate having to choose between Slutty Nurse, Slutty Cop and Slutty Cat every year. (Not that there’s anything wrong with wearing a revealing costume, but October is a cold month, and it’s irritating that there are limited options for women).

But like every Halloween, this one has the potential for disaster. Of course there will be That Vagina Guy, but I suspect that the potential offensive costume quotient is heightened for Halloween 09. Unlike last year when the election was looming and Sarah Palin was the big story — and the most common Halloween costume I saw — this year I suspect that we’ll see a lot of Kanye West/Taylor Swift pairs. I also suspect we’ll see a lot of Michael Jackson, Lady Gaga and Beyonce (if you need a leotard, I’d suggest going to American Apparel now, since I’m sure they’re going to sell out). There’s nothing wrong with going as Michael, Kanye or Beyonce in theory, but you know some idiot (or idiots, plural) are going to break out the blackface. If anyone reading this is wondering whether blackface may be a good idea, allow me to answer: No. Absolutely not. Under no circumstances is blackface a good idea. Please pass this message on to a fraternity near you.

PSAs aside, I still don’t know what to be for Halloween. I really want someone to dress up as Slutty Balloon Boy (basket as a skirt, mylar tube top), but I’m not sure it’s going to be me. I’m considering Colonel Qaddafi, just because who wouldn’t want those clothes in their closet? (I’m also considering carrying around the text of a 90-minute rambling speech). I have the boots for Zardoz (really), but not the rest of the, uh, package. And I’m hopelessly devoted to Lady Gaga, but without her thighs of steel I’m not sure I can do her justice in all her pant-less glory.

What are you all going as? Any great costume ideas?

UPDATE: Ann at Feministing has some great ideas.