In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

RIP Tutu Dunham

Obama’s grandmother passed away today. It’s a damn shame she didn’t live to see her grandson be elected president of the United States* — but I have a feeling her confidence in him was strong enough that she didn’t need to be here on election day. I’m also one of those secret liberal God-believers you keep reading about, so I like to think that Barack will have an angel on his shoulder tomorrow.

I’m glad he left the campaign trail to see her one last time. Condolences to her family.

____________
*Don’t worry, I’m knocking on wood.

Posted in Uncategorized

Decision ’08: Watch the Results Roll in on Feministe

The elections are tomorrow, and I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m a little nervous (although extremely optimistic). I’ll be drinking wine with friends as the results come in, and I’ll be blogging a little bit too (as will the other Feministe bloggers), so check Feministe often. You can also follow us on Twitter — Feministe is here, and I’m here.

We’ve also got some cool software from MSNBC that will track the election results as they come in (get it for your own site here), so stay on Feministe as the states turn blue.

And finally, don’t forget to tune in on Nov. 5th for the feminist town forum at 7pm EST.

T minus 1 and counting

I’ve been engaging in some fairly uncharacteristic behavior lately. This morning I headed over to the Brooklyn Academy of Music and spent a couple of hours phone banking for Obama, letting people in Florida know where their polling places are and encouraging them to vote tomorrow. Along with calls I made from home to voters in Pennsylvania using the Neighbor to Neighbor feature on Obama website, this marks the first time that I’ve ever volunteered for a major party candidate. Another first – I’ve donated to the Obama campaign not once, not twice, but four times, which is four times more than I’ve ever donated to a Democrat.

Yes, those were relatively small donations, and yes, two hours of phone banking is not a tremendous amount of time. But that’s a whole lot more time, money, and energy than I’ve ever before invested to get a major party candidate elected. I usually don’t get very excited over the sort of Democrats who are actually viable candidates. I usually vote for Dems because they’re better than the alternative, and often vote for third party candidates (mostly Greens) when they manage to get on the ballot. Even in this election, I’ve lamented the dearth of attention paid to Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente, the Green Party presidential ticket, and for a while was leaning towards voting for them.

I know that Obama isn’t perfect, and that the fact that he is as close to the presidency as he is right now is itself a testament to the fact that he does not represent nearly as much of a departure from the status quo as I’d like to see. I’ve vacillated between feeling excited, hopeful, and proud when I voted for Obama during the February primaries to feeling pretty much over him by April.

But lately, my political pendulum has been swinging back in Obama’s direction. The final weeks of the campaigns have thrown the crucial differences between Obama and McCain into sharper relief than ever. And I’m not even talking policies here, where there are substantial differences but occasionally unfortunate similarities. I’m talking the philosophies of the campaigns and their approaches to politics, which have proven vastly different.

Read More…Read More…

The Feministe Voter Guide

Elections are coming up soon, and there’s a lot at stake — not just for the presidency, but for offices and local initiatives across the country. Eleven states are electing governors. 5,800 legislative seats in 44 states are up for grabs. More than 100 ballot measures will be put to voters. So we’ve created this handy voter guide illustrating the various people and issues up for a vote on Tuesday. We don’t have the time to cover every local race and every issue, so we’ve narrowed it down to races and issues that are of particular importance to feminist voters. I guarantee, though, that we’ve missed a bunch, so feel free to leave local endorsements or thoughts in the comments. If you’re in New York, Planned Parenthood has a great voter guide. And EMILY’s List is a good resource if you want to support pro-choice female candidates.

NATIONAL

The two big-party candidates for president are Barack Obama and John McCain. If you read just one endorsement, make it the New Yorker’s — theirs is the most comprehensive and eloquently-penned, and hits on virtually every crucial issue in this race. I’m not quite the writer that the editors of the New Yorker are, and there have been a lot of accusations that Obama is more about form than substance, but I think even a brief look at the issues makes clear that he is a solidly progressive, feminist choice for the presidency.

A group of economists evaluated both candidates on the positions that have the greatest impact on women, since American women tend to be economically disadvantaged compared to their male counterparts (and since American women are being hit particulary hard by the economic crisis). It’s worth a perusal. Obama earned a B average, while McCain got a D. From the report: “Professor Nancy Folbre, from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, noted that Joe Six Pack and Joe the Plumber are getting lots of attention in this campaign. “What about Josephine the Working Mother, Wanda the Waitress, and Sarah the School Teacher? These working women care about health care, pay equity, retirement security, paid time off, and child care and want to know how the candidates stand on these issues,” Folbre said.”

Obama is pro-choice (NARAL Pro-Choice America gives him a 100% voting record); he supports comprehensive sexual health education; his tax plan is beneficial to the middle class; his response to the economic crisis includes investing in infrastructure and social welfare programs that would actually help “average Americans;” he has supported federal measures that increase paid time off for illness and family leave; he’s been a proponent of wage equality; his running mate, Joe Biden, essentially wrote the Violence Against Women Act, which Obama has steadily supported; he is LGBT-friendly and supports civil unions (although not marriage); he was an early opponent of the war in Iraq and has committed to restoring peace and security to the Iraqi people and bringing American troops home; and he has promised to make his judicial appointments fair-minded as opposed to purely ideological.

McCain has opposed wage equality; his economic plan helps the wealthiest Americans but does almost nothing for middle and low-income people; he is strongly anti-choice; he will likely appoint Supreme Court justices and other judges who oppose reproductive rights; he did not support the Violence Against Women Act the first time around or when it was reauthorized; his health care proposal would create incentives for employers to not offer insurance to their employees, and instead farm the whole operation out to increasingly predatory insurance companies; he has supported the privitization of Social Security; he wants to make the Bush tax cuts permanent and reduce corporate income tax; he does not support any extensions to the Family and Medical Leave Act; despite his supposed “pro-life” values, he has never supported early childhood education or child care expansion initiatives; he voted against expanding the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which would have given more children from low-income families access to health care; he voted for the Defense of Marriage Act; he supports abstinence-only sexual health education; and he supported the Bush administrations efforts to de-fund the UNFPA — a move that has serious life-and-death consequences for women around the world (the $34 million withheld every year could prevent 2 million unintended pregnancies, 800,000 abortions, 4,700 mothers’ deaths, and more than 77,000 infant and child deaths).

But McCain and Obama aren’t the only candidates running. I’m not going to bother with all of the third-party candidates because there are a lot of them and the majority won’t be of much interest to Feministe readers, but I will point out that Cynthia McKinney is running on the Green Party ticket. She is fully pro-choice; she supports LGBT rights, including adoption; she is pro-affirmative action; she is a supporter of VAWA and other measures combatting gender-based violence; she voted no on making the PATRIOT Act permanent; she supports a Constitutional amendment on gender equality; she is anti-death penalty; she supports legalizing marijuana and ending the war on drugs; she wants to emplement the Kyoto agreements and opposes drilling in ANWR; she has a 100% energy independence rating; she supports funding on child care, child heath and child housing; she opposes the war in Iraq; she opposes the occupation of Palestine; she wants to repeal NAFTA and CAFTA; she voted to withdraw from the WTO; she called for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney; she supports publicly financed elections; she supports single-payer universal health care and expansions of pre- and post-natal care; she opposed the Mexican border fence; she authored a living wage bill; and she was a proponent of net neutrality.

For a lot of us, myself included, McKinney best represents our beliefs (I’m not exactly on board with her foreign policy and trade views, but I would guess that I’m in the minority here). Whether to vote for her or Obama is a tough call, especially when we know that she won’t win. So I won’t editorialize too much on that issue, because it’s a touchy one — but I will say that I’m voting for Obama. I’m doing that because, even though I live in a blue state, there are going to be a lot of shenanigans around this election, and Obama needs to win by a large margin in order to make absolutely sure that he’ll be walking into the White House in January. And the larger his victory margin, the clearer it will be that he has a mandate, and the easier it will be for him to move left and push a progressive agenda. I’m also on board with him policy-wise on almost everything, so I don’t feel like I’m settling for a lesser candidate just because he has a better shot. But that’s just my two cents; vote what’s in your heart (unless John McCain is in your heart, and then please don’t). While I think that voting Obama is the best choice for feminists and progressives, I also like to think that people of good faith can disagree on that point. And if you’re in New York, I’ll also throw in a pitch for the Working Families Party; you can vote for the Democrats on their ticket, and it helps to strengthen local progressive politics.

State-by-State:

Read More…Read More…

Nowhere to Turn: How the Individual Health Care Market Fails Women

I’m going to try and assemble a coherent post but I ask for your patience – I was up half the night with a teething, sniffling, coughing baby.

Jill mentioned this the other day and I wanted to go back and point a big flashing arrow at it. The recent economic crisis drew some attention away from the conversation around health care and McCain’s dangerous health care proposal. You’ll recall that under the McCain plan, for the first time ever Americans would be taxed on their employer-paid health care benefits. It would end the tax exemptions employers now get for paying employees’ health care premiums. The result would be millions of Americans losing their employer-paid health care benefits, driving them out of group plans and onto the individual market.

This is all kinds of bad. It’s especially bad for women, and I’m going to let the National Women’s Law Center tell you why. In the past few weeks they’ve done some important work to explain the threat the individual health care market presents to women’s health.

[W]omen attempting to buy health insurance on the individual market often face higher premiums and fewer options for comprehensive and affordable coverage than their male counterparts. And in this economic and political climate, with employees facing layoffs and politicians emphasizing the use of the individual market as a “fix” to our health care crisis, this puts women in grave risk of not receiving the quality health care they need.

The New York Times did a piece on the report last week, and they editorialized on it today. (From this press shop girl: great work, NWLC!)

The biggest take-away is this: women face higher costs for less health coverage in the open market. That’s if we can find insurance at all. Women who get employer-paid health insurance are protected by federal law against gender discrimination. In the individual market, it’s up to states to ensure that women are protected from discriminatory insurance company policies, and most states offer little, is any such protection.

Click here to read the report, Nowhere to Turn: How the Individual Health Insurance Market Fails Women. There’s also an action where you can tell Congress to oppose any health care proposal that threatens to dump women into the individual health insurance market.

Feministe Feedback: Un-Teaching Gendered Language

A reader writes in:

I’m Spanish, and I’m a trainee High School teacher in Spain. Spanish is a language with two grammatical genders: male and female, and when it applies to inanimate objects there isn’t any logic to it. Tables and chairs are female. Glasses and dishes are male. “Person”, “people” and “humankind” are female.

I teach a class of pre-University students (17-18 year-olds) who have to prepare for the pre-university exam. One of the tasks in this exam is a composition, so I have given as homework, and corrected, two compositions already. I have noticed a great tendency to treat English words like “Government” and “people” as male, and also to use “men” as a synonym of people. In general, it doesn’t sound rethorical (“A step for a man……”) but clumsy.

I need to tell them “don’t say man when you mean people” and I don’t know if I should pretend that this is all a question of language, and not at all of politics, in order to get the message accross better. In theory, I should encourage them to reject discrimination and think critically. In reality, I don’t know if I can afford to be known as “the feminist one, who will correct all my homework with a feminist bias / who is crazy / who is weird / who favours the girls / etc etc etc”

Any suggestions about what to do?

Ideas?

Posted in Uncategorized