In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Quick hit: No fucking way

Today’s edition of “When Orange County sees blizzards” is brought to you by

Here’s Robert Waldman:

One politically unfeasible approach to this would be to assign people randomly to HMO’s and pay the HMO’s based on their health but have the HMO’s pay for their health care. Then the HMO decides incentives. You have to decide how much a life is worth (and eyesight and all that) but it doesn’t depend on individual income and the decisions are made by an organization with tons of data.

No way this is going to fly in the real world.

And it damn well shouldn’t.

Am I the only one who sees how profoundly fucked up it is to construct a health market entirely on the end goal of making everyone a picture of perfect health?

Disturbingly similar to Japan’s Metabo program*, this plan would create a world where people with chronic health conditions are punished for having the audacity to lack the ability to wave a magic wand and instantly be free of whatever ails ’em.

My access to health care, in short, would depend on me being something I can never be. No amount of walking, spinach and stir-fries are ever going to take away my pain processing disorder, the tumors in my breasts, the endometrial implants in my pelvic area, or the fucked-up family history and genetic profile that leave me susceptible to severe anxiety and depression.

(Although, incidentally, if you take away all my medication, maybe I’ll finally drop from my current BMI of 25 to the BMI off 16.7 I was at before I started them. You know, the BMI where my doctors were noting in my medical records that I was visibly undernourished and my family members were afraid to hug me because I was so frail? But hey, at least I wouldn’t be overweight!)

Instead, I would be required to jump through so many extra hoops just to get the health care I am already fighting to get on a regular basis.

I do not want to see my doctors, pharmacists, and insurance company docked payment because I fail to live up to the yuppie ideal. I do not want to have to fill out countless health profiles and participate in incentive programs that hinge on me being able to do things I am not able to do.

And if you find a way to exempt people like me from this sort of incentive? You’re pretty much negating the entire point of the whole setup.

So, yeah. Over my dead fucking body. I know it’s not going to happen anyway, but I’d rather not see this sort of attitude fostered in the background. Because it leads to bad, bad places.

*See. I’d disclaim that I’m not calling fat a detrimental health condition, but honestly I think the need for that disclaimer comes out of a fear of the negative attitudes directed toward people with disabilities — and I don’t think that disability/illness/etc. is something we should be shying away from for those reasons.

And consider this a warning that any hatred regarding either fat or disability is going to be smacked down in comments. I have no tolerance for that shit.

Orson Scott Card is a hateful homophobe

Unlike Paul Constant, the author of this piece in the Slog, I have read Ender’s Game (summary judgment on the whole series: interesting in parts, mediocre at best as a whole—all right, Internets, flame me to a crisp). But this is really beside the point: I see no reason why Card’s books should have any bearing on the (de)merits of any particular bit of homophobic sentiment to come spewing out of this odious man’s hatch. (For those not in the know, Orson Scott Card is a sci-fi author, a Mormon, and a really huge homophobe.)

So Orson Scott Card says that gays are simply confused, and that legalized gay marriage, such as now exists in California and Massachusetts, represents “the end of democracy in America.” Never mind, of course, that gay marriage has been legal up here in Canada for years—as well as a whole bunch of other places round the globe—and democracy hasn’t suddenly stopped there. But let’s let the man speak for himself. Here is a link to the original article in the Mormon Times, from which I will quote:

We already know where these decisions lead. We have seen it with the court decisions legalizing abortion. At first, it was only early abortions; within a few years, though, any abortion up to the killing of a viable baby in mid-birth was made legal.

The good old “slippery slope” argument: legalizing gay marriage leads to legalization of polygamy, bestiality, marijuana, hooliganism, murder, and Project Runway. Because in British Columbia, where gay marriage was legal before it became legal in the whole country by fiat, we certainly go out of our way to coddle polygamists.

You know, I can’t even really go any further with this. It’s simply a boring old rehash of the same tired arguments by yet another asshole homophobe. For good filking and commentary, refer to the Slog post noted above. I will, however, pause to note one last thing about Card’s amazingly quixotic defensiveness:

How dangerous is this, politically? Please remember that for the mildest of comments critical of the political agenda of homosexual activists, I have been called a “homophobe” for years.

“The end of democracy in America” is mild???

This is a term that was invented to describe people with a pathological fear of homosexuals — the kind of people who engage in acts of violence against gays. But the term was immediately extended to apply to anyone who opposed the homosexual activist agenda in any way.

A term that has mental-health implications (homophobe) is now routinely applied to anyone who deviates from the politically correct line. How long before opposing gay marriage, or refusing to recognize it, gets you officially classified as “mentally ill”?

Did you notice that really underhanded bit of legerdemain? Card retroactively redefines “homophobe” to have connotations it does not possess under current usage—if, indeed, it ever possessed them at all. Homophobia extends to cover exactly what Card spends paragraphs upon paragraphs on in his screed—it may not be pathological, but it’s fear and hatred all the same. In fandom, what Card has done here is called a retcon, but in this homophobe’s homophobic mind, this isn’t simply sloppy logic; it’s the End Of Life On Earth As We Know It Zomg.

Let me repeat what Paul Constant says: “In conclusion, Orson Scott Card is a hateful homophobe. Please make a note of it, and tell your friends that Orson Scott Card is a hateful homophobe.” Personally, I would further add that he’s a stupid-ass fucker whose books are overrated anyway. Also, a homophobe. And a moron.

Things that make my life easier

I am still accepting suggestions for a catchier title for this series: introduction here and first entry here.

A little background first. If you prefer to skip that, click here to jump directly to the product recommendation…

***

My memories of high school are a blur by now. I can pick out snapshots — crouching in the fetal position outside the music building, the chill of the winter fog seeping deep down into my bones, the sensation of my “feminine sanitary products” reaching a saturation point, and trying not to let my chatting friends hear me moaning for the pain emanating from within me. Collapsing onto the grass out front, waiting for my mother to pick me up to take me to the ER for uncontrollable tremors, after the school nurse refused to even let me rest in her office, much less go home for the day. Dropping off a schedule change request form in the counselor’s office, seeking to reduce the amount of walking between classes… but most of it I honestly don’t remember.

I know that in the spring of my junior year, apparently I went to the doctor for headaches.

Read More…Read More…

So, four feminists walk into a bar…

…exam, the New York State Bar exam to be precise — a lot of aspiring lawyers are taking it tomorrow and Wednesday. And if I’m not mistaken, our very own Jill Filipovic will be among them! Several of my other friends are taking it as well, so this film clip is dedicated to all of you, especially those of you who want to become public defenders. Remember to get some sleep tonight and eat a good breakfast! Good luck, break a leg! Habeas corpus, subpeona duces tecum, tort tort tort!

Posted in Law

Urgent Action for Kobra Najjar

I received an urgent email this morning from Tyla at Equality Now, informing me of Kobra Najjar’s desperate situation:

Equality Now is urgently concerned about Kobra Najjar, an Iranian woman sentenced to death by stoning for adultery who lost her final appeal for amnesty. Iranian women’s rights activists working on her case report that Kobra has exhausted all domestic legal remedies and that her execution by stoning could happen any time.

Kobra is a victim of domestic violence who was forced into prostitution by her abusive husband in order to support his heroine addiction. He was murdered by one of Kobra’s “clients” who sympathized with her plight. Kobra has already served 8 years in prison as an accessory to her husband’s murder. The man who murdered her husband also served 8 years in prison and is now free after paying blood money and undergoing 100 lashes, while Kobra faces imminent stoning to death for adultery – the prostitution her husband forced upon her.

Equality Now is also concerned about recent reports of seven other women and one man, all accused of adultery sentenced to death by stoning, whose executions are also reported to be possible at any time. In Iran, adultery is the only crime punishable by stoning.

[. . .]

Please write to the Iranian officials below, calling for Kobra’s immediate release, the commutation of all sentences of death by stoning and the prohibition by law of all cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments in accordance with Iran’s obligations under the ICCPR. Urge the officials also to initiate a comprehensive review of the Civil and Penal Codes of Iran to remove all provisions that discriminate and perpetuate discrimination against women, including those regarding adultery and fornication, in accordance with Iran’s own constitutional provision for equality before the law.

Equality Now has all of the relevant contact information, some of which I have reproduced below the jump.

Read More…Read More…

Gender testing for female Olympians

Well, that didn’t take very long. China’s state media is reporting that female athletes suspected of “really” being males will be made to undergo gender screening at the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, set to open in a few short weeks:

Suspected athletes will be evaluated from their external appearances by experts and undergo blood tests to examine their sex hormones, genes and chromosomes for sex determination, according to Prof. Tian Qinjie of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

But these tests—which, as the New York Times rightly points out, reduce women to their sex chromosomes as the sole defining characteristic—don’t always work anyway. The Xinhua article says that “test results from about one in 500 to 600 athletes are abnormal”, and goes on to cite a whole set of cases that seem to indicate that these tests may not be all they’re cracked up to be:

Polish runner Ewar Kobukkowska, who won a gold medal in the women’s 4 X 100 meter relay and the bronze in the women’s 100 meter sprint at the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, was the first athlete to be caught in a gender test after she failed the early form of a chromosome test in 1967.

She was found to have a rare genetic condition which gave her no advantage over other athletes, but was nonetheless banned from competing in the Olympics and professional sports.

At the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, eight athletes failed the tests but were all cleared by subsequent examinations.

In another case, Indian middle distance runner Santhi Soundarajan who won the silver medal in the 800 meters track event at the 2006 Asian Games in Doha, Qatar, failed the sex determination test and was stripped of her medal.

Note how Soundarajan is not identified as a male. The article uses feminine pronouns, for goodness’ sake. Her only crime was being intersexed, having one of those genetic abnormalities that can cause the test to yield false results. In fact, it doesn’t appear that there are any cases of this kind of screening revealing men cheating by pretending to be women at this level of competition at all.

And if that wasn’t enough, the New York Times is reporting that a secondary physiological* test may be administered if an athlete fails the primary test:

The concept has drawn criticism over the years, largely because certain chromosomal abnormalities may cause a woman to fail a test, even though it gives her no competitive advantage. Also, if a female athlete fails a test she must have a physiological examination, which many consider invasive and a privacy violation.

(*I initially misread this to mean a psychological exam, not a physiological one. Still gross and icky and stupid, but I am not as flummoxed for lack of understanding as I had been. Thanks to those who pointed it out.)

The New York Times blog post ends with the following question:

What do you think? Is the possibility of male athletes posing as women in the Olympics great enough to warrant such testing? Or are these tests inappropriate?

The answer, as we have just seen, is that male athletes putting on dresses to outclass their female counterparts simply doesn’t happen at this level of sporting competition, and the tests are unreliable, invasive, and essentializing. Shame on the Olympics for even seriously considering something like this.

Unresolved—and more interesting—question: what about trans* athletes? Where can/should/could they compete in a system like this?

Yet Another Guest Blogger Introduction

Good day, Feministe readers! My name is Sam, I blog at the Xyre, and I am absolutely tickled as punch to be guest blogging here for the next two weeks. The guest bloggers so far this summer have been terrific writers with some interesting things to say, and I hope I can live—or at least blog—up to their examples.

Obligatory, extremely condensed information about me: I am a twenty-odd single queer Jewish MTF living in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, where I am a grad student by day and multi-interested nerd by night, or whenever I have time left over. The word in days gone by for someone achieved in a wide variety of subjects was polymath, but for the most part, my achievements are as yet mere aspirations.

My major area of interest is ancient religion and the development of religions, which is essentially my primary topic of research in grad school. I am especially interested in ancient Israelite religion, early Rabbinic Judaism, the birth of Christianity, and the interactions between these latter two and Hellenistic philosophy (especially Stoicism) in the greater Greco-Roman world in the first few centuries of the Common Era. But I also sustain interests in technology and open-source programming, current politics, ancient and modern languages, public transportation systems, and basically anything else. Yeah, I’m easy. If it’s interesting—which pretty much everything is—then I’m interested in it.

I’m planning a number of posts on sexuality and gender in Judaism, from both religious and cultural perspectives, with a special focus on gender identity as an emerging issue that mainstream Judaism has not really dealt with at all yet. But for the most part I’m more or less going to take the next few weeks as they come, and write about whatever strikes my fancy when my fancy is struck. Interesting things have been tending to happen with great abandon in my life recently—I just got back from a long road trip around the United States and Canada—so I’m thinking that this isn’t going to be a problem.

In closing for right now, let me extend my welcome to the other current guest bloggers, as well as my thanks to Jill and the rest of the Feministe crowd for this opportunity!

Their story

This post has been in writing since early April. This seems like as good a time as any to post the finished piece. Consider it a lengthier introduction, a portion of a portrait. And don’t worry, it has a happy ending.

***

Mitsy and Buddy at the window, with Buddy veiled by the sheers

So many important issues to blog about. So little time.

I would like to take the time to introduce you to our two “kids.”

Read More…Read More…

Thanks, And Farewell!

This post ends my guest-blogging stint here at Feministe. Thanks to Jill, Piny, Zuzu, Kactus, Jack, Holly, and Cara for giving me the opportunity to share my writing with a different audience than usual. And thanks to all the readers and commenters who engaged my writing in good faith. For those “fucking whiny-ass titty bab[ies]” (as Lauren so aptly put it) who petulantly refused to engage the content of my posts, and whose comments boiled down to nothing more than ““Where’s your argument; where’s your evidence; you’re not convincing; waah, waah, waah”, please read this brilliant fucking post by Ilyka at Off Our Pedestals.

Finally, just a reminder that those who would like to continue to benefit from PhysioProf’s shiny pearls of wisdom can do so at my eponymous blog PhysioProf and at DrugMonkey on the ScienceBlogs network. I love you all!