In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Does she come with mastectomy scars?

So it’s October, which means it’s National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. And you know what that means: pink-ribboned merchandising opportunities!

Sure, you got your mixers, and your cosmetics, and your vacuum cleaners (because nothing connects you with your womanhood like products designed to remind you that you’re a cooking, cleaning sexbot), but here’s something new: Breast Cancer Barbie!

Mattel Inc. has partnered with the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation to create the Pink Ribbon Barbie doll and the foundation will receive at least $100,000 from the toy company as part of the new partnership.

“The Pink Ribbon Barbie doll celebrates the incredible strength, beauty and resilience of women,” Mattel announced in a statement Monday. “The doll’s beautiful pink gown with attached pink ribbon proudly underscores Barbie doll’s support for the cause.”

The company said the new doll could be used to teach children about breast cancer. The dolls cost about $24.95 in retail stores like Target and Wal-Mart, the company said.

Now, call me cynical, but how is a Barbie doll in a pink gown going to teach kids anything about breast cancer? Sure, kids, getting cancer is all ballgowns and ribbons and prettiness!

Are her famously pneumatic breasts going to come with detectable lumps? Will there be an Oncologist Ken? Will you be able to simulate a mastectomy by spinning her arm, a la Growing Up Skipper, to see one or both breasts disappear and mastectomy scars form? Will her hair fall out from chemo?

Read More…Read More…

I smell a rat

Speaking of banned books, here we have a tale of a lawsuit against a school district in which the plaintiff claims that the vice principal of a Maryland middle school told her to stop reading a particular book or face punishment.

The book? What else?

A vice principal at Dwight D. Eisenhower Middle School in Laurel last month ordered Amber, then 12, to stop reading the Bible or face punishment, according to a lawsuit filed Friday by Amber’s mother. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, alleges that the vice principal’s actions violated the girl’s civil rights.

“Amber’s a new Christian, and she’s trying to learn all she can,” said Maryann Mangum, the girl’s mother. “She reads her Bible and she goes to Sunday school. . . . It really upset me when she was not allowed to read it on her own time.”

John White, a spokesman for the school system, said administrators learned of the lawsuit Friday and were not prepared to comment on its claims. “We’re just beginning to look into it,” he said.

Mangum said her daughter was reading her Bible on Sept. 14 when Vice Principal Jeanetta Rainey approached. According to Mangum and the lawsuit, Rainey told Amber that reading the Bible violated school policy and that she would face discipline if she continued to do so.

Later that day, Amber recounted the episode to Mangum, who is her adoptive mother and also her biological grandmother. James Baker, a family friend, sent a note to the school asking that the principal identify any policy barring students from reading the Bible during their free time.

Yeah, I smell a rat. This has all the hallmarks of one of those “oppressed Christian” lawsuits that turn out to be based on less than nothing. Remember that case in California where a teacher claimed he was disciplined for simply teaching the Declaration of Independence? Not quite.

Something else is going on in this case. Maryland’s not exactly a hotbed of antichristian sentiment. This kid’s a “new Christian,” which makes me think she’s in the zealous-convert stage. Was she really just sitting quietly reading the Bible to herself, or was she proselytizing, reading aloud, annoying other students?

You know what else makes me suspicious about this?

Read More…Read More…

Feminists Speaking for Muslim Women

Ali has a post up today about Iranian divorce, and Western feminist involvement with the issues facing Muslim women in Islamic countries. Ali writes,

To me, it is better if a progressive rather than a Neo-Con gets gung ho about human rights in the Muslim world because the latter will try to solve the problem by occupation and turning half the country into ‘insurgents.’ The problem, of course, and I think Jill knows this full well (because she tries to confront it), is that progressives will not get gung-ho about human rights issues except as an academic exercise (or when they can get their universities involves). (They are often too afraid to come off as cultural imperialists — which is due to having taken a few too many post-colonial studies classes). Once they “learn” about an issue from an ‘insider’ party, they feel as if they have done their part – as if awareness is activism. This is what distinguishes progressive human rights activism from the activism of today’s neo-liberal semi-neo-conservative. The latter is actually action oriented (even if the action is highly dubious and altogether counter-productive, like invasion or economic sanctions).

Now, I see what he’s saying, but I’m not sure that he’s entirely understanding our (or at least my) motivations. I write about issues facing Muslim women, but I make an effort to recognize that I don’t speak for them, and that there are Muslim women who are speaking, writing and acting on behalf of themselves and other women who share their backgrounds.

Read More…Read More…

Belated Banned Books Week

A informational supplement from the Department of Unintentionally Subversive Hilarity:

A Caney Creek High School dad is fired up because the Conroe Independent School District uses the book “Fahrenheit 451” as classroom reading material.
Alton Verm, of Conroe, objects to the language and content in the book. His 15-year-old daughter Diana, a CCHS sophomore, came to him Sept. 21 with her reservations about reading the book because of its language.
“The book had a bunch of very bad language in it,” Diana Verm said. “It shouldn’t be in there because it’s offending people. … If they can’t find a book that uses clean words, they shouldn’t have a book at all.”
Alton Verm filed a “Request for Reconsideration of Instructional Materials” Thursday with the district regarding “Fahrenheit 451,” written by Ray Bradbury and published in 1953. He wants the district to remove the book from the curriculum.
“It’s just all kinds of filth,” said Alton Verm, adding that he had not read “Fahrenheit 451.” “The words don’t need to be brought out in class. I want to get the book taken out of the class.”
He looked through the book and found the following things wrong with the book: discussion of being drunk, smoking cigarettes, violence, “dirty talk,” references to the Bible and using God’s name in vain. He said the book’s material goes against their religions beliefs. The Verms go to Grand Parkway Church in Porter.

Well, of course not. It’s filth.

Read More…Read More…

Friends like These

There’s already been a little talk around the blogosphere about the unsavory interpretations of the Foley scandal (e.g. the Lavender Lolita mafia that lurks in chatrooms waiting for the chance to prey on impressionable Republican congressmen, or the enormous potential for internet censorship). A similar story has been going on in my neck of the woods for some time. It involves a church, but no abused minors, fortunately:

Few were surprised when the Rev. George Regas, the retired rector of the liberal All Saints Episcopal Church here, returned to the pulpit just days before the presidential election in November 2004 and delivered a fiery broadside against the war in Iraq as well as politicians who opposed abortion or anti-poverty programs.

Regas insisted he was not instructing the congregation on how to vote, but he minced no words in identifying the enemy: “conservative politicians with the blessing of the religious right.”

The surprise came in what followed.

First, the Internal Revenue Service began investigating whether All Saints, one of the largest Episcopal churches in the country, violated the prohibition against tax-exempt organizations intervening in election campaigns by supporting or opposing candidates. The church, which characterizes Regas’ sermon as merely a discussion of moral values, found itself in the middle of a potentially expensive legal battle.

Stop him before he excommunicates again!

Oh, wait, sorry–different political pulpit.

Read More…Read More…

Why Zach Braff Really Irritates Me

Yes! Yes, exactly! It’s because it’s not a sensitive-guy romantic comedy! It’s because it’s a Woody-Allen-esque fantasy dressed up as a Nora-Ephron-scripted Meg-Ryan vehicle!

The Last Kiss has been marketed as a feel-good romantic comedy, but many viewers have found it’s actually an anti-date movie: it’s essentially about a guy (Zach Braff) who cheats on his beautiful pregnant fiancée (Jacinda Barrett) with a hot young college student (Rachel Bilson). Quite the catch, ladies!

I think I’ll stick with Happiness* and Your Friends and Neighbors, thanks.

*I actually rented this with someone as a date movie. Not just a date movie, either–one of those, “Let’s get together and ‘rent a movie,'” movies.

Five Things Feminism Has Done For Me

I’ve been tagged! The setup, from Shakespeare’s Sister:

I was tagged by Polly at Marginal Notes to share Five Things Feminism Has Done for Me, with the hope that feminist bloggers in America can run with it as they have in Canada in response to the Canadian federal government’s funding cuts to Status of Women Canada. (Seriously, that’s quite a round-up! Well done, Canadian Progressives!) Here goes…

Here are mine:

1. My career options growing up were not limited to teacher, nurse, cook, secretary, maid, whore or nun. Granted, my great-aunt became a lawyer in the 1920s, but Aunt Peggy was still expected to give up her career when she married and had children. My mother attended a women’s college in the late 50s that offered two majors: teaching and nursing. By the time I was growing up in the 70s, there were no limits placed on what I could do, other than my own inclinations.

2. Having chosen a career, I could be assured of actually being considered for jobs in my field. That wasn’t always so. I don’t know that much about Aunt Peggy’s career (she was much older than my grandfather and they weren’t close), but I suspect she had to hang out her own shingle or work for the government if she wanted to practice law. A former boss of mine, who graduated from Harvard Law School in the early 60s with honors, could not find work as an attorney. She eventually found work as a calendar clerk, and only got to practice law when she began a romance with the son of one of the partners, who she eventually married (and I got to work for them both). Sandra Day O’Connor, who graduated from law school a decade earlier than my former boss, could not find a job as an attorney anywhere in California, despite having graduated near the top of her class at Stanford Law, where she served on the law review. She did get offered a job as a legal secretary. It’s inconceivable today that a female graduate with their credentials would not be snapped up by the biggest and most influential law firms.

3. I own stuff, and it’s mine to do with as I will. Even if I marry (though I’m not exactly beating them off with a stick at the moment), my apartment will be mine if I don’t change the title, my furniture is mine, my money is mine, my credit is mine, my debts are mine, my investments are mine, my paltry little jewelry collection is mine. Well, mine and the bank’s, where applicable. But that’s another point — I can sign a contract regardless of my marital status and it will be valid. Time was, married women’s property became that of their husbands, and they could lose everything in a divorce. Similarly, they lost their legal status as adults, because their husbands were considered the head of the family and therefore acted on behalf of the family, who all were accorded the status of children. This was what was used to deny women the vote for so long — since men were voting on behalf of their wives, there was no reason to give women the vote.

4. I’m not forced to choose between staying childless and having sex. In an earlier generation, such as that of my aunts, remaining childless would have meant either entering the convent or remaining in my parents’ home (or, like my grandmother’s sisters, with other family, in their case with each other). Because I grew up when I did, after feminists had driven the birth-control revolution, I have options for preventing pregnancy that just didn’t exist in my mother’s and grandmothers’ day. One of those options was tubal ligation, which I took advantage of 30 years after my mother was refused a tubal on the grounds that if she didn’t have nine children, she had to have permission from her mother, her husband and her priest (guess who was the problem there?).

5. More generally, feminism has allowed me to have dreams and actually feel like I can pursue them. I never doubted for a moment that I could go to law school, become a lawyer, get politically involved, own property, vote the way I wanted to, raise my voice, or make my own mark on the world. Long before I even connected the dots and realized that I owed all of this to feminism, feminism had influenced not only the way that *I* viewed myself, but also the way that others viewed me. So, for instance, despite how misogynist my father was, feminism had worked its magic on him, so that he wasn’t going to stand in my way like his father had stood in the way of his sisters. Feminism changed the culture and made it possible to imagine something different and better than what had come before.

Time to tag five (or more!) people to continue with the meme:

Ilyka
Auguste
Plucky Punk
Scott
Kactus
and, for a bonus, belledame and Tiffany.

Have at! Don’t forget to link back here.