In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

another feminist blogger

I just discovered this blog (yay!), and I am way too intrigued by the idea of open guest blogging not to jump in. How trusting! Maybe some day I’ll try the same.

My blog: I have been blogging since July. My own blog (knit me more time…) started kind of as a knitting blog, but with a general lack of time to knit enough to sustain an entire blog about knitting, and other interesting things to talk about, my blog has become more of an online journal about politics, current events and surviving grad school. When I started blogging I didn’t expect for it to become such a part of my life, but it has, and I have met some great new people in the blogosphere. I have temporarily turned off comments on my blog because of some ridiculous spat in our drama-filled sociology department, but maybe in a while I’ll turn them back on. In the meantime, I love to get email from people reading my blog.

Me: I am a phd student in sociology in Madison, Wisconsin. I try not to let grad school consume my life, although that is a constant battle. I study feminist theory, the media, war, and gender. I have a wonderful partner of 8 years and we have cats (although in a couple years we would like to also have a baby). I am a media junky- fascinated by everything from alternative online media to the propaganda on CNN. I knit, but do nothing else that is crafty. I love watching horror movies with my partner (especially B movies) I kind of design websites (my own in-progress website is here) .

So, I’ll stop hogging this blog right now. I just wanted to give a shout out to everyone here at feministe!

Book Review: The Art of Raising a Puppy

I know that Lauren blogs every Friday about her cat, so I thought I would share what I think is a wonderful book on caring for your puppy. The authors of this book shocked me at first, as they are monks from upstate New York! Their approach to raising a puppy uses a lot of positive reinforcement; however, they also realize that some discipline is needed in order to ensure normal development. This book breaks down each stage of the puppies first two years and walks you through their world from not our only viewpoint as owners, but also through the eyes of the puppies themselves. Each chapter relates back to you a puppy from the litter that you follow throughout the whole book. It makes me feel that they belong to me after completely reading this book. It covers the basics of selecting a breed and breeder as well. If you want to learn more about me and my puppies (I have lots of pictures), you can find me at my blog, Jason A Myers.

Just happy to be me, thanks. Pass the pie.

Quick Intro: Hi, I’m Poppy. I’m a computer technician with a degree in psychology. I’m also a wanna-be freelance writer and photographer in what passes for my free time. Like Alleyrat, I’m cheating – this was originally posted in my cheesy little LiveJournal account a year ago. I regularly post prose and poetry, along with pictures at my ‘home’, Shadowroses, and rants or memes go to LJ.

There’s a jolt that happens, described often as being “snapped back into one’s body”, due to catcalls and street harassment. Walking along, talking to a friend or contemplating your next project, mind freer than a soaring bird, free to contemplate big things. Some oaf yells “Hey, shake that thang!” and it pops like a soap bubble. Suddenly, you’re back in your body, reminded that, think big thoughts though you may, as far as this person is concerned, you’re just a body, conveniently placed on the planet for his aesthetic pleasure. And he’s not the only one. No, not all men are assholes who haven’t grasped the concept that women weren’t placed here solely for their pleasure, but there sure are a lot of them, and they’re always the loudest ones, too. The only way I can explain it in terms that most men might understand is this:

Imagine you’re walking out of a pub after a few beers, arguing with a friend about something that you always debate together, in that friendly way that comes from a lifetime of being expected to have opinions and express them. Maybe you stop for a piss against a wall, and as you’re standing there, a guy somewhere behind you, in a voice that cuts through the buzz and sounds far closer than he really is, says “Nice ass.” You tense. Fight or flight response kicks in. Every fight you’ve ever lost flashes into your head. You’re very aware of how big this stranger could be. But you’re too well trained to show fear. Tucking your now-useless dick back into your pants, you turn around and shout back the first insult you can think of, proving that you won’t take that kind of crap from him. Your friend is nearby, doing exactly the same thing, but you don’t have any attention to spare for him. This is about survival. Congratulations. If you have a good imagination, you’ve just been snapped into your body, just experienced what it feels like to be reminded, suddenly, that you could lose, that you could be hurt. Reminded that no matter what else you can do or how smart you are, your survival comes down to who’s bigger or more intimidating.

To a certain extent, society in the early part of this millennium likes to place the blame on the offendee (I’m avoiding the word victim, which I feel is overused and has lost its original meaning). We have cases of people being pulled over for “driving while black.” During the SARS scare, there were jokes about people “coughing while Asian.” This phenomena of catcalling is just a case of “walking while female.” If you can convincingly put the blame on the female for walking down the street, you can absolve the idiots for hollering at her, because of course it’s not their fault they never learned any manners. Psychology in this case has done us a disservice, teaching us that all we need to do is reconstruct our reactions to a situation, and poof, reality changes. I won’t argue that it works. Since you can’t change how someone else behaves, the best we can do is change how we interpret events. But there is a point where a line needs to be drawn and we need to say “I’m not going to reinterpret this to absolve you from all blame. I’m not going to play that game. I’m not going to excuse you because you’re male and that’s what men do.” Just like there’s times when the line we need to draw is “No, I’m serious, that’s really not cool, and I’m not going to put up with it.” And sometimes it needs to be men who draw that line, because women have been drawing it for years, and we aren’t getting anywhere very quickly.

Not too long ago, I was talking to someone I used to date and, as I expected, he was surprised at the weight I’ve gained since we were together. I was, however, baffled by his easy assumption that my pride would lead me to lose it all and be thin and cute again. And still more baffled when, 2 minutes later, after I pointed out that I’ve stopped taking that kind of pride in my body, preferring to spend it on my mind and intelligence, his response was “it’s about time.” Um, hello? What’s with the “it’s about time”? How the hell am I ever supposed to learn and believe that I am worth something based on what I think instead of what I look like when everyone’s first reaction is to assume that “my pride” will make me decide to lose weight instead of, say, take a class in women’s studies so I can eloquently tell people who think I need to lose weight before I can be wonderful to fuck off. Is it just me, or is there a disconnect here? What’s the message, “You should believe that your brain matters, but the rest of the world will focus on your appearance”? Yeah, that’s healthy. Not.

Since then, I’ve explored being overweight (I refuse to say fat. Fat is bad. Overweight just is.) and how I feel about it. To an extent, it’s a disguise against opinions like the one expressed by my friend above. It’s a disguise against wondering if that freaky guy staring at my legs is gonna follow me home or just hit on me clumsily. It’s a disguise against all of the possible reactions the freaky guy might have when I tell him no, I’m not interested. Once you’re truly overweight (and I am talking here about more than just 1-2 inches and my favorite jeans are a little bit snug. I’m talking about replacing entire wardrobes because nothing fits anymore kind of overweight), you’re less likely to be seen as a potential sex object and more likely to be seen as a competent person. More likely to be given a chance to prove that you can think or do something useful and not just written off as “too attractive to be smart.” It’s camouflage, and it can be useful. When you waltz into a male-heavy office and expect to earn your place among the cluefull, it helps to be able to convince your colleagues that you’re not just there looking for a date. Even at 5’5” and 180 pounds, dressed in the same t-shirt and jeans as everyone else, I still had to push about 6-8 months before I convinced most people that I really was “just one of the guys” who worked there and not a man-hungry homewrecker.

Maybe if I thought it would make me deliriously happy, I might consider losing weight just for that. But I’ve tried dieting, once, I’ve tried replacing a meal with a “meal replacement shake.” And let me tell you, one of those things doesn’t even replace a snack. You’re still hungry afterwards, only you can’t eat anything now, because you just drank a whole meal’s worth of calories, and anything else you eat will make the whole thing pointless. So you suck it up and deal with the grumble in your stomach distracting you from entering data into the spreadsheet you’re working on or calling clients to arrange meetings or keeping the kids from killing each other. And, come lunchtime, you’re still hungry, so you eat twice as much lunch and feel guilty about it. I even tried exercise. I had a gym membership that I never used because it was inconvenient and too far to go. I tried walking around the block, but I got down to the corner and the problems with my ankles that no doctor has been able to find make me limp until I can’t walk any further. And, lets be honest, if the foremost thought in my head is “I’m 40 pounds overweight, so I need to walk up the stairs instead of taking the elevator and I need to eat celery instead of a sandwich,” I’m not thinking about anything else, like “That was an interesting book, but I’m not sure I agree with her point about…” Dieting becomes a way of life if you let pride in your appearance drive it. And that’s unhealthy by itself – constant weight fluctuations are more unhealthy than just carrying extra weight around, and that’s saying a lot.

So, rather than lose myself to self-absorbed navel shrinking, I would rather carry my camouflage around, give myself the leeway to do other things that I want to do. If it protects me from idiots who think that I’m only here for their visual pleasure, so much the better. Besides, I haven’t seen any proof that meeting the beauty ideal truly makes anyone happy. I have a friend who is tall and thin, and has hair light enough to pass for blonde in the summer. Meets all of the requirements, right? Tall, thin, blonde and attractive. She’s been hurt as much as I have in my short dumpy brunette life. Her happiness comes from the same place mine does – reading, keeping creative hobbies, having good friends around to laugh with.

So excuuuse me if I choose not to buy into your beauty myth. I don’t like the rules of this game, so I’m making my own. I choose to be the smart girl that I am, and to be proud of it. I choose to be unconcerned with my appearance and more concerned with my health, both mental and physical. I choose to take pride in what I can do and the way I think and the fact that I actively ponder things like why I’d rather be overweight, and I say “F*%# YOU” to anyone who thinks that I should care about being thin and attractive. You’ve missed the point, and I’m sorry you can’t see it.

2005 Update: The original entry produced a few comments, with people weighing in (no pun intended) on having themselves gained weight intentionally when leaving the “dating game” or different experiences as a woman who had lost a dramatic amount of weight. Going off of anecdotal evidence, weight-as-camoflauge certainly isn’t specific to me. Nor is accepting and living with ones body and all of its flaws.

Oh, and thanks, Lauren, for hosting the Open Mic Guest Day.

How To Survive as a Young Single Parent

This post by Bitch Ph.D. reminded me of a series I have long been thinking of writing:

How To Survive (Comfortably) as a Young Single Parent.

I would like to cover topics on

  • saving money
  • cooking
  • budgeting your time
  • discipline without losing your mind
  • navigating a relationship with the babymama/babydaddy (should he or she still be around)
  • how to advocate for your children
  • negotiating custody
  • the perils of scholastic life as a single parent
  • etc.

There are many things to be said on all these topics and I’m sure there are many more things readers can contribute.

In particular, I am looking for people willing to write on very specific topics such as how to look for scholarships or the legality of issues pertaining to pregnancy/parenthood in the job market and in schooling environments. I’m not looking for abstract analyses, but pragmatic advice and information on how to navigate, circumvent, and even change these problems altogether. One does not need to be young, single, or a parent to add to this project, only have knowledge about these subjects. If you think you have expert knowledge in a related area, please contact.

Please pass this post around. There is a dearth of information on pragmatic solutions to the issues single parents face, especially young single parents, and the more diverse voices we can get on this project the better. If you can think of any other topics you’d like me to discuss, or want to write on a particular topic and be featured on this blog, please indicate so in the comments or send me an email at web [at] feministe [dot] us.

Building a Better Porn

I’m cheating. I’m cross posting from my blog.

Building A Better Porn

{Disclaimer: This post is about sex. If you are offended by sex, or by women speaking graphically about sex, go away now. }

In the April issue of Playgirl Magazine ( I get it for the articles!) there’s an interview with Candida Royale. Royale is the porn star turned porn director who founded Femme Production, a feminist porn company. It’s run “by women, for women”.

Royale explains what inspires her:

“The desire, the need, and the opportunity to break through tired judgmental attitudes and mythology about women’s sexuality and inspire women to think in more self-loving and self-respecting ways…I was inspired by growing to understand how society had twisted my own young, pure sexuality, and in discovering this, I wanted to help women feelbetter about their sexuality and give them perission to explore and experience the gift of pleasure”.

Porn as therapy/self-help/sex education.

My biggest gripe with most straight porn (aside from the generally just crappy aesthetics – enough with the fake boobied blondes already! get some better music! and the lighting – ugh!) is the way women’s pleasure is depicted. I’ve seen things that look downright painful happening to a woman who appears to be writhing in pleasure. Appears to be. Because, you know, she’s acting.

You can say that it’s all fantasy and that everyone knows it’s fantasy, but I’m not sure everyone does know this. This culture is really weird about sex. Most people learn about sex from their friends, from pop culture, and from just doing it. And from porn. And by “learn about sex” I don’t mean the mechanics of reproduction or how to avoid getting an STD or that you’re a slut if you do it before you get married (all things I learned from school, family, and culture). I mean, learning how to give and receive pleasure.

Like Candida Royale says, there are lots of old tired myths out there, and they shape the sexuality of men and women alike. For example, we’ve got a long tradition in this culture of understanding pleasure in male terms. In fact, for many people “sex” is synonymous with intercourse. Many people still think there is something wrong with a woman if she cannot reach orgasm through penetration alone. Clitoral stimulation is still an “extra” for some people.

I know lots of women who didn’t start having regular orgasms during sex until they’d been doing it for five or more years, because they kept thinking it was their fault they couldn’t get off on what got their boyfriends off. They could masturbate to orgasm just fine, but couldn’t get there via sex with men. Eventually they figured it out, learned how to talk to their partners, and, being older, had partners with more experience. But that’s many years of pleasure lost, and I think it’s tragic.

So, back to my biggest beef with porn.

I think most porn contributes to misinformation about sex. Maybe all that fantasy – the women having earth shattering orgasms through being hammered by a huge penis with no clitoral stimulation, the lack of sensuality, the cringe inducing cunnilingus – would be just fine if we had some other way for people to learn about pleasure (besides trial and error). But we don’t, not really. I think a lot of people have to spend the first 5, 10, 20 years of their sex lives unlearning the crap they learned from porn. I know that I’ve wasted a lot of time breaking partners of bad habits they picked up from porn.

I am not making an argument against porn. I am making an argument for better porn. I am making an argument for porn that looks to me like what feels good to me. I want to be able to watch porn that doesn’t leave me struggling to suppress that part of my brain that is screaming No freaken way! That does NOT feel good!. I want to be able to watch porn that is creative, fun, sexy, and well lit, just like the best sex is.

Is that really asking so much?

*******************************

Book Recommendation (which I will blog about later):

She Comes First: The Thinking Man’s Guide to Pleasuring a Woman, by Ian Kerner. Every woman and every person who has sex with women should read this book. Seriously. Read it. I’ll tell you why in a later post. Until then, you can read this review.

Open Blogging on Race and Gangs

My name is Lenka, and I usually blog over at farkleberries. I’ve been a fan of Feministe for quite some time, and although I don’t tend to blog much on feminist issues at my place, it is an issue near and dear to my heart. I hope someday I can articulate my views on the subject as eloquently as the folks at Feministe do! 🙂 It’s a happy coincidence that today is open blogging on Feministe, because I had an unusual experience last night that I’m itching to write about: my Criminal Justice Juvenile Delinquency class had four active Chicago members of the Gangster Disciples, Vicelords and the Black Souls – all currently on parole – visit as guest speakers. Even though our instructor is a retired Chicago cop with over 30 years of street experience under his belt, I have to admit that I was a bit nervous when the guests arrived. Let me put that in context.

We’ve had a streak of violent crimes in my neighborhood this winter, such as the killing of a janitor and a young woman only weeks apart in the apartment building directly across the street from my apartment building. While none of these crimes appears to be gang-releated, I still clearly picture walking home from class that January night, as remote newsvans, camera crews and reporters stood in front of the makeshift memorial at 6151 N. Winthrop where 21-year old Melissa Dorner was raped and murdered, allegedly by a man who lived in her building. The Chicago Tribune had quoted one of Melissa’s relatives, saying she had moved to our part of town, Edgewater, because several stranger rapes had occured recently in her old neighborhood. I try not to dwell on these crimes too much, but when I walk home from the train at around 10:00pm some nights, it’s hard not to see every shadow and approaching stranger on the sidewalk as a bit more malign and threatening. Will I make it home alive tonight, or will my name be on the nightly news? When murder hits this close to home, these normally paranoid thoughts seem almost reasonable.

Back to “gang night at Loyola.” Perhaps these events made me a bit hypersensitive, but it took several minutes to get used to the idea that four people with serious criminal histories (including rape, armed robbery, and murder) were sitting about ten feet away from me. I listened intently, not brave enough to ask the panel any questions of my own, a bit too conscious of my body language and facial expressions. As a thirty-something European-American woman enrolled in a private university, I knew I’d be perceived in my status as a privileged, naive outsider. Nothing that could be done about that, really. Three of the gangmembers were men in their late thirties and forties, and the one woman was by her own admission, “twenty-one going on forty.” All looked much older than their years because of hard living and prolonged substance abuse, and at some point during the evening each one said they felt “blessed” to be alive at this point. None had expected to live past their twenties, and all felt their years in “the life” were wasted time.

21-year old”Sheryl,” coincidentally the same age as Melissa Dorner was when she died, had been involved in prostitution, pimping and heavy drug use since the age of 11. She recalled the time she was discovered in rival gang territory a few blocks away from her home., when some women from a rival gang spotted her distinctive arm tattoo depicting a six-pointed star with Gangster Disciples markings. “Sheryl” tried to save herself by claiming the marking meant that she was Jewish. She was lucky that day. Instead of killing her, the rival gang only sliced the tattooed skin off her arm with razor blades.

The biggest surprise? All had talked about and thanked a woman named Adelle, the gang counselor/liaison who arranged their visit and returned them home that night before their 9:00pm curfew. Adelle is an older African-American woman who normally sits in the back of the classroom, frequently expressing her thoughts in what I sometimes perceived to be a hostile, confrontational and anti-establishment manner. After last night, I really saw her differently. Not only is she a fellow non-traditional student, but a strong woman with incredible street cred, a survivor of a lifetime in some of Chicago’s toughest neighborhoods, who understands, connects with, and helps turn around some of the world’s most difficult and misspent lives. She’s a hero in my book.

(P.S.) Thanks, Lauren, for giving us the chance to guest-blog!

Tangled Bank and Stuff

Tangled BankTangled Bank #24 is up and I am a part of it. Who knew that I could write on science?

This week’s host is Syaffolee, a blog with a rather interesting creature featured as a background image. Do I want to eat it, hug it, or step on it? This is to be seen.

Don’t forget — today is

Open Blog

Another exercise in trust. Don’t forget to plug your blog, and if you don’t have one, leave an email address. If you lurk here and never comment, this is a way to out yourself in style! Don’t be intimidated by WordPress — it is incredibly easy to use.

Prove me right: I can trust the universe (to take up for me when I don’t feel like writing).

Sorry Horowitz, Academics Won’t Shill for the Right

Quick intro: I’m Ryan. I’ve only been blogging for a couple months and, in that time, I have contributed to both Why Are We Back In Iraq? and Watching the Watchers. A few days ago, I started a blog called Imposter Syndrome that will chronicle my experience as graduate student in the Hoosier State. I haven’t found a home for this piece, so I thought it would be perfect for a feministe guest post. I hope you enjoy it.

(Note: This is an expanded, and more satirical, version of a letter that I wrote to the Indiana Daily Student. It was published about a month ago and can be found online here; it’s the second one.)

Welcome to the world of Indiana politics. With the first Republican Governor in 16 years and a few new Republican lawmakers (including at least one Elvis impersonator) the Hoosier State is in for a hell of a lot of interesting, and ultimately useless, legislation as a just matter of state governance. (Think Texas politics with a lot less money on hand to throw around.)

My letter to the IDS deals with HB 1531, a proposed “Academic Bill of Rights”. Now, I don’t have to point out to the astute reader that this is a great title for a bill like this. It’s up there with “No Child Left Behind” and the “Clear Skies Initiative”. Who could be against civil rights for students and professors? Who could oppose this bill?

That’s obvious to David Horowitz and Sarah Dogan, the leading figures behind the Students for Academic Freedom: It’s the pink-o commie behind the lectern, that’s who.

If you’re not familiar with David Horowitz, then consider yourself lucky. He’s the prolific civil rights advocate and editor-in-chief of the conservative outfit frontpagemag.com. I pretty much think he’s a moron, but I’ll let you judge for yourself. Let’s thank Media Matters for America for making things easier on me by sharing this beauty:

Modern liberals are socialists, they’re not liberals. What are they liberal about besides hard drugs and sex? Everything else they want to control in your life. That’s true of the Democratic Party. It’s true of the British Labor Party. They’re socialists. That’s their religion.

Horowitz made this statement for a 2004 documentary titled, “Roots of the Ultra Left”, which was produced by the Leadership Institute. Yep, that’s the same Leadership Institute that “trained” “Jeff Gannon”.

Getting back to the actual bill, its main purpose is to protect students and professors from discrimination based on any political, religious, or ideological leanings. As far as state universities in Indiana go, this whole “controversy” has revolved around the case of Brett Mock’s experience at Ball State. As far as I can tell, he was upset that a Peace Studies course he willingly enrolled in did not discuss perpetual warfare as viable alternative to world peace. An op-ed by Ball State Pres. Jo Ann Gora revealed that “[i]n fact, Mr. Mock has never made a direct complaint to the university – formal or informal – and he waited until months after the course had concluded before first making claims in an article published by Mr. Horowitz’s online magazine.” Gee, I wonder if Mock got paid by Horowitz for that article.

Also, no op-ed would be complete without a rebuttal that doesn’t address the issues raised. More specifically, Dogan and Horowitz do not establish that there isn’t sufficient administrative machinery in place to address the discrimination of students at the hands of professors. This is because they can’t. They’ve tried, believe me. Just visit their site.

To wrap things up, I have just a few questions for those in support of this legislation. Since when are professors supposed to be high priced babysitters? If you’re so concerned with being recruited by the Communist Party against your will, why didn’t you apply to Bob Jones University? (You get a pass on this one if you did, but weren’t accepted.) And finally, do you consider yourself to be Republican, or even Libertarian?

If you answered “yes” to this last question, I think you need to clarify that position with a comment. Wasn’t it your hero Ron Reagan who claimed that “man is not free unless government is limited…. As government expands, liberty contracts”? If you want to bring government control into institutions that have shown an ability to police themselves, go ahead. I don’t think you’ll particularly enjoy the consequences. Also, stop bastardizing the word “conservative”.

Finally, to David, I’d like to express my sentiments, and those of many of my fellow Hoosiers, with what Melvin Udall tells his neighbor in the 1997 film As Good as It Gets: “Sell crazy someplace else, we’re all stocked up here.”

(For some useful information on how to fight HB1531, visit the Indiana Conference of the American Association of University Professors (INAAUP). For now, the bill is dead in the water), but it might be a good idea to make some calls to make sure it stays that way.)

Oh noes! Someone stoled my megahurtz!

I [Ben or Heliologue, depending on how well you know me] talk about a lot of things on my blog, Schrödinger’s Cat is Dead. The question becomes, now that I’m gleefully guestblogging on Lauren’s well-established and overtly sociopolitical blog, what I can talk about that she hasn’t covered and that would be of some use to people who are reading it. Though usually technology issues are a bit too esoteric for such matters, I happen to have what I think is a good topic for even the internet unsavvy.

So, you’ve got a computer, and let’s say for the sake of argument that you’ve got it hooked up (very possibly via a cable or DSL modem) to the big scary internet, a glorious beacon of information, entertainment, and hot Asian teens, but also teeming with viruses, advertisements for Viagra, and people who’d love nothing more than your credit card number.

Most people know that there are ways to protect yourself. Unfortunately, a lot of these things cost serious money, money you’d rather not spend. Making it worse, your damn kids insist on instant messaging everyone in the hemisphere and browsing god-knows-where in search of some of those Asian teens. How can you make your computer safe without breaking the bank? Easy. What follows are five handy programs you can use for free that will help keep your computer safe.

Read More…Read More…

I Don’t See You With An Advanced Degree in Captioneering

Norbizness here from the recently SXSW-poseurized People’s Republic of Austin. This caption-related post is tagged as “Humor,” so these must be funny, right?. The tag wouldn’t lie, would it? (click on the thumbnail for a larger pic)

Man, the reception sucks. Try adjusting the parabolic crown of thorns.

Pills! Who wants pills?

I swear on a stack of Catch-22s, I’ll never club a stuffed seal filled with red dye ever again.

Was it good for you?

I guess that one night in Bangkok does make a hard man humble.

Enough of that. Embarrassing moment time: wearing peach-colored Easter pants to school… in 10th grade. I think I received about 30 comments that day, none of which could be construed as helpful or esteem-building. I still try to squeeze into them from time to time when I want to feel dainty, though.

Posted in Uncategorized