In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Living Waters

As I mentioned in my last post, I spent a long time without getting a period. Occasionally my doctor prescribed me some progestin to initiate withdrawal bleeding (it’s believed that build up of menstrual tissue without occasional bleeding increases risk of endometrial cancer), but by and large, I was period-free. This was pretty scary, though also kind of convenient. I didn’t have to worry about getting caught without menstrual products. I didn’t have to deal with monthly cramps or cravings. I usually become an emotional mess in the week before my period, and that didn’t really happen. So, y’know, that was nice.

A big benefit, at least at first, was that I could have sex anytime.

Mr. Shoshie and I are both religiously observant Jews. For those curious, we belong to a Conservative synagogue, but tend to have stricter practices than most within the Conservative movement. Definitely more than most Jews in the US. We don’t affiliate with an Orthodox synagogue for several reasons, status of women probably being the most important. The Jewish Conservative movement is into egalitarian Judaism, where women have equal status to men, and, most importantly, have equal stake in the mitzvot, the commandments that make up Jewish law.

One of these mitzvot involves menstruation.

The Torah states that men should not sleep with menstruating women. It instructs women to count seven days, then immerse in a ritual bath made from living waters, called a mikvah. This law has been expanded such that most people who still follow it abstain from sex for a week beyond the menstrual cycle, usually for 10-12 days, but sometimes more. It’s also been expanded to encompass all touch, not just sex. So you can see why not menstruating would have been awfully convenient.

I have to say, it sucked.

So, on the one hand, I feel like I, as a good feminist woman, should be totally appalled at this set of laws. There’s clearly nothing wrong with menstruation! It’s a healthy part of having a post-puberty, pre-menopausal uterus. I’m not particularly squicked out by menstrual blood, especially since switching to a menstrual cup about five years ago. Furthermore, I can see the terrible ways in which patriarchy has taken a fairly equal practice (men also had to wait for a time period and immerse in the bath after ejaculation) and twisted it to make menstruating women seem disgusting and abhorrent. I can see the ways that it can and is used to take agency from women about matters that concern the most private parts of their own bodies. And that *is* disgusting.

But, on the other hand, I love the mikvah.

I love everything about it. I love the anticipation of mikvah night. I love that it’s special time for me and Mr. Shoshie. I love that it’s supposed to be a bit of a secret. I love the preparation involved: cutting my nails, scrubbing my skin, washing my hair, flossing, brushing. I love that my focus is supposed to be solely on my body and preparing it for immersion. If something needs to be done around the house, it takes its place behind my preparations. I love chatting with the mikvah ladies, who are friendly and, I think, somewhat bemused by the young woman who shows up with blue hair and wearing pants. But always with a hat or a headscarf. I love the final checks and stepping, naked, into the warm water. I love the totally unrushed, private prayer. Much of Jewish prayer is communal, and I find that when it’s not, it tends to be said in haste. There’s always somewhere to be and the prayer is taking up precious time. But not at the mikvah. I love stepping out and into a towel, carefully walking back to the changing room, and then the pace speeds up, then I’m rushing, throwing my clothes back on, because as soon as I get home, Mr. Shoshie and I can kiss and embrace for the first time in a week.

The sex is pretty much always fantastic.

As much as I can see the problems in maintaining this practice, it saddens me to see it fading. Very few gender egalitarian Jews follow it, and I can totally understand why. But I wonder, how can it be reclaimed? Can it be? Or is a practice that’s had so much time to be manipulated by people invested in patriarchy that it’s completely futile? Am I just acquiescing to patriarchy by maintaining it? Possibly. But I can’t imagine giving it up. It feels too right.

There’s even more that has to be dealt with in order to reduce the oppressive potential of the mikvah. There are women without uteruses. There are men who menstruate. There are women who deal with infertility who suffer such pain with each visit to the mikvah, because it comes to symbolize another failed month. How can these scenarios be dealt with in a respectful and sensitive way? Many mikva’ot are run by very conservative (little c) groups who are not friendly to transgender individuals or women in lesbian relationships or even women who wear pants. I’m pretty lucky, with my community, but I know others who aren’t.

So my question to you all is how we deal with meaningful but loaded practices. Do we throw them out and make new ones? What do we lose when we do that? Can those practices be remolded in our image? Is it worth the effort? In this instance, I think so, though I know there are others who disagree with me. Are there any practices that take on this role in your lives? How do you deal with them?

I don’t think there are easy answers here, but maybe if we keep asking the questions, we’ll start moving in the right direction, whatever that direction may be.

Apres le deluge, le handwringing

Much hullabaloo recently over Chick-Fil-A and its owner’s bigoted statements about same-sex marriage and gay folk. I’m sure you’ve gotten the memo! I’m sure you have your opinion about Jesus Chicken and the boycotts and whatnot.

So I’m going to talk about the handwringing. Oh, noes! Boston Mayor Thomas Menino discouraged Chick-Fil-A from opening a franchise near the Freedom Trail! Philadelphia City Councilman Jim Kenney told Jesus Chicken Boss Dan Cathy to take a hike and take his intolerance with him! New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn asked the president of NYU to boot its campus Jesus Chicken franchise!

Businessy people are troubled, because FREEDOM:

As a gay man, I’m disheartened by statements like Mr. Cathy’s, with their limited conception of what it means to be a family. “Family” is a treasured — I’ll say it, sacred — word in the gay community. Through decades of modern-day oppression, gay men and lesbians have created families against all odds. Love, loyalty, commitment, mutual support: these things are family. They are scarce virtues that our society should do everything in its power to foster.

But that’s my opinion. And a society that truly believes in individual freedom will respect Mr. Cathy’s right to his views. Those who disagree with him are free to boycott Chick-fil-A in protest. But if our elected officials run Chick-fil-A out of town, they are effectively voting for all of us, regardless of our respective beliefs, and eliminating our individual freedoms.

And freedom, after all, is at the heart of the controversy over same-sex marriage. True individual freedom includes allowing consenting adults to marry the partners they choose, regardless of gender. To those for whom same-sex marriage is personally objectionable, their free choice is simple: Don’t enter into one. But don’t impede the freedom of others to do so. As long as Chick-fil-A operates within the boundaries of the law, municipalities and institutions should leave the decision about whether to eat at Chick-fil-A to individual consumers.

Leaving aside the rather ignorant surprise that elected officials in a representative democracy are voting on behalf of the population at large (were you asleep that day in Social Studies? Were you not allowed to watch Schoolhouse Rock?), this is all handwringing by a business guy.

No one’s taking actual official action to block Chick-Fil-A from opening anywhere as long as they’re in compliance with the law. Wal-Mart’s been blocked from opening in NYC before because of noncompliance with local labor laws, but not because of the Walton family being composed of jackasses. Whole Foods is helmed by a jackass, too, but they’re allowed to operate.

No, what these elected officials are doing is posturing. Politicking. Blustering. Showing their gay and gay-friendly constituents that they don’t approve of Cathy’s comments. Each of them admits that there’s not much they can do to prevent the company from opening or operating a store in their cities, but all of them are entitled to express an opinion. Just like the public figures who’ve supported Cathy are entitled to their opinions.

And each of the letters to Cathy have been pretty careful not to threaten official action against the company, beyond a condemnation of the views of the owner as against the values of the city.

Now, if any of them did take action against Chick-Fil-A, then, yes, I’d have a big problem with them. But none of them are.

So unclench. Your freedom to choose to eat crappy chicken is safe. But you can’t get it on Sundays.

Arizona Catholic school baseball players won’t make it to second base with a girl

As it is written, “Engage thyself not in coeducational sporting endeavors, lest thou get thine ass kicked by a gi-irl.”

Instead of playing in a championship baseball game, Paige Sultzbach and her team won’t even make it to the dugout.

A Phoenix school that was scheduled to play the 15-year-old Mesa girl and her male teammates forfeited the game rather than face a female player.

Christian group invites Thai sex workers to come to Daddy

This is the story of a video by eleven young women from the U.S.–almost exclusively white–who went to Thailand to save the “bar girls” to Jesus. “We found that we were the perfect ones to fight for them,” say the title cards. “Because we used to be women in chains… Just like them.”

Chastened?

Here’s the tl;dr for this post: Dawn Eden made herself a nuisance to this blog and others about five or six years ago. Just Google her name along with that of pretty much any feminist blogger or blog and you’ll see what I mean. Now she’s reared her head again, mentioning me and this blog (and my reviews of her first book) in an interview about her new book. I don’t care all that much about what she said about me, personally, but the interview and book bring up a lot of issues that Dawn and I (as well as other feminist bloggers) have gone at each other over before and which I feel merit a response. Dawn has long been an engaging if fundamentally dishonest writer, particularly on the subject of feminism and women’s sexuality, and in the interview and her book, she accuses feminists of, essentially, causing child sexual abuse by supporting sexual freedom for adult women. In addition, there’s a good bit of inside-baseball stuff about the Catholic church and the clerical sex abuse scandal, and how Dawn addresses – or rather, fails to address – that scandal in the context of a book, written from a specifically Catholic perspective, about using Catholic writings and teaching as a means of healing from childhood sexual abuse.

The Evangelical Christian Movement – Harm Reduction

I’m a solutions oriented person. Find a problem and fix it, I always say. Okay, usually I don’t say that…I just proceed with the fixing. But, to be honest, I’m not sure there are “solutions” in this particular situation. People are and, in my view, should always be free to believe and to worship as they deem necessary limited only by the principle that they are not permitted to cause direct harm to others. In a pluralistic world the best that we can do is try to convince people to agree with us instead of with them. And it’s my guess that no matter how brilliant our arguments are, there will still be a non-zero number of people who will consider me to be possessed by a demon. The question then is not “how do we stop people from believing things” since…well, I think Hagee said it best:

The Evangelical Christian Movement – Methods Part 2

As promised in this post I’m going to continue the analysis into the Evangelical Christian Movement’s methods for achieving social and political change. I suspect that this post may be…shall we say… controversial? The methods up for discussion today are community activism and child rearing.