In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Supreme Court Will Not Hear Troy Davis Case

Who knew that I could possibly be more disgusted by our Supreme Court?

Amnesty International is asking people to take more action for Troy Davis. From their email:

And by all means, do all of that. But I have to say that my hopes are very, very low at this point. And I really do think that very soon, the state of Georgia is going to kill an innocent man.

Previous posts about Troy Davis here and here.

UPDATE: A new date/time has been set for Davis’ execution.

If you’re in California…

I hope you’ll be getting to the polls on Nov. 4th.

Cara already detailed Proposition 8, and why you should vote NO (you believe in equality; you don’t think that gay and lesbian people should be second-class citizens; etc etc). So vote NO on 8.

But as long as you’re dropping your ballot in the box, I’d also encourage you to vote YES on Prop. 2, the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act. It’s a pretty simple measure — it simply requires that farm animals not be kept in cages so small that they are unable to turn around, lay down or stretch their limbs. It’s good for animals, good for the environment, and good for consumers.

There are some good arguments against Prop. 2, so do your research, but it seems to me that this is a small and important step towards greater regulations of cruel and dangerous factory farming practices.

Stand Up Against Prop 8

Thanks to my good friend Ali, it has come to my attention that Proposition 8, the anti-gay California ballot initiative which would overturn the recent ruling legalizing same-sex marriage in the state, has been gaining significant ground in the polls. According to an email sent out by Equality California, polls on October 7th showed that supporters of Prop 8 were up by five points — a huge reversal from the week before, where opponents of the initiative were up five points. The LA Times reports similar findings. This is frightening stuff.

The reversal has been largely attributed to new campaign ads put out by the Yes on 8 campaign, which are filled with blatant lies. The lies include assertions that if Prop 8 doesn’t pass, individuals could be sued for discrimination, that churches would lose their tax exempt status for refusing to marry same sex couples, and that children must be taught about the “correctness” of same-sex marriage in schools.

New ads are fighting back, but these things don’t pay for themselves. And guess what? More bad news: supporters of Prop 8 have raised significantly more money than opponents.

A few days ago, I wrote about the decision which legalized same-sex marriage in Connecticut, and being complacent and overly-confident like I think most of us have been, said “3 down, 47 to go.” Well unless action is taken, it might not be three for long.

Here’s what all of us can do:

1. Donate, donate, donate. I know it’s election season, and everyone is begging you for money. And there are a lot of worthy causes out there. But if you are able to give, this is probably the most important step that you can take to help the NO on Prop 8 campaign.

2. Spread the word. Write blog posts. Email friends and family. Urge others to donate, too.

3. Email Governor Schwarzenegger. Schwarzenegger has finally spoken out against Prop 8, but as a very high profile and influential politician, indeed one who is a Republican, he is in an excellent position to do more to actively campaign and dispel the myths that proponents of the initiative are spreading. Tell him so.

And if you’re in California:

4. Vote. And get your friends and family to vote, too.

5. Volunteer. Sign up today. Even if it’s only a couple hours of phone-banking, your effort can make a big difference.  Even if you’re not in California, you can still click that link and get info on phone-banking from home! (Thanks Pizza Diavola!)

6. Get visible. Bumper stickers, signs, buttons, whatever — showing people in a visible way that there is strong opposition to Prop 8 has a bigger influence on public opinion than you may think.

7. Write a letter to the editor. NO on Prop 8 has the tools to help you write your letter today. Do it, and remember that even if yours doesn’t get published, the more that get written, the more that will show up in print.

Did I forget something? Let me know and I’ll add it to the post. Now get to work!

cross-posted at The Curvature

South Dakota Live Action Camp

As I noted, I spent the weekend in Sioux Falls South Dakota, working with South Dakota Healthy Families to fight Initiated Measure 11, which would ban virtually all abortions in the state.

You probably remember that in 2006, anti-choicers got the legislature to pass a bill that would have banned abortion, even in cases of rape/incest, and where the health of the woman would be endangered — and when pro-choicers challenged the law and got it sent to a referendum, the ban was shot down 56% to 44%. Leslee Unruh and her ilk did not like this, and so now the proposed ban is back in force — only this time, with supposed and completely bullshit “exceptions” in place. In a state that is rather anti-choice, this does indeed make the task somewhat harder. And in a state with only around 500,000 registered voters (this is in fact a high number for a population of about 700,000), every vote really does matter. Thus, Planned Parenthood (along with other orgs like the ACLU, who was not present last weekend but will be this weekend) has been sending out people to help identify supporters — meaning people who are voting “no” — and there were around 40 of us this weekend.

We started out on Friday evening with an orientation — featuring former Feministe guest-blogger Shannon! — explaining the messaging that SD Healthy Families has been using in their campaign. Just from checking out their website, you can get a pretty clear idea of how this works. 1. Emphasize the message of “health” 2. Use the word “decision” (pro-choice research has indicated for some time now that the word “choice” does NOT resonate with a lot of people, including many who are in effect pro-choice, but for some reason the word “decision” does in fact tend to.) 3. When possible, talk about families making decisions, or women and families making decisions together and 4. put a heavy emphasis on the incredible fallibility of the supposed exceptions, specifically by pointing out that there is absolutely not a damn thing in there about fatal fetal abnormalities. As South Dakota apparently has a strong libertarian streak, another major point of discussion is government intrusion on personal decisions.

Read More…Read More…

Not My Gal

You can submit to the Not My Gal video project via YouTube; or, if you don’t have video capacity, remember that you can send your voting story into fauxrealtho-at-gmail-dot-com.

IMPORTANT: Time To Send Your Comments To HHS Is Running Out

I have previously written about the dangerous proposed Department of Health and Human Services rule that would endanger women’s access to reproductive health care. The rule, if instated, would allow health care workers to prevent women from knowing all of their health care options, including those regarding birth control — and would call government-funded providers “discriminatory” for refusing to hire such people, thus removing their funding.

The comment period for the proposed rule closes on September 25th.

If you have not already sent in your comments in opposition to the proposed HHS rule, please do so now. And get any/all of your pro-choice friends to do the same. Time is running out!

As of September 17th, 25,000 people had submitted comments to HHS through Planned Parenthood’s form. Thousands of others have sent in comments in opposition to the rule via other organization’s websites, or the direct email address consciencecomment@hhs.gov. But more comments are desperately needed before the deadline.

Again, send yours now.

To learn more about the proposed rule, you can visit Planned Parenthood’s fact sheet, or this Op Ed by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, which appeared in yesterday’s NY Times.

Help Us Keep Bitching

So, I’m currently reading an advance copy of Tricia Rose’s new book, The Hip-Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip-Hop – And Why It Matters. I’ve already flagged pages to post as part of the “Quoted” series, as well as planning a few arguments around Rose’s ideas to post as part of the Hip-Hop Feminist canon. I even have an interview scheduled for next Tuesday, where I planned to spend about an hour dissecting the book with the author.

But unfortunately, y’all might not ever read my interview, or the article that was supposed to spring from our discussion.

That’s because on the day I received my contract in the mail, Bitch Magazine posted a video by Andi Zeisler and Debbie Rasmussen saying that they may not be able to publish the next issue because they don’t have the money. Bitch is $40,000 short of what they need to publish next month’s issue. (That’s how much it costs to publish an issue, y’all.)

So, please help.

If you like the fact that there is a magazine dedicated to a feminist critique of pop culture, please help by subscribing or donating.

If you don’t know what Bitch is, please check out their website and their back issues.

If you have a small business, an Etsy store, whatever, please consider taking out an advertisement.

And if you like what I do, and you like how I write, please help as well. Bitch is one of the few publications that will actually publish a lot of the things I write about, without me worrying about what gets filtered out, or if they are going to edit the racial/gender analysis out of my pitch.

I know there are about 5,000 of you reading Racialicious each day. (I’m not sure on how many people visit Feministe, where I am going to cross post this, but I hope a lot.) If half of you take the time to donate $5.00, we’ve raised $12,500.00 and we would be a quarter of the way there.

I already gave you a head start – I donated $10.

Here’s the video from Andi & Debbie:

More Action For Troy Davis

Last week I wrote about the case of Troy Davis, a man who is scheduled to be executed by the state of Georgia on September 23rd, despite ample doubt regarding his guilt in the crime of murdering Police Officer Mark MacPhail. I asked you, along with numerous social justice organizations, to call the George State Board of Pardons and Paroles and ask for clemency or commutation of Davis’ sentence. You did, and our calls jammed the phones. But that same day, the Board inexplicably denied clemency and agreed that the state should go forward with his execution.

Amnesty International is now pleading for letters and emails to be sent to the Board of Pardons and Paroles. The Board, though they are not scheduled to meet on the matter again, can do so. They still have the right and capability to decide that Davis will not be put to death.

I know that there are some out there who believe that Troy Davis is guilty of murdering Officer MacPhail. In reading about this case, I have seen a lot of people get caught up in questions of guilt and innocence. Many seem to think, perhaps naturally, that this is the point.

But Davis’ actual guilt or innocence is not the point. For all I know, Davis may be guilty. It is my personal opinion that he’s innocent. But I could be wrong. I don’t know; I wasn’t there. But we do know that of the people who were there and who testified in Davis’ case, seven of nine have recanted. Several have signed statements that they were intimidated into their testimony by police. We do know that of the two witness who are remaining, one of them is the other principle suspect in the case, who has been implicated in 9 sworn affidavits. We know that Davis is a black man and MacPhail was a white man, and our country has a long, ugly and racist history of executing innocent black men for crimes (and often imagined crimes) against whites. We know that Davis was convicted not based on physical evidence of any kind, but solely on witness testimony, and now that testimony is no longer reliable.

This isn’t about guilt or innocence, it’s about the cornerstone of our legal system – reasonable doubt. Even if Davis were guilty, his execution on the 23rd of September would be a judicial travesty. I say that not only because of my belief that a government that willfully kills its citizens is not one that can be trusted, and that no government could ever be trusted, no matter what precautions are taken, to only execute the guilty. I say it because this case does not even meet the already shaky requirements that our system has for determining that someone ought to be put to death. Even if Davis were a coldblooded murder – and even if the State Board of Pardons and Paroles believed as much with all of their hearts – the evidence, quite simply, is not there. This case is about us having at least as much evidence of innocence as we do guilt. It’s about the unconscionable act of killing a man when we just don’t know the answer.

Time is running out, so send your email and letter today. I think the language that Amnesty has provided is quite good, but if you have the time to edit and personalize it, I urge you to strongly consider doing so. But sending the letter as it is currently written is better than sending no letter at all. And then, get your friends to do the same.

cross-posted at the Curvature

Harnessing the Power of Pop Culture

In the first 45 seconds of the trailer for Clueless, Cher Horowitz (played by Alicia Silverstone) gives one of the best rebuttals I have ever heard to opponents of providing asylum on our shores for oppressed people.

Yes, I’m serious.

Let’s reexamine the language (excerpted from Paul’s Ultimate Clueless Script):

SCENE IV – CLASSROOM DEBATE

MR HALL

Should all oppressed people be allowed refuge in America? Amber will take the con position. Cher will be pro. Cher, two minutes.

CHER

So, OK, like right now, for example, the Haitians need to come to America. But some people are all “What about the strain on our resources?” But it’s like, when I had this garden party for my father’s birthday right? I said R.S.V.P. because it was a sit-down dinner. But people came that like, did not R.S.V.P. so I was like, totally buggin’. I had to haul ass to the kitchen, redistribute the food, squish in extra place settings, but by the end of the day it was like, the more the merrier! And so, if the government could just get to the kitchen, rearrange some things, we could certainly party with the Haitians. And in conclusion, may I please remind you that it does not say R.S.V.P. on the Statue of Liberty?

(Class breaks into applause)

This segment was designed for us to laugh at the ridiculousness of Cher’s logic and her mispronunciation of Haitians (Haiti-ins!). But there is some truth in what she says.

Haitians need to come to America = Amnesty.

But some people are all “What about the strain on our resources?” = Opposition Arguments

And so, if the government could just get to the kitchen = Survey the situation

Rearrange some things = Reprioritize and reexamine how we use resources and we admit new entrants

We could certainly party with the Haitians = Grant amnesty, fix our selective and fractured policy.

And this line is classic: may I please remind you that it does not say R.S.V.P. on the Statue of Liberty?

It totally does not say R.S.V.P. on the Statue of Liberty. It actually says:

“Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name,
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

And yet, for the last few years, we’ve been having a debate around immigration which boils down to “everyone has to RSVP, we’ve got a velvet rope, and most of you aren’t invited to the party.” The tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free? Fuck ’em!

Where are all the other voices in this debate? We’re left out. So many conversations around public policy and theory are couched in a language that makes them inaccessible to the average person with a limited understanding of the issues. And if the language that we as progressives and feminists use is inaccessible to the average reader/listener/viewer, we lose out. This is the void that has been filled by regressive interest groups – they dominate the dialogue by using very simplistic messages to summarize their position. Messages like “they are evil” or “they hate our freedom.” These messages may not even be true – but they are easy to remember. And that’s the problem. A complex, nuanced message is harder to grasp than a simple catchy statement, and thus, less likely to stick.

So, in order to reach more people, progressives need to critically examine the messages we send, what we say, and how we present them.

To this end, we need to learn to harness the power of pop culture – taking a message, shortening it, adding some spin, and preparing it for mass consumption.

Back in May, the New York Times published an article describing the efforts of U.S. Campaign for Burma to sell their cause using celebrities like Ellen Page, Jennifer Aniston, and Will Ferrell. And yet, somehow, they are still having problems getting their message to catch on.

Read More…Read More…

Give $10 to a Feminist Cause, Win a Prize

Nice! Mac of Pesky Apostrophe is hosting a fundraiser for Medical Students for Choice:

After Roe v. Wade, hospitals stopped seeing a lot of injuries and deaths from illegal abortions and eventually most hospitals stopped performing them. As a result of this, as well as political pressure and fear of being targeted by anti-choice whackadoodles, many medical schools quietly removed abortion from their curriculum. Today your average first or second year medical student is lucky to get even a mention of abortion in a Pharmacology lecture, and it’s really rare for a third or fourth year student to see an abortion or abortion-related complication during the clinical part of their education. Even OB/GYN residents aren’t guaranteed education around abortion – only 50% of residency programs have an opt-out abortion rotation. I don’t particularly think it matters how one feels about abortion and whether it should be legal or illegal…I think we should want our doctors to be well-trained enough to deal with something that impacts over one-third of their female patients. Even if the doctor chooses not to perform abortions, don’t you think doctors should know something about it?

Look, 87% of U.S. counties lack an abortion provider and the pool of trained physicians willing to provide services continues to shrink (the statistics for Canada are no less depressing). Legalized abortion is under threat in this country, but the shrinking pool of providers threatens to make the legality issue irrelevant. And maybe you don’t care, maybe you’re thinking, “Good! We shouldn’t make it easy for women to find abortion services!” Well, consider this: most medical schools devote more class time to learning about Viagra than to all forms of contraception combined. Many medical students aren’t learning much at all about important things like sterilization procedures or pregnancy options counseling. You wonder why we keep hearing things about gynecologists refusing to prescribe birth control pills and perform vasectomies on unmarried men. And put into this context, the proposed Dept. of Health and Human Services regulations that would make it a federally-protected act to not just withhold information to patients on abortion and contraception, but provide false information, well…it’s frightening.

And so I’ll be running a fundraising drive to make better doctors. And there will be prizes!!! For every each $10 donated, your name will go in a drawing to win one of the following:

* one pair of handmade socks (you choose the color, I choose the pattern with input from you)
* one half pint of handmade watermelon rind relish
* one half pint of handmade peach butter
* one half pint of handmade plum barbecue sauce
* one half pint of handmade watermelon barbecue sauce
* one pint of handmade tomato-red wine sauce
* One handknit stuffed uterus
* One dozen of the most fantastic cookies you’ll ever eat: chocolate chip with sea salt. Made lovingly by me, y’all!
* Two skeins of handspun yarn

I have received a hand-knitted hat and a handspun skein of yarn from Mac over the years and can attest to their quality. Think about giving money to a good cause, and check her out on Twitter and at her blog to follow along. Her goal is $3000.