Gun control isn’t exactly my #1 issue. I’ve never touched a gun in my entire life, but I hear they can be a lot of fun on the shooting range. I don’t really get why leaving the gun industry totally unregulated is such an important issue for folks, but I do get why folks want the right to own guns. And I do think our completely unregulated gun culture is totally out of control. I also think it’s a losing political issue for Democrats (they seem to think so, too).
Since this VA-Tech shooting, there have been quite a few op/eds written about gun control. It’s obviously not as simple as “if there was gun control this would never have happened,” but our gun culture is pretty scary. The fact that our culture also embraces an ideal of masculinity that relies on “toughness” and aggression doesn’t help.
Without fail, whenever gun control comes up (or even whenever sexual assault or other forms of violence against women come up), someone chimes in with the argument that a woman can protect herself by toting a gun in her handbag, and that women owning guns is feminist. The “gun ownership is feminist” argument is often trotted out by anti-feminists in feminist clothing. And the gun-toting little girl at the top of this page provides seemingly unending fodder for unsympathetic readers looking for a “gotcha!” point (for the love of God — and for the last time — it’s irony, people, not a call to arm four-year-olds).
So the feminist/gun thing comes up fairly often, and it’s through that lens that I read Elayne Boosler’s op/ed in the Huffington Post today. I don’t agree with every word, but it’s a very good read, so do check it out. But here’s what stood out to me:
The number of children under the age of 17 shot by guns in America every year is greater than the gun-related deaths of children in all the industrialized nations of the world COMBINED.
Here is the population of Japan: 127,463,611.
Here is the number of children killed by guns in Japan every year: 0.
A 2001 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study found that in homicides among intimate partners, women are murdered more with guns than with all other means COMBINED.
In 2004, guns were most commonly used by males to murder their female partners.
A 2003 study found women living with a gun in the home were almost three times more likely to be murdered than women with no gun in the home.
(The children thing isn’t the feminist part, I just thought it was interesting).
So guns kill women. A lot of women. And women who live in a home where there’s a gun are much more likely to be murdered. In other words, guns violence has not been particularly good for women, and owning a gun is potentially deadly, not empowering.
That said, I won’t take away your feminist membership card if you’re a big Second Amendment person (although I would ask you to read the first half of the sentence). Thinking guns are fun isn’t anti-feminist. Owning a gun isn’t anti-feminist. But I’m pretty tired of the “vulnerable women need guns for self defense and that is totally feminist” schtick.