In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The best thing you will read today about Breaking Dawn

And vampire-fetus-babies and misogyny and female desire and abuse and rough sex and mother-martyrs:

Welcome to the twisted glory that is Mormon housewife turned teen-lit sensation Stephenie Meyer’s imagination.

On the pages of Breaking Dawn Meyer let that imagination, which has been hovering under the repressed surface of the series’ previous three books, run rampant: Bedboard-breaking, feather-spilling, bruising honeymoon sex. A demonic pregnancy that grows so fast the fetus is nudging and jumping around the heroine’s womb days after conception. A grown-up werewolf falling in love with a half-vampire infant. And our heavily-pregnant heroine sipping blood from a soda cup–and loving it–just before her ribs and spine are shattered by the immortal spawn she’s carrying. It gets better: a c-section performed by vampire teeth. A shot of venom straight to the heart. A crazed childless vampire woman who will protect the fetus at all costs.

“One Abuse Script with Many Faces”

We’ve been discussing gaslighting as an abuse tactic in two previous posts in response to this article by Yashar Ali who reassures us that we ladies are not crazy (thanks). In the first, Caperton dissects Ali’s message directly and the problems with male allies presenting problems analyzed by feminists as new and novel issues. In the second, I tried to clarify the definition of gaslighting and invited the readership to share their own personal experiences with this form of emotional abuse, for one because it’s a tool commonly used by abusers in abusive relationships, and two because it’s so often used against women. What bothered me was that Ali’s explanation of gaslighting chalked it up to what we commonly experience as everday sexism, when in reality gaslighting is a particularly insidious form of emotional abuse that primes abuse victims to accept increasing levels of abuse.

I discussed this briefly with Captain Awkward for her insight, in part because she so extensively discusses the importance of boundaries at her blog, and as she wisely put it in our correspondence, “You need a power differential (patriarchy, for example) for true gaslighting – it relies on power and stereotypes.” In a typical heteronormative abuse model, for example, this form of emotional abuse is often levied against women by men, and it works precisely because of prejudices about femininity and masculinity — that women are nervous, hysterical, less prone to intelligent reasoning, and need protected and corrected by a rational man who is not swayed by his emotions. Of course this isn’t true across the board — it happens frequently in abusive same-sex relationships and parent-child relationships (which exploits the child’s dependent status) as well.

Because gaslighting is part and parcel of a larger system of abuse, it can be difficult to tease out exact incidents and outcomes and differentiate them from the larger experience of the abusive relationship. Some commenters expressed confusion over lying versus gaslighting, and whether this is something that is always conscious or whether it can be subconscious as well. “Gaslighting” is a colloquial term and not a clinical one (Practitioners, is there an official recognition of this behavior?), so there is some disagreement on how it’s applied. For our discussion, I consider gaslighting to be a repeat, systematic series of lies that are designed to make the victim doubt her reality. It’s not one lie or two lies, it’s part of a pattern of abuse meant to make the victim more compliant to minimize the effects of abuse, accept blame, and accept the abuser’s version of events that are contrary to her own. In other words, it’s death by a thousand cuts.

Gaslighting can be intentional, such as with the example from the play and its movie adaptations, or the example I use here, where a partner purposely moves or hides your stuff to make you feel forgetful and untethered to your memory.

Gaslighting can also be an unintentional side-effect, as a classic outcome of living with a narcissist, or with a partner who is trying to cover up their pattern of abuse, or with the addict trying to cover up their addiction. It is done in order to preserve the … [gaslighter’s] vision of himself” as an honest and upstanding person without actually doing the things that would make it so.

Gaslighting can be physical or emotional. An example of physical gaslighting is the example from the movie or from my example in comments. An anonymous reader emailed me with this horrifying example of physical gaslighting:

I knew someone who lived in his mother-in-law’s house and would do things like reorder the kitchen cabinets (switching the plates to the opposite side of the room) to make her think she was going crazy in the hopes that he could have her committed to a home and he could get the house.

For a sidebar discussion, I’ve heard a practitioner say that this kind of gaslighting is so vindictive and insidious that if someone is pulling a physical gaslight on you and you’re able to identify it, drop everything and run the other way and never stop running from this person.

An example of emotional gaslighting is evident in the recollection of CurrerBell in comments, where the denial of abuse was encouraged in her childhood home in order to preserve peace with a trigger-prone mother.

It’s not limited to interpersonal relationships either. As smash points out in the comments, an example was highlighted recently in Ask Prudie where a guy is bullied by his coworkers, who tell him he has bad breath and harangue him about it at work, while his dentist and doctor tell him there is no issue at all.

Overall, gaslighting has the gradual effect of making the victim anxious, confused, and less able to trust their own memory and perception, which makes you less likely to fight back or feel confident accusing the abuser of bad faith later when he’s siphoning money off of you, for example, or isolating you from your friends and family. And later, when your work and school performance suffers because of the nagging dread you have at home, your abuser blames it on the shortcomings he’s defined you by, so it’s your fault that you’re stupid and unreliable, which is why no one likes you and you’re ugly and you can’t even pick up the cat right. The pattern of lying and denial is meant to make you more susceptible to validating their version of events, and it’s almost always a version where the abuser is the sympathetic party and the victim is a dumb, petty asshole for concentrating on who did what when. It’s meant to tear you down and it’s often effective because you are trying to fight fair with someone who is intentionally slippery. As part of a larger system of abuse, it makes you vulnerable to accept escalations of abuse AND attribute them to your OWN failure and not the ill will of the abuser.

About a dozen women wrote me privately and anonymously to share their experiences, and they had so much insight and wisdom and humor that I hope I do them justice and crystallize their experiences here. Because I think it’s tempting for us survivors to focus on the abuser, which can be detrimental for our recovery, I also asked them to recollect how they put the pieces back together after leaving the relationship. What follows below are bits and pieces of these anonymous conversations, both about gaslighting and abusive relationships in general. While I originally intended to focus on gaslighting alone, there were too many invaluable insights to pare them down.

This is a giant beast of a discussion on emotional and physical abuse and its affects on our mental health, and as such this is your neon, flashing trigger warning.

Read More…Read More…

More on Gaslighting

Gaslighting is a particular kind of emotional abuse, whether intentional or not, that over time makes the abused feel that her perception of reality or of herself is false. The gaslighter manipulates the victim’s sense of self in order “to be right [and] preserve his own sense of self.” From wikipedia:

Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse in which false information is presented with the intent of making a victim doubt his or her own memory and perception. It may simply be the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred, or it could be the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term “gaslighting” comes from the play Gas Light and its film adaptations. In those works a character uses a variety of tricks, including turning the gas lamps lower than normal, to convince his spouse that she is crazy.

In the post on gaslighting below, there are several people sharing stories about how they were gaslighted (gaslit?) in romantic and in parent-child relationships in the comments. Although Yassar Ali, the author of the article that Caperton deftly dissects below, doesn’t have his understanding of gaslighting quite right, he is correct that it’s a form of emotional abuse that is often levied against women, and it works precisely because of prejudices about femininity, that women are nervous, hysterical, and less prone to intelligent reasoning. Probably the most common form of gaslighting reported is in a domestic violence situation where the abuser flatly denies that any abuse happened at all — leaving the abused to “prove” that the abuse happened not only to bystanders and authorities, but eventually to herself. Gaslighting also happens frequently in parent-child relationships, in which the parent denies abuse or neglect to continue to appear to be a good parent, and the child eventually accepts that their own perceptions of reality and memory are suspect because of the parents’ systematic denial of abuse. Another form of gaslighting is when a person tries to make you believe you are something (usually negative) that you are not, clumsy, slutty, dumb. A gaslighter, in other words, is trying to rewire the narrative to preserve a positive self-image, even at the expense of the people around him.

In the interest of information-sharing and catharsis, I want to solicit your gaslighting experience stories and I will arrange and publish them here. If you’d like to share them in your own space, please feel free to send me a link. Please let me know whether you wish to remain anonymous, and email me before the end of the day on Friday, 11/18/11. Send emails to fauxrealtho at gmail with the title “Gaslight” or leave them in the comments. Forgive my pronoun usage, as I am using heteronormative language to describe this dynamic, but it happens to everyone. My thought is that by sharing en masse we can represent this experience as women better than Ali was able.

____________
This is a guest post by Lauren Bruce, founder of and former resident blogger at Feministe, who has, shall we say, an intense personal interest in this subject.

Young woman captures her father’s abusive actions on tape

A young Texas woman with cerebral palsy was whipped and beaten by her father for downloading games and music — and she stealthily recorded the whole thing, then posted it to YouTube. A major wrinkle is that the girl’s abusive father is allegedly Aransas County Court-At-Law Judge William Adams.

The video is incredibly disturbing, graphic and violent; I only watched a few seconds before shutting it off. It’s safe to click through to the Gawker link, but don’t watch the video if you aren’t prepared to see prolonged and horrific abuse.

This video was shot in 2004, and she’s been hanging on to it since then. She’s a brave woman for putting this out there, and it has reportedly been forwarded on to Child Protective Services and other relevant authorities. It’s not clear whether she still lives with her father, but I hope that this helps her to get as much distance from him as she needs.

This is also a good time to point out that people with disabilities are the victims of abuse at a rate 4 to 10 times that of the general population. People with disabilities often can’t report abuse, or feel like they can’t because reporting may mean losing a care-taker. When they do, they’re often disbelieved, or the abuse isn’t taken seriously. Since abuse often comes at the hands of a caretaker, authorities are often hesitant to follow up, or don’t consider the abuse “that bad” — the reasoning being, I guess, that care-taking is hard and often frustrating work and so we should give care-takers a little more wiggle room, even if that “wiggle room” includes abuses and violations.

Simply reporting the abuse that this woman suffered should be enough. But unfortunately, for a lot of people with disabilities, speaking out doesn’t solve the problem. Good on her for making sure people notice.

Thanks, Tom Foolery, for the link.

Domestic Violence is an Every Day Issue

This is a guest post by Katherine Greenier.
While October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month, it may be the grim August murder of Crystal Ragin and her three children in Newport News that serves as the year’s most dramatic reminder that more must be done to protect women from violence.

Another day, another man kills his ex-wife, MRAs cheer

A man in California shot and killed his ex-wife and seven other people last week. The two were involved in a bitter custody dispute over their son. The story is incredibly sad, but men’s rights activists (“MRAs,” going forward) have again taken it as a lesson in the evils of both women and a legal system that promotes the ideal that both parents should have rights. American laws have evolved to reflect the fact that mothers are more than mere incubators to produce children for men, and MRAs are not so much on board with that. Divorce laws that give both parents custody of the children but that may limit custody when one parent is abusive or violent apparently “drive” men to shoot their ex-wives and seven bystanders. So, limiting custody when a parent is abusive or violent is “misandrist” (a word that is right up there with “reverse racism” in terms of usefulness or accuracy) because men aren’t really violent, bitches just lie to steal a man’s kids from him; but when men whose custody is limited because of accusations of violence proceed to act violently by killing their exes, their kids, themselves or innocent bystanders, well, bitches made him do it.

It’s worth noting that the shooter in the California case was in fact given an equal custody split with his ex; that didn’t seem fair, apparently.

Like David, I don’t know any details of the shooter’s ideology or politics, but the MRA reaction has been predictable (though nonetheless startling). MRAs are, quite simply, men who hate women. They especially hate feminists, or women with opinions beyond “Whatever you think, dear.” Because they believe men are superior, they also believe that men should have pretty much free reign to behave however they want towards their women and their children. They believe that violence is often necessary to maintain control, and that judges who declare that children should be placed in non-violent households are anti-male. They believe that violence is provoked by women who don’t know their place. Case(s) in point:

Essentially men need to tell feminism to shut the fuck up, give it a vigorous slap across the face thus reminding it who is the biological superior, then order it back into the kitchen/bedroom.

Gandi [sic] and MLK got what they were after via non-violent means, but they were dealing with people of conscience, people who would think about the issues they espoused and not just kill them. Non-violence only works when your opponent has moral character. …

I submit that women … are much more likely to pay attention when they’re being threatened. If it becomes obvious that claiming child abuse during divorce, withholding visitation and other such actions could result in their death, then they might think twice about such behavior.

You can read more at Man Boobz.

Because the whole “rule of thumb” thing is so three months ago

October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month all over the country–even in Kansas. But someone needs to tell the city of Topeka that October isn’t actually supposed to be a celebration of domestic violence. If you wanted to observe it by, say, making domestic battery not illegal anymore, you’d probably be missing the point.

The background: Shawnee County District Attorney Chad Taylor announced that due to budget cuts, his office can’t afford to prosecute misdemeanors (including domestic battery) and will cease to do so.

The complaint: If the district attorney isn’t going prosecute domestic battery, the city (which already handles simple assault and battery on its own) is going to have to do it themselves, and they don’t have the resources.

The plan: Fuck that, right? If the city just repeals their domestic battery law, that makes it not illegal to beat your spouse, the city has nothing to prosecute, the district attorney is required to take over, and everybody wins! With the exception of the battered spouses, of course, but whatevs.

Read More…Read More…

Meaningful Enforcement in the War Against Domestic Abuse

By Madeline Lee Bryer, cross-posted at On The Issues Magazine

*Trigger warning*

The war against domestic violence is heating up. In a decision released publicly on August 17, 2011, an international human rights tribunal has determined that the U.S. authorities paid insufficient attention to domestic violence and violence against women in violation of the nation’s human rights obligations. This ruling, the first ruling from an international tribunal on a U.S. domestic violence case, comes only days before an important domestic violence case is heard by New York State’s highest court.

The decision from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) reviewed the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Castle Rock v. Gonzales.

The Supreme Court held that Jessica Gonzales, a domestic violence victim who had an order of protection against her husband, had no constitutional right to police protection or enforcement of her order of protection.

Read More…Read More…

That’s an interesting definition of “victim” you’ve got there

Well this is a new level of apologism and fuckery:

The brother of the man who likely murdered his daughter before taking his own life tells FOX40 that his brother, Mourad “Moni” Samaan, was the victim of a broken family court system.

Nabil Samaan, a lawyer and father, claims his brother’s ex-wife waged a brutal custody battle that pushed Mourad over the edge. According to court records provided to us by Nabil, Mourad’s ex-wife is Marcia Fay, a California Deputy Attorney General.

“In every battle there’s an end, and this is the end. …You can justify or try to argue that Moni wasn’t a good father, and that’s just denying the facts. The facts that he was an exceptional father,” Nabil Samaan said Sunday.

I’m going to go ahead and say that murdering your child pretty much revokes your “good father” card. And you know who’s a victim? A little girl whose daddy kills her. You know who’s not a victim? A dude who was pissed off because he didn’t get exactly what he wanted from the court system.

Nabil says that Mourad and his ex-wife couldn’t even agree on a name for their daughter. The Samaan’s referred to the little girl as Layla, and the Fay’s referred to her as Madeline.

Last week, the FBI issued an Amber Alert for Madeline Layla Samaan-Fay. Agents say her father Mourad was supposed to return her to her mother but did not. On Saturday, the FBI discovered the bodies of the little girl and her father in an SUV parked in El Dorado County near some land the Samaan family owns.

“I think he did the right thing. I’m proud of my brother and now he’s in a better place. He’s at peace. His daughter’s at peace. She’ll have one name now, and we can move on. And hopefully the court will learn a little thing about justice,” Nabil said.

FOX40 asked if that’s how he really felt, and he reiterated his point.

“I think justice was done as Moni saw it, and as I see it, frankly. I think under the circumstances, justice was done.”

A little girl was murdered because her father would rather she died than compromise on her name. That’s not justice. That’s evil.

Now let’s start the countdown until this guy becomes an MRA hero.

via ATL.