In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Women With Disabilities at Higher Risk for Intimate Parnter Violence

A new study (reiterating things that previous studies have already told us) shows that women with disabilities* are for more likely than women without disabilities to be the victims of intimate partner violence (h/t). The study looked at physical violence (hitting, kicking, etc.), threats of physical violence, and sexual violence. Across the board, women with disabilities were about twice as likely to have been subjected to these forms of violence by an intimate partner.

Intimate partner violence is “an understudied issue in much need of attention,” Dr. Brian Armor, who led the study, told Reuters Health. “We need to ensure that prevention initiatives designed to reduce intimate partner violence explicitly include the needs of adults with disabilities (e.g. ensuring shelters are accessible).

To estimate disability prevalence and differences in intimate partner abuse among women with and without a disability, Armor and his colleagues from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, analyzed data from the CDC’s 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System — a large annual telephone survey of Americans designed to monitor the prevalence of key health behaviors.

They found that women with a disability were significantly more likely than women without a disability to report experiencing some from of intimate partner violence in their lifetime (37.3 percent versus 20.6 percent).

Women with a disability were more likely to report ever being threatened with violence (28.5 percent vs 15.4 percent) and hit, slapped, pushed, kicked or physically hurt (30.6 percent vs. 15.7 percent) by an intimate partner.

Women with a disability were also much more apt to report a history of unwanted sex by an intimate partner (19.7 percent vs 8.2 percent).

The study’s leader reflects on some of the likely reasons behind the disparities:

“Perhaps, women with disabilities are vulnerable to intimate partner violence because their disability might limit mobility and prevent escape; shelters might not be available or accessible to women with disabilities; the disability might adversely affect communication and thus the ability to alert others or the perpetrator might control or restrict the victim’s ability to alert others to the problem.”

Fear is another possibility, Armor said. “That is, a catch-22, stemming from reliance on the perpetrator for caregiving needs that might go unmet or lead to some form of undesirable placement if they tell authorities.”

He concluded, “Since intimate partner violence is a public help problem, we need to ensure that prevention strategies for people with disabilities are widely adopted.”

For more, see Women With Disabilities Australia (WWDA), which has a great long list of international resources on violence against women with disabilities.

* Though this study only looks at women, it’s important to emphasize that men with disabilities are also vulnerable to intimate partner violence.  I also don’t put it past the CDC to have defined “women” only as “cisgender women,” and so it bears noting that transgender PWDs are at risk just as much if not more than cisgender PWDs.

taking over DC

Hi folks,

My guest-blogging stint at Feministe ends tomorrow and I’ve been a terrible blogger. I hope you will forgive me for not posting more.

In the meantime, I wanted to share news of a non-violent civil disobedience disability rights group, ADAPT, that is taking DC by storm. 600 ADAPTers are in DC fighting for affordable, accessible housing. At 4:30 am this morning they set up a tent city (named DUH City– HUD backwards) outside of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). They spent the day talking to HUD officials, protesting at McCain’s headquarters (11 arrests, I believe), and being escorted by the police to the Democratic National Headquarters to deliver information.  Our feminist friends over at FRIDA are with them.

picture of 2 ADAPT women leading press conference
picture of 2 ADAPT women leading press conference

The action will go on through out this week. You can follow them on twitter (via cell phone or the web), visit the website DuhCity, or get updates from me at my blog (they’re hosting a blog media swarm where 40+ bloggers will be posting updates from ADAPT).

FREE OUR PEOPLE!!

love to you all,

cripchick

introduction to cripchick and the mda telethon

Hello, all! Cripchick checking in—Thanks to the lovely Feministe folks here, I’ll be guest-blogging for the next two weeks.

A little bit about myself:

I identify as a queer, disabled, radical woman of color interested in an intersectional approach to ending oppression. I recently started blogging in the last year and am amazed at how much it has changed my life (very interested in using the internet for community-building). Even though I sometimes struggle with the disability community, the Disability Rights Movement is home for me and is where I came to understand why it’s important to organize. Most of my writing here will centralize disability as a feminist issue.

And on that note (nice transition, eh?), I wanted to share last year’s Labor Day blog carnival around the Jerry Lewis MDA telethon with you. Every year, Jerry Lewis hosts a big telethon [fundraising event where people call in by phone to give money] to raise funds for the Muscular Dystrophy Association. Many disabled people have protested this fundraising method because of its pitiful poster children images. These images are designed to make you feel sorry for disabled people and/or fear disability. As many often point out, it makes it really difficult to go to a job interview if an organization representing people like you has told your boss you needed pity, not equal opportunity or justice. These images of pity and charity infiltrate every part of our life.

Many disabled people also protest the telethon because they believe that the focus should not be on curing— or eradicating— disability but improving access to society and accepting people as they are. An example of this is in Jerry’s 1990 Parade Magazine article where he talks about the hardships we face with inaccessibility. Jerry’s solution to this problem is a cure for disability while the disability community’s solution to this would be to make accessible bathrooms.

You can check out the Telethon Protest Blog Carnival at Kara’s place and read more about anti-telethon efforts at Ragged Edge Magazine and Laura Hershey’s Crip Commentary website.

“One-Legged Hooker Slain”

That is the New York Post* title on the death of Elizabeth Acevedo.  Who is now dead.  A 38 year old woman who was disabled, and happened to be a prostitute.   Oh, yeah, and police are still looking for a suspect.  Or something.  Kinda.  Worth mentioning down there at the bottom of the short screed on this woman’s death. 

Renee at Womanist Musings has more on how some folk are just funny funny har-haring over the whole deal.

Am I surprised?  Surprised that people can turn this woman’s death into comedy, or rail on about how she happened to be a prostitute, a disabled one at that, and spend as much time talking about her record for non-violent crimes and criminal lifestyle as they do, oh, about the fact that she was murdered?  Nope, not at all.  If she were a white man, or a non-fallen women (a white one, especially) do you think there’d be some outrage there?  A demand for, oh, actual respect for the dead and justice?  I bet there would be.

There is a reason I don’t like people as a general rule…

 

*fixed!

Bodily Autonomy:Jehovah’s Witness Teens and Blood Transfusions

Lately, I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about bodily autonomy. It seems to me that when feminists discuss this issue it is usually with regards to reproductive justice. However, I’ve got something different in mind right now and I’m hoping that others could give me some input on it.

As a member of disability culture, I have witnessed how those within my community are particularly susceptible to having our wishes ignored even when we are able to express ourselves quite clearly. I’m not just referring to those situations that happen during our day to day lives. It’s really aggravating to hear about how often non-disabled people feel free to just grab someone’s wheelchair and move it without even asking for permission from the person sitting in the chair. Things much worse than this occur inside of hospitals all the time. Medical professionals sometimes exhibit the same ablism I’ve witnessed in public. Given this environment, I’m loathe to say that doctors should be given permission to over-ride a patient’s stated will. However, I am beginning to think that my view may need to be reassessed.

When it comes to abortion, my feeling is that teenagers want them should be able to have them. I don’t think we need the state deciding whether or not a person should continue a pregnancy. For me, it’s really cut and dry. However, should this apply to all medical decisions that a teenager wants to make?

Read More…Read More…

Woman With Muscular Dystrophy Had to Crawl Off Plane

This is outrageous and angered me to my very core:

On July 20th, Julianna’s (delayed) Delta flight landed in Atlanta at 7:30pm, with a connecting flight scheduled for 8:05pm. Julianna, who has muscular dystrophy, missed the connecting flight because nobody came with a wheelchair until 8:05—the same time the connecting flight took off. To make matters worse, the plane crew told Julianna she might make the flight anyway if she stopped waiting for help and got off the plane right now, so she crawled down the stairs on her own. When the wheelchair came she was “wheeled into a back room and advised” that her plane had taken off. But that was just the first half of her ordeal, and the next eight hours only got worse.

The rest of the Consumerist post contains Julianna’s letter to Delta, describing what she went through for the next several hours, including: the continued struggle to find someone to help her travel to her new gate, pleading with the employee pushing her to allow her to have a bathroom break, and being unable to obtain water or food for hours, because no one would help her and she was unable to transport herself with the manual wheelchair provided by the airline. When she finally arrived at her destination airport at 3:15AM, she again had to crawl onto the shuttle service in order to get home.

Read More…Read More…

Get It Straight, Sil Vous Plait

What the deal with how Elizabeth Edwards is being portrayed in the reports about her husband’s philandering?

It might not seem like a big deal to other people but, I just want to yell into the television every time I hear someone refer to Elizabeth Edwards as “terminally ill”. This woman is not dying, at least any more than you or I or anyone else is dying. Edwards is still walking around smiling and talking and taking care of her children. What more does a person have to do to be considered among the ranks of those still living? Can we stop with the news reports calling this woman’s cancer “terminal”? Please? Yes, she does have cancer, but it isn’t terminal. It’s incurable. There’s a helluva difference between the two.

Oh, and would it be too much to ask for these two jerks to just shut up?

Is it worth the risk?

Well, what’s the risk?

A lot of people took this tack in response to my PSA post. If I minorly annoy 49 people, but save one life!, isn’t it worth the risk?

Psssst: your privilege is showing.

See, here’s your thought process: If there’s a one-in-fifty chance my drive-by suggestions will help, it’s worth it!

But aren’t you forgetting someone? Forty-nine someones?

What’s the risk?

Here’s the risk.

Read More…Read More…

On a meta note

I wanted to thank all the commenters who have left me encouraging notes, and everyone who chimed in to the discussions over the past couple days. You can really tell when you struck that tuning fork just right, because everybody comes out to talk about it 🙂

There were also more than a couple people who expressed surprise/relief to find people who are facing the same issues they face every day. I wanted to encourage you all to keep talking about these things.

I started my blog mainly because our experiences are kept in the dark like this so often. It is considered inappropriate to discuss certain experiences, and pretty much anything involving disability falls into that column. It is a “private” matter. And even where it isn’t necessarily considered inappropriate, sometimes it seems out of place, talking openly about such personal things when most of the conversation focuses on the abstract, the theoretical.

Remember: the personal is political.

The more we speak up about our experiences, the more people we find who have gone through the same thing, and the more we can learn from each other, and discover exactly how common some of those experiences are — and thus, understand that those experiences are not our own personal failures, but the result of a society-wide approach to the issues we face.

And the more we speak up, the more other people, who don’t share those experiences, hear. The more information they have, straight from the people affected, rather than the (very limited) mainstream conversation that tends to exclude those people de facto. And thus the better understanding we can all form about these issues.

You are not obligated to speak. You can share exactly as much as you are comfortable sharing. But to those people who feel relief upon meeting another person who understands all of those “private” things that weren’t “relevant” to the conversation before: Speak up. I want to hear you. Start a blog. Comment on other people’s blogs. Make no secret of your day to day, minute-to-minute experiences, even when speaking with people in “real life.”

Don’t consider your condition a secret, or a severely personal matter, which doesn’t affect anyone else, and therefore interests no one else. Because a lot of us are interested. And their issues affect you. Don’t let that street stay one-way.

There are understandable circumstances where one would not want to be so open. I am trying to keep my disabilities as hidden as possible while searching and interviewing for jobs. Maybe a family member has a thing about the subject and you don’t want to rehash things over and over again. Maybe another person reacts negatively, or you sense that they would, and you don’t feel like dealing with that. That is all perfectly fine. But the oath of secrecy we are all made to take seems to extend to situations far, far beyond these. And I want to break down those barriers.

I don’t think I’ve ever felt so satisfied in my life as when people step of the Google bus, or a link from another site, or whatever, to read my writing, and write to say that they have gone through the same thing and they had never heard anyone talk about it openly before. It gives me hope.

There are people out there right now who are going through the same things you face, every single day. And a lot of those people have no idea that there are other people out there going through those same things. Because we’re taught not to talk about it.

But maybe, if you talk about it, one of them will hear you. And their life will be a little bit easier, knowing that they aren’t the only ones.

Start talking.