In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Because We Need and Deserve It: Pull it together, POTUS

Michelle Obama giving the stink-eye to the president as he cracks up during filming of their 2012 Christmas address
I love this man, and he is the father of my children. I love this man, and he is the father of my children. I love this man, and he is…

Surviving this year has been an accomplishment. I’m serious: The past twelve months have been so fraught with threats to the general physical and mental health of our nation and its citizens (and, for that matter, the rest of the world) that continuing to be up and around is a sign of individual fortitude and a supportive community. This is not to say that the ones we’ve lost lacked fortitude — just that 2017 was essentially a 365-day ordeal, even more so for many than for others. Everyone reading this represents a time in which, for all of the things and people that have failed us over the past year, at least a few things have held up. Unfortunately, all those things that held up are going to be even more sorely taxed throughout 2018, so I invite you to take comfort, strength, and encouragement of President Barack Obama getting the irrepressible giggles during the filming of his first White House Christmas address.

May we all take on 2018 with the patience and perseverance of Michelle Obama as her goofy-ass husband can’t get through a single sentence to shoot a four-minute video. Happy New Year, y’all.

Alabama Senate election open thread

Doug and Louise Jones stand on stage amid a cloud of confetti after Doug's victory in the Alabama Senate special election Dec. 12
Us, too, Doug Jones. Us, too. (Photo (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

On Tuesday night, something momentous happened: The people of Alabama elected a Democratic senator for the first time in over 25 years. By the tiniest of margins — 49.9 percent to 48.4 percent — voters picked Doug Jones over disgraced judge and accused child molester Roy Moore. So there’s a lot to discuss there.

A few things to consider:

– Well, there’s the whole “48.4 percent voted for an accused child molester” part.

– Abortion played a huge role in influencing votes — Moore’s main response to the accusations that he’s a child predator was “Doug Jones kills babies!” and many of his unwavering apologists talked about how Jones supports due-date abortions and no, he does not, and also, those aren’t a thing and a lot of voters who opted for a write-in vote said they did so because they could vote neither for a child molester nor for a pro-choice Democrat.

– Exit polls show that 72 percent of white men and 63 percent of white women voted for Moore, and a staggering 93 percent of black men and 98 percent of black women voted for Jones. As liberals in and outside of Alabama thank black women for, once again, saving us from ourselves, we have to consider about damn when we’re going to stop relying on POC to carry the weight. Anecdotally, from the perspective of one white woman on the ground in Birmingham, the vast majority of black women I’ve talked to were a) pissed at the Jones campaign and the DSCC for ignoring them until the very end of the election, and not terribly interested in voting for Jones, and b) still willing to vote for Jones just because the prospect of Senator Roy Moore was so terrifying. And they came out in record numbers.

– With the number of write-in votes (1.7 percent) exceeding the difference in votes between the first two candidates (1.5 percent), the state of Alabama is required, by law, to now count all of the write-in votes. So by next Tuesday, we’ll all know if Nick Saban came in third place in the Alabama Senate special election.

So yeah, Alabama is sending a Democrat to the Senate. What’s on your mind?

Reproductive organs: This is the shit I’m talking about

Three blood bags, with female/moon goddess symbols on them, labeled "Sacred Blood of the Divine Feminine - Only for Use in Flux with the Universe"
Oh, you didn’t think I was going to post a picture of my sacred passage, did you?

[Trigger warning: transphobia]

This is the shit I’m talking about: TERFs love to insist that women are not defined by our reproductive organs, until they need an excuse to exclude trans women, at which point we’re defined exclusively by our reproductive organs. And they always have to throw in a little goddess-moon-divine-menstruation magic, too, and that’s another one: Conservative Christians using their religion to police women’s bodies is wrong, but using sacred-divine-goddess mysticism is perfectly acceptable for TERFy purposes. Seriously, if you’re a pagan and/or identify with your reproductive system at an essentialist level, I’m glad you’ve found something that makes you happy, but you don’t get to force it on other women.

Trans women are males. They do not bear children, breastfeed, hail from a divine feminine, house a sacred passage, sacrifice blood, sync w phases, flow in flux w universe. They just want the superficial benefits of a social construct but don’t bear the stripes.

There is nothing that isn’t stupid about that.

(Also, from a medical standpoint: If women really are in sync with moon phases and the universe and shit, wouldn’t we all have our period at the same time? By that logic, the streets should be flowing with blood every 28 days.)

Now that I think about it, evangelicals and TERFs both appear to have a weird fixation on sacred motherhood and sacrifices and divine blood. And they both like to victimize trans people. They should really get together, since they have so much in common. #TERFvangelicals

Mika Brzezinski wants to know if it’s cool to attack accusers we don’t like.

A screenshot from "Morning Joe" with Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough, with chyron "Franken hits GOP for supporting Trump and Moore despite sexual misconduct allegations against them"
“When you say ‘women,’ do you mean, like, all women? Not the ones who are accusing my dude, right? Asking for a friend.”

Bite my ass, Mika.

Yesterday, Minnesota Sen. Al Franken announced his pending resignation after a seventh woman has come forward to accuse him of sexual harassment and dozens of Senate Democrats have called on him to step down. His announcement was that classic mix of “I don’t remember it that way” and “I’m sorry if anyone was offended” and “but Donald Trump and Roy Moore, though” that, delivered properly, almost sounds contrite if you don’t listen to it too closely.

This morning, on Morning Joe, Mika Brzezinski stood up for Franken by identifying his first accuser, Leeann Tweeden, as a Playboy model and a Republican, and asking if maybe “I believe women” doesn’t have to apply to all women. Y’know, like women who are accusing a man you like.

We’ve never really talked about the woman who first came out against Al Franken, whose picture that you say, Susan, is just the death knell. I would think a dress owned by Monica Lewinski would bring down a president, but it didn’t, so I’m surprised that you think a comedian’s picture of a performer — Playboy model who goes on Hannity, who voted Trump — You know, I see some politics there, but I haven’t brought that up every step of the way because of course in this #MeToo environment, you must always just believe the women. And I think that there’s a lot of reasons why we need to look at the women seriously and believe them, and in many cases — like, for example, I spoke to accusers in Mark Halperin, which he admits a lot of what he’s accused of doing. I spoke to them, I believe them. I’m just wondering if all women need to be believed. And I’m concerned that we are being the judge, the jury, and the cops here, and so did Senate Democrats, getting ahead of their skis, and trust me, Kirsten Gillibrand, I want you to run for president, but you gotta keep it real.

[…]

In my opinion — just my opinion — I feel like we’ve got a machine gun now, and we’re just going around the room with every man that perhaps we don’t like politically. I don’t know.

(“I’m worried for women,” she said. “I’m concerned about women who are legitimately sexually harassed in the workplace across America, and where this is taking us.” Aw, thanks, Mik. You’re a gem.)

Bite. My. Ass.

This shit — this precise shit — is why women don’t come forward. Leigh Corfman, Roy Moore’s first accuser, said that she didn’t come forward in the past 40 years because “there is no one here that doesn’t know that [she’s] not an angel.” That a woman has posed nude for magazines makes her no less credible as a victim of sexual assault. In fact, women in that kind of industry are frequently the target of abuse because the abuser knows the woman’s accusations could just be hand-waved — Who’s going to believe you, honey?

But you have to suspect that the “voted for Trump” part was just as offensive to Brzezinski as the “Playboy model” part, because she sees “some politics there,” which is code for “Tweeden opposes Franken politically and thus her only possible motivation can be to smear a good man.”

“I believe women” doesn’t mean automatically rolling out the guillotine for every man who’s accused of sexual assault. But it does mean taking women seriously and listening to their allegations instead of just immediately looking for a reason to discredit them. A reason like their history as a nude model, for instance. Or the fact that their politics disagree with yours. It’s easy to say, “It’s a conspiracy, and she’s just trying to take down a good man, and she’s probably getting paid for it, too” — so easy that Roy Moore’s apologists are saying it in Alabama right this second. But nude models can be assaulted. Republicans can be assaulted. And even if — even if, and I’ve seen no evidence that this is the case — Leeann Tweeden really was being paid by Roger Stone the whole time, that doesn’t negate the possibility that Al Franken really did force his tongue down her throat as she protested. “I believe women” means that we have to take her accusations seriously.

“I’m just wondering if all women need to be believed.” Yes, Mika. Even the ones you don’t like.

Brzezinski’s problem isn’t that people are going around the room taking down “every man that perhaps we don’t like politically.” Her problem is that they’ve taken down a man that she does like politically, and she’s happy to throw a woman under the bus — a woman who comes with plausible accusations and photographic evidence — if it means defending her guy. That is gross and wrong and insulting to all of the women currently being dragged through the mud for speaking out against powerful, abusive men. She owes those women an apology. And it damned well better be better than Franken’s.

Quick Hit: TIME’s 2017 Person of the Year is women who speak out

A photo montage of women featured in TIME magazine's 2017 "Person of the Year" issue, all of whom spoke out about sexual harassment and assault
The Silence Breakers

TIME magazine has announced their Person of the Year, and it’s actually People: the silence breakers who have come forward about the sexual harassment and assault they’ve experienced — as TIME calls them, “the voices that launched a movement.”

The cover of the print edition features Ashley Judd and Taylor Swift, along with strawberry picker using the pseudonym Isabel Pascual, Oregon Senator Sara Gelser, and corporate lobbyist Adama Iwu, as well as the elbow of a hospital worker who still fears the repercussions of identifying herself.

There has been discussion about the inclusion of Taylor Swift, who hasn’t played a major role in the #MeToo movement and only spoke out when it happened to her. Many have suggested women like Kesha, whose career was severely damaged by her accusations, or longtime activists like Gabrielle Union or Tarana Burke, who started the #MeToo hashtag to address sexual assault 10 years ago and was featured in the TIME article.

The digital edition highlights, in interviews and a video, those women and many more women and men, from a variety of backgrounds and with a variety of stories: Actresses Alyssa Milano, Selma Blair, and Rose McGowan. Actor Terry Crews. Former hotel housekeeper Juana Melara. The group of hospitality workers suing the Plaza Hotel for sexual harassment and assault. Several university professors. Former dishwasher Sandra Pezqueda. Movie director Blaise Godbe Lipman. Former FOX contributor Wendy Walsh. Food blog editor Lindsey Reynolds. Entrepreneur Lindsay Meyer. Journalists Sandra Muller and Megyn Kelly. Former Uber engineer Susan Fowler. Art curator Amanda Schmitt. And an anonymous former office assistant. Each has their own story to tell and their own reason for coming forward — and they’re a reminder that it’s a problem that isn’t limited to sexy, high-profile industries — but they’re all brave for doing so.

This doesn’t mean, of course, that women who don’t come forward with their abuse aren’t also honorable — they have the right to do what they feel is best for their life, livelihood, and safety. But TIME’s silence breakers have, hopefully, made it possible for those women to come forward safely and without fear. This honor is well deserved and, sadly, hard earned.

The lighter side of sexual harassment

Cecily Strong, Saoirse Ronan, Kate McKinnon, Aidy Bryant, and Leslie Jones pose as pop princess in a music video about sexual harassment
This been the damn world.

(Is there a lighter side? Eh, why not.) The women of Saturday Night Live bring us a scathing bubblegum pop anthem letting those men bewildered by the recent sexual harassment allegations know that WOMEN LIVE IN A HELL OF MEN WHO CAN’T KEEP THEIR HANDS OR THEIR LIBIDOS TO THEMSELVES, AND NOW YOU’RE INVITED.

Now House of Cards is ruined, and that really sucks. Well, here’s a list of stuff that’s ruined for us.

Incidentally, it looks like House of Cards might actually not be ruined, because it looks like Netflix is ditching Kevin Spacey and moving forward with the show with Robin Wright in the lead. Looks like the whole “ditching predatory men and replacing them with women” might be working just fine.

What men need to know about discussing sexual harassment

A shot from Game of Thrones with Arya and Sansa Stark standing on the snow-frosted battlements of Winterfell
Grab your parkas, dudes, ’cause winter is coming.

I was talking with a group of guy friends recently, the sole woman amid a collection of dudes as they stream-of-consciousness workshopped their way to understanding the ongoing storm of sexual harassment accusations. It’s not a pleasant position to be in — I was glad to be able to help them understand things, but thinking about that stuff at that level and having to articulate it that way was exhausting and also made me want to go home and take, like, twelve showers. But they and others have asked what they need to know and what insights they need to have when discussing sexual harassment with women. So here’s some.

I do have to note — and Aforementioned Guy Friends, on the off chance you’re reading this, I am not trying to call you out specifically, just observing a phenomenon — the number of things they didn’t ask about, on top of the things they did. The number of things they didn’t ask for clarification about, because they thought they already understood. I watched their eyes get big as I explained that getting hit on by a persistent guy in a bar isn’t just annoying — there’s often a sense of danger involved. If I put him down hard, is he going to get angry, and if he does, will get get violent? If I let him down easy, is he going to leave me alone? How many drinks are there between “being rude” and “leading him on”? And if I do agree to have one drink with him, just to get him to leave me alone, and he ends up raping me, how blamed am I going to be for it? (Answer: Very blamed.) Most guys, being good guys, can’t imagine doing physical harm to a woman, and thus can’t figure out why we’d be worried for our safety around guys. It’s hard for them to grasp that our objection to being harassed on the street or harangued at a bar goes beyond mere annoyance.

That’s one reason I think that sexual harassment in the workplace has become such a focus of late, even though both it and social harassment have been around since time immemorial: because both men and women know what it’s like to be vulnerable professionally. A man might not know what it’s like to fear for his safety as he goes about his everyday life. But he knows what it’s like to worry about the security of his job, and so while he might think women are being hyperbolic when we talk about fears of physical attack, he can understand “I didn’t say anything because I was afraid I’d lose my job.” He might not sympathize with a woman who thought she’d be raped by Harvey Weinstein, but he can sympathize with one who thought she’d be fired by him, and so here we are.

Vulnerability

Of course, even in the workplace, women are, as a whole, still more vulnerable than men. Women in general make 80 cents on the white male dollar — and it’s just 63 cents for black women, and 54 cents for Latina women. We’re statistically less likely to be sitting in the corner office and more likely to be answering to the white dude who is. We’re less likely to be directing or producing the movie and more likely to be fetching coffee for the white dude who is. And we’re more likely to be willing to take a deep breath and put up with a lot of abuse for the sake of simply holding our ground in industries with support structures built for the sake of putting and keeping those white dudes in power.

If you’re a single parent, you don’t have the power to just walk out on an abusive boss without a job lined up. If you have a disability and rely on your job for healthcare, you can’t just walk out. If you work in the service industry and know that there’s a line of yous waiting to put food on their own family’s table, and the guy whose drink you bring or house you clean or kid you watch decides to put his hands on you, you have a choice to make, and if you choose hold your breath and hope he doesn’t do it again tomorrow, because both of the kids need new shoes, that’s your call to make. And the only wrong person there is the one who uses his power to victimize people who depend on him for their livelihood.

Standing together, and a little bit of marine wildlife

The women who choose to stay at a job with an abusive boss, who support each other and act as a node in a whisper network but never stand up and speak out, aren’t betraying anyone or enabling anyone — they’re doing what they feel they have to do to survive. The ones who do speak up? They’re GD heroes. Because for every Rose McGowan, there’s a Dana Min Goodman and Julia Wolov, whose comedy careers were waylaid after they spoke up about Louis CK masturbating in front of them in 2002. Or a Barbara Bowman, whose acting career dried up after she told her agent and a lawyer that Bill Cosby drugged and raped her in 1985. Pushing back, speaking up, exerting any sort of agency in the face of sexual harassment is risky, and it takes a lot of courage to be the first voice that gives strength to the rest.

And that’s how it works — the reason this is all coming to light now is that women are hearing other women speak up. Four women spoke up about Roy Moore, then five, then eight, and now nine, because they knew that while they’d be putting themselves in the line of fire in doing so, they wouldn’t be doing it alone. One woman spoke up about Bill Cosby, and soon it was 60 — not because they were inspired to make up stories or pile on, but because they’d felt isolated for so long and now had other women’s courage to borrow from. They weren’t safe, doing what they did, but doing it together, they were strong.

And that’s the difference between being protected and not being vulnerable — swimming in a shark cage, or being a shark.

Vulnerability sucks

Men are still on the hook to protect women to some degree. I hate it, and it’s freaking 2017, but that’s just the case. Men have to listen to women and to hold each other accountable to the rules — until there are women in the C-suite to do it, the men who are currently there will have to. As long as the Good Ol’ Boys Network is still 93.6 percent boys, they’re the ones who can make sure these offenses aren’t ignored or excused.

And it sucks to acknowledge that. Feminists and womanists have done so much for so long that sometimes it feels almost ungrateful to acknowledge that we’re still vulnerable. Women are doing better and better over time — our representation is increasing in business, government, and the media. We’re making exceptional accomplishments in male-dominated fields. (Did y’all see Wonder Woman? Because that was pretty awesome. It’s easy to come away from that movie feeling completely invulnerable.)

But we’re not invulnerable. For all the strides that have been made, women in the U.S. remain, on average, physically smaller and with less social capital than men. Until we have equal representation in those fields — and with it, the influence and authority to handle this shit on our own — we need men to, at the very least, call out your boys (on a social and a professional basis) when they do stuff that isn’t okay and hold them to account.

Make no mistake: If you’re not gonna, we’ll do it our damn selves. We’re smart and resourceful and used to getting things done. Current events are demonstrating that women are feeling more confident in standing together in the face of threats and amassing around us a degree of sharkness. But if, as a man, you’re going to make noises about caring now, while the subject is in the news, you’ll be expected to follow through in the long term. (And let’s not kid ourselves that this isn’t going to die down once the public becomes inured to seeing powerful men be exposed as predators — mass shootings what? Gun control who? Mental health huh?)

Answer the damn question already

So what can men do? The biggest thing is to not undermine us. That’s what “believe women” is about — it doesn’t mean immediately shooting a man twice in the forehead the moment a woman accuses him of sexual harassment, but it does mean taking accusations seriously and not immediately dismissing them as jealousy, morning-after regret, histrionics, or flat-out lying. Men launch personal attacks on sexual harassment accusers — Leigh Corfman once got a ticket for driving a boat without lights on! That means she’s a liar! — because they have nothing substantive to say about the accusations. When they see women standing together, they have to declare it a conspiracy, because the thought that they’re all telling the truth is far too damning. And that’s the kind of thing that makes women afraid to come forward in the first place, alone or together. Instead of reflexively looking for reasons to discredit women, just listen to their story.

Don’t try to fit our experiences into the frame of your life. Trying to empathize with us is good. Dismissing our feelings and experiences because they don’t track with yours isn’t. Think you wouldn’t be bothered by something? Be scared by something? Think you’d find something flattering? (Fun fact: You wouldn’t. Not if you were there.) That doesn’t mean it works that way for most women — see above in re: guys having no idea what it’s really like for a woman to get hit on in a bar. (Also, don’t try to argue with our lived experience based on the word of one chick whose name you don’t remember who says she actually does find it flattering. We’re sitting in front of you. If you choose to completely discard what we’re telling you, at least have the good grace to not tell us about it.)

Know that it goes beyond what’s currently in the news. Right now, we’re seeing it mostly in entertainment and government, but it happens in every industry, and a lot of them will probably never get voracious news coverage. Blue collar and pink collar jobs. Service jobs. And women with compounding oppressions — women of color, lesbians, trans women, women with disabilities — who so frequently get ignored or further punished when they speak out about offenses against them. And, yeah men. This isn’t just a rich, famous white people thing. It might be happening right now at your place of employment. Just ask some of your female coworkers — you might be the first guy ever to do so.

And the other big thing is to let women speak for ourselves. Instead of speaking over us or trying to tell our stories for us, signal boost us. Share your platform with us. Support us in supporting each other. We’re not sharks yet, as is evidenced by the fact that decade-old sexual harassment offenses are only coming out now. But we’re getting there. It’ll happen eventually, one way or another, and it’ll be better for everyone when it does.

Quick Hit: Trump fails to not be racist as he “honors” Native American code talkers

Donald Trump stands in the Oval Office, in front of a portrait of Andrew Jackson, with two Navajo code talkers for a ceremony honoring them on Monday, November 28, 2017.
That’s a portrait of Andrew “Indian Killer” Jackson in the background. If you’re into art. (Photo credit: White House)

On Monday, Donald Trump once again gave it the ol’ college try to not be racist at a special event. He failed, because he is constitutionally unable to not be a racist asshole any time he stands in front of people without a script.

The event was to honor World War II Native American code talkers, and it’s the kind of ceremony that should be an easy win for any politician with a soul. However.

The ceremony was set up in front of Trump’s favorite portrait of Andrew Jackson, a man nicknamed “Indian Killer” for the tens of thousands of Native Americans who died as a result of his Indian Removal Act. So that was cool. And then Trump felt the need to interrupt his praise of the code talkers with an out-of-context attack on… whatever, I don’t even know anymore.

“I just want to thank you because you’re very, very special people,” Trump said Monday afternoon, speaking to a small group of code talkers. “You were here long before any of us were here. Although we have a representative in Congress who, they say, was here a long time ago. They call her ‘Pocahontas.'”

[…]

On Monday, after the Pocahontas quip, Trump put his hand on one of the Navajo guests and said: “But you know what, I like you because you are special. You are special people.”

(Dude, “they” don’t call her that. You call her that.) “Pocahontas” is the name Trump uses for Sen. Elizabeth Warren because of her (dubious) claims of Native American ancestry. He’s referring, of course, to the actual Pocahontas, a teenaged girl who had to give up her infant daughter when she was kidnapped for ransom and raped by the English (who also killed her husband), who forced her to marry John Rolfe, convert to Christianity, and change her name and then dragged her to England and possibly murdered her. And then her father died of grief. So, you know, some lighthearted Disney shit, and definitely someone to be thrown around as an insult.

Curiously enough, the code talkers in attendance didn’t crack right the hell up at his clever comment, and the NCAI later responded:

“We regret that the President’s use of the name Pocahontas as a slur to insult a political adversary is overshadowing the true purpose of today’s White House ceremony,” stated NCAI President Jefferson Keel, a decorated U.S. Army officer and Vietnam War combat veteran. “Today was about recognizing the remarkable courage and invaluable contributions of our Native code talkers. That’s who we honor today and everyday — the three code talkers present at the White House representing the 10 other elderly living code talkers who were unable to join them, and the hundreds of other code talkers from the Cherokee, Choctaw, Comanche, Lakota, Meskwaki, Mohawk, Navajo, Tlingit, and other tribes who served during World Wars I and II.”

In response to an earlier use of the name by Trump, they released a statement saying, “The name of Pocahontas should not be used as a slur, and it is inappropriate for anyone to use her name in a disparaging manner.”

Because We Need It: Let It Go

Not because we need to let it go — we’re under no requirement to let anything go that we don’t want to, so there. But our president is an infant, and Alabama is preparing to put a monster in the U.S. Senate, and parts of Puerto Rico still don’t have water, but you know what? The snow-throwing effects here are great, and the costume change is even cooler, and the girls are adorable, and the acting isn’t half bad, either.

Even if I were followed around by small, ingenious children throwing streamers, I wouldn’t be that cool, but at least I could pretend.

Why Women Don’t Come Forward

Berklee College of Music students march in response to sexual assault allegations against Berkless professors on November 13, 2017
They’re reporting now because the support is there — for the first time ever. (Photo credit Haley Lerner/Berklee Daily Free Press)

[Content note: sexual assault]

Supporters desperate to defend Roy Moore against accusations of child molestation and predation — and justify their decision to vote for him despite said accusations — love to try to discredit his accusers by asking why they didn’t come forward 40 years ago, when the offenses allegedly occurred. It’s a bullshit argument — when you can’t realistically say, “He didn’t do it,” your only refuge is, “The accusations are politically motivated” — but you know what? I’ll play.

Why are the women only coming forward now?

1. The four women the Washington Post originally talked to said they hadn’t planned on going public at all, ever — they were ashamed of what happened, and they were (rightly) afraid of how the public would treat them, and they just wanted to move on with their lives. They only came forward because the Post reporter sought them out and convinced them to speak out, and they decided there was too much at stake to stay quiet.

2. The women who have come forward since then (and there are, what, eight of them now?) said they only found the courage to come forward now because they no longer felt so alone and afraid.

3. The accusations didn’t come out during Moore’s previous, statewide campaigns because the national press didn’t take interest in his previous, statewide campaigns. (See above in re: The women only came forward because the Post reporter convinced them to.)

4. The accusations came out a month before the election because the Post article — which was originally supposed to be a simple profile of Moore’s local supporters, and not a three-week, 30-source report-a-thon — wasn’t finished until a month before the election. (The paper had been covering Moore since before the primary, and the article about his supporters was just another part of that. Had the rumors of Moore’s abusive behavior been uncovered earlier, it’s safe to say they would have been reported earlier.)

That’s why the women are coming forward now, and not 40 years ago, and not months ago, and not during Moore’s previous elections. Y’all’s attempt to discredit the women is invalid. Find a new argument.

But why did they not want to come forward in the first place?

They didn’t want to come forward because the world is a dick to victims of sexual assault.

They’re ashamed.

In the Washington Post, Leigh Corfman, who accused Moore of molesting her when she was 14 and he was 32, said that she felt such shame after her abuse — “I felt I was responsible. I thought I was bad” — that she only told two of her closest friends that anything had happened. She later abused drugs and alcohol and even attempted suicide because of the emotional impact of the attack.

With victim-blaming and slut-shaming as rampant as they are, assault victims who don’t fit the “ideal victim” profile are often afraid to come forward because they’ve internalized the blame for their attack. A woman who was date raped after she was drinking, or who went voluntarily to the home of the person who attacked her, or who froze and didn’t put up a fight, or who had been intimate with her attacker in the past, might believe that it wasn’t rape because it was all her fault — or could believe that there’s no point in coming forward, because it would just be blamed on her regardless.

Their abuser was powerful, beloved, or influential.

Beverly Young Nelson accused Moore of attacking her in his car when she was 16. She said that before he kicked her out his car, he said, “You’re just a child, and I am the district attorney of Etowah County, and if you tell anyone about this, no one will ever believe you.” The power differential between a well-respected public official and a 16-year-old is enough to scare any girl into silence. What teenage girl is going to have the courage to come forward with an accusation after a warning like that? It took her four years to be able to tell anyone at all.

It was that same kind of power that kept Harvey Weinstein’s and Louis CK’s accusers from speaking out before they did. Even as their misconduct was an open secret in their industries, no one was willing to speak up — neither the accusers, nor anyone else who knew about it. Weinstein’s offenses were the subject of jokes, and CK’s offenses were the subject of his own jokes, and no one ever came out and said that that shit was not funny. Because Do you know who I am?

And if the attacker is a family member, it can be even worse.

They’re afraid of the consequences.

Terry Crews said that when he was assaulted by a high-level Hollywood executive, he didn’t speak up because he was afraid of being ostracized in his industry. He would lose his livelihood. It’s hard to imagine a man as big and strong as Crews being afraid of anything, but as he said on Twitter:

They’re also frequently afraid (and with good reason) of public attacks. Corfman acknowledged in the Post article that with her history of multiple bankruptcies and multiple divorces — “There is no one here that doesn’t know that I’m no angel,” she said — she expected that the media would dredge up her past to try to discredit her. Tina Johnson, Moore’s most recent accuser, similarly said that she’s pled guilty to several misdemeanors in the past and is afraid of public censure — but that it’s important enough to speak out anyway.

“I’m not perfect,” she said. I have things in my background and I know (the public) will jump on anything, but (what happened with Moore) is still the truth, and the truth will stand when the world won’t.”

“I’m not perfect.” “I’m no angel.” But a person shouldn’t have to be a perfect angel to be respected as a victim of sexual assault.

They do come forward, and they get ignored or further victimized.

… like what’s happening now to Moore’s accusers — like Corfman, whose past is, as she predicted, being dragged up, dirtied up, and passed around to discredit her. Since Leeann Tweeden accused Al Franken of sexually harassing and assaulting her on a USO tour — offenses to which he has admitted — her past as a Playboy Playmate has been brought up, as if displaying one’s body on one’s own terms is an invitation for assault. And they’ve brought up the fact that the kiss in the sketch was consensual, as if a scripted peck on the lips is an invitation for him to shove his tongue down her throat without her consent. Any assault victim watching what’s being done to her would be completely justified in being scared into silence.

And then there are the authorities who are more loyal to the accused than to anyone else. This is frequently seen with college athletes, where accusers are ignored, disbelieved, and/or pressured to drop accusations because You don’t want to ruin a good boy’s whole life, do you? They’re subjected to interrogation as if they themselves were accused of a crime — What were you wearing? How much did you drink? Why were you still in contact with him afterward? How many people have you slept with? Hadn’t you slept with him before? It was probably consensual and you just regretted it afterward. You’re just ashamed of being a slut. You’re going to ruin a good boy’s life. And, of course, Why didn’t you come forward before now?

But that kind of abuse can happen to anyone, accusing anyone — anyone who has friends who don’t believe he could do something like that, or authority figures who don’t want to deal with it, or governors who believe you’re telling the truth but are going to support your attacker anyway because at least he’s not a Democrat.

As Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Roy Moore himself questioned the application of Alabama’s rape shield law that prevented defendants from bringing up the alleged victim’s sexual history — on a case where a man was accused of raping a 12-year-old. And another case where a man was accused of raping two 15-year-olds at an alternative school. When the price of speaking out is being victimized all over again, women stay silent.

Women don’t come forward because the world is a dick to victims of sexual assault.

When they come forward right away, they’re shamed, blamed, attacked, and ostracized. When they come forward later, they’re accused of betraying other women and abetting the attackers by not wanting to step out onto the firing line. Women don’t come forward because everything about our society wants to punish them for doing so. The question shouldn’t be, “Why don’t women come forward?” It should be, “Why would a woman ever want to?”