In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

Anti-Choice Terrorists Claim First Amendment Rights

robertfergusonpic1.jpg
Anti-choice activist Robert Ferguson

Gotta love the anti-choice nuts at Operation Rescue. The backstory: They’re going after Dr. Tiller, a Kansas abortion provider, for approximately the 340,986th time. Dr. Tiller is a favorite of theirs because he’s one of the last abortion providers in Kansas, and he provides late-term abortions. One of their followers shot him in both arms a few years ago, his clinic has been vandalized on numerous occasions, his workers are regularly harassed, and he’s Target #1 for a “pro-life” movement that murders doctors. Tiller’s home address, family members’ information, and pictures are all posted on “pro-life” websites. For protection, he lives in a gated community, has a high-level security system surrounding his home, and wears a bullet-proof vest to work every day.

Operation Rescue and other anti-choice groups harass Tiller constantly — in person and in court. They stalk his employees, sifting through their trash and encouraging local businesses (like their dry-cleaner or their mechanic) not to service “baby-killers.” They picket his clinic. They put up heinous websites about him — I don’t recommend googling “Dr. Tiller,” but if you do, you’ll see what kinds of websites I’m talking about. They sue him. They also attempt to bring criminal charges against him. Usually, those charges are so flimsy that they don’t make it past a grand jury; they are, however, expensive and time-consuming for Dr. Tiller, which is the point.

I would encourage everyone to read this article about anti-choice harassment and stalking in Wichita to get a fuller idea of what’s going on out there. It’s a must-read piece, and if you haven’t seen it yet, give it a look.

The latest harassment of Dr. Tiller includes yet another criminal charge for which there is very little evidence. Operation Rescue, however, has decided that it’s important for them to subpoena the private medical records of women who have had abortions in Dr. Tiller’s clinic, and to show the Grand Jury photographs (taken by Operation Rescue, natch) of the women walking into the clinic — and don’t worry, they’ve already posted those photos online anyway. They claim that no privacy rights are violated because the women’s faces are blurred in the photos, and identifying information will be redacted from the records.

All of which, as we know, is crap. But here’s where it gets (unintentionally) funny: They have a press release running in Christian “news” sources this week, complaining that an editorial and a political cartoon in a Kansas paper are unfairly compromising the Grand Jury’s work. The anti-Operation-Rescue editorial reads, in part:

A hunt through women’s medical records soon could begin at the Sedgwick County Courthouse — one set in motion by a petition, paid for by tax dollars and sanctioned Wednesday by a judge. That should bother Kansans on both sides of the abortion issue.
[…]
Of course, many anti-Tiller crusaders can live with that, especially if, in their view, it saves a baby’s life. They consider the harassment and intimidation of women, as well as of Tiller and other providers, as the necessary means to ending abortion.

Speaking of harassment — it was not reassuring to learn this week that Troy Newman of Operation Rescue had testified before the grand jury, suggested it acquire four years of Tiller’s records and even provided it with pictures of women entering Tiller’s clinic who were in what he believed were the late stages of pregnancy. It was bad enough that Operation Rescue has taken such photographs and posted them online.

If the grand jury wants to be fair and impartial in its work, it should be wary of Newman, his fringe group and its harassing and often tasteless tactics.

All reasonable enough. Here’s the cartoon:

main-1.jpg

So here’s the slightly amusing part: Operation Rescue responds by whining that what they do is within their First Amendment rights, and it isn’t harassment; the newspaper’s decision to print opinions, however, is impeding the Grand Jury. I think someone forgot to read the full text of the First Amendment:

“This attack was a shameless attempt to influence the grand jury via the editorial pages of the local newspaper with ad hominem attacks and inaccurate information,” said Operation Rescue spokesperson Cheryl Sullenger.
[…]
“Privacy arguments are red herrings. A serious investigation into criminal abortions is being conducted and the grand jury is legally entitled to whatever evidence they require. Lives are at stake here. All due effort is being taken to protect the privacy of women, but you can’t excuse criminal conduct by claiming in was done under a cloak of privacy,” said Sullenger.

Addressing Homan’s accusation that OR tactics are harassing, Sullenger responded, “The last time I checked, exercising the First Amendment was not considered harassment, despite Holman’s inflammatory rhetoric. Holman would rather that viable-baby abortions illegally continue than face the truth that Tiller may be violating the law. This reveals a militant support for illegal post-viability abortions, which is a startlingly radical position for an editorial board to take.”

“As much as they want to shift the focus from Tiller’s alleged criminal late-term abortion ring, the truth will win out. Let the grand jury conduct their investigation unimpeded and let justice prevail,” said Sullenger.

So… a well-reasoned and brief editorial in a city newspaper is a “shameless attack,” but screaming at women entering clinics, taking their pictures and posting them online, stalking clinic employees as part of a campaign called “Nowhere to Hide” and conspiring to blow up abortion clinics is totally fair game?

Of course, I’m surely just being hyperbolic when I accuse Operation Rescue spokespeople of actual violence, right? I mean, they bill themselves as one of the largest and most influential pro-life groups in the country, and surely they would at least want to pretend that there’s some space between them and the crazies who murder people and set buildings on fire, right?

Sadly, no. Cheryl Sullenger, Operation Rescue spokeswoman, Senior Policy Advisor and co-author of this press release, spent a few years in jail for conspiring to blow up the Alvarado Medical Center in San Diego, California. She was also one of the creators of the Nowhere to Hide anti-choice tactic, wherein anti-choice activists stalked and harassed clinic workers in their homes and their communities.

Operation Rescue has always been one of the more crazy-embracing anti-choice groups — even if it is highly influential, and even if its leaders are warmly accepted by the mainstream “pro-life” movement. But Sullenger’s conservative connections aren’t just to anti-choice and fringe organizations — she served on Central Committee of the 75th District of the San Diego Republican Party.

And Troy Newman, the other author of the press release, isn’t exactly a marginalized figure either, no matter how seedy he is. More about him (and other anti-choice terrorists) here.

These are not fringe organizations and these are not marginalized people, no matter how much the mainstream anti-choice or conservative movements try to paint them that way when they succeed in murdering people and blowing up buildings. They are embraced on every level of the organized “pro-life” movement and the Republican party.

Their views — from their anti-contraception, anti-sex stance to their promotion of violence and murder — are radically out of touch with most Americans, including most self-identified pro-life Americans. But they’re entirely in line with the mainstream “pro-life” movement.

It’s also worth mentioning that they stalk and harass not only abortion providers, but anyone who they claim is an “abortion collaborator.” The term “collaborator” is used rather loosely — they list anyone who has any contact whatsoever with abortion providers, and they call on their insane followers (who have been known to commit acts of violence in the name of “life”) to “take action” in response. Feel free to peruse the list of “collaborators” yourself — it includes the people who do Dr. Tiller’s dry cleaning, the pharmacy where Dr. Tiller fills his personal prescriptions, the copy shop he uses, his air conditioner repair person, his local coffee shop and bakery, and charities that have accepted his donations. Here’s that Operation Rescue tells their followers to do with the list:

It is important to note that this is not a boycott list. It is something more. Certainly, some will be compelled by conscience to refrain from doing business with abortion collaborators, and that is acceptable and even welcome. However, others may be moved to contact the businesses on the list and witness of Christ to them. That, of course, is also the duty of Christians. Others may want to attempt to educate them on the evils of abortion and the sanctity of human life. There would certainly be benefit in that endeavor since undoubtedly some on the list have not fully considered the ramifications of their business dealings on the pre-born.

However one is touched by this information, we pray that it will prick the conscience of our society and be used to hasten the day when pre-born children are no longer treated as a commodity that has the potential for profit, but are instead valued and protected.

“And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.”
-Ephesians 5:11

Five comments in, the late Operation Rescue pal Robert Ferguson — who promoted the murder of abortion providers — says:

Baby killers like Tiller should be ostracized by a moral society. Their blood money should be unacceptable and their patronage refused.

The life of a baby killer should be one of utter hell in trying to find a place to lay his head or to sit down to rest. There should be no such place found.

It’s remarkable that there are some who claim to oppose abortion yet cannot see how in accepting Tiller’s blood money that they offer aid and comfort to the enemy.

Businesses and individuals who aid and comfort the enemy are traitors. Those who support these traitors are also traitors. Any involvement in baby killing should come with a great and unacceptable cost.

You just make it acceptable to kill children when you treat a baby killer like Tiller “like any other customer”

He’s also one of Army of God’s “Heroes of the Faith” (warning: fake bloody fetus pictures). Army of God, for the unfamiliar, is a militant anti-choice group that makes no effort to hide the fact that they promote murder and terrorism. They’re the ones with the infamous list of abortion providers’ names and addresses — and they draw a big red line through the names of doctors who have been murdered.

The very next comment quotes Paul Hill, an anti-choice terrorist who murdered two people.

But Operation Rescue and Army of God haven’t been going after Dr. Tiller alone. No, former Kansas Attorney General — and current county District Attorney — Phill Kline used taxpayer dollars to join the Tiller witch-hunt. And not only was Kline in line with Operation Rescue and Army of God’s goals, he appointed one of their own as a special prosecutor in the Tiller case — Don McKinney, a man who has been unapologetic about his ties with the Army of God and other anti-choice terrorist organizations. McKinney was dropped from his Special Prosecutor position when Kline lost re-election, much to the chagrin of the anti-choice terrorist set. Interesting, though, is the fact that McKinney’s brother Dennis is the Kansas State House Minority Leader. And a Democrat.

Feeling sick yet?


21 thoughts on Anti-Choice Terrorists Claim First Amendment Rights

  1. Ugh. Disgusting. Terrorists, that’s all they are. At least our crazy anti-abortion/anti-choice people are quiet. Very, very quiet. The last time I heard anything of restricting abortion from anywhere was from the Christian party wanting to cut down on the number of weeks during which abortion was allowed. One interview, and nothing more. And that was… huh, last year?? the year before that? Damn, I don’t remember. Quiet. If that “if I pretend they don’t exist they won’t” only worked…

  2. Maybe it’s time for women and those who love freedom to fight back against the terrorists. Give them back everything they’ve given in full measure. If they insist on waging war against women, they deserve war in return.

  3. I think the sign needs a bit of changing. How about, “whatever force is legitimate to defend the life of a born child is legitimate to defend the life of a pregnant woman”? If they are blocking a clinic entrance and a woman who has to have an abortion before she starts cancer treatment or due to some complication of pregnancy, it’s ok to use deadly force against these yahoos in order to defend the life of the woman.

    I am sick and tired of these people who think they can hold signs, etc., and not have responsibility for their views. Free speech is one thing, but Jesus (whom they claim to worship) said specifically “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”.

    These people would have woman carry babies to term no matter what? Then they should, as a show of good faith, wear those pregnancy simulator thingies 24/7 for 9 months … and have to figure out how to pay for bills because their employer doesn’t fully comply with family leave requirements, etc. A woman dies in childbirth? Well, is one of them willing to die? I think not …

    These people are not (just) terrorists: they are moral chickenhawks willing to tell other people what to do but, by and large, I don’t see them volunteering to walk much in the shoes of a pregnant woman who is pregnant under, shall we say, less than ideal circumstances (good economic situation, good health, plenty of support from friends and/or family, etc.). I’m no Christian, but I seem to remember Jesus, whom they worship as God, having a few particular words to say about moral chickenhawks.

    I guess if you say “Jesus is God”, you can safely ignore his human message?

  4. I still don’t get how this shit is *legal*. It’s harrassment, plain and simple, and yet it’s legal. But I guess because they’re on public property, it’s A-OK. I gotta tell ya, i’m not a violent person, but if someone approached me in say, Starbucks, and said something to me, they’d be pretty damn lucky just to get a face full of really hot coffee.

  5. Family leave requirements just require your employer to give you time off without pay.

    How you’re supposed to do that, and have and raise a kid – well that’s YOUR problem, should have kept your legs closed!

  6. But you don’t understand! These are good, white Christians, living in the Free World! All they’re doing is protecting the lives of innocent babies! They can’t *possibly* be terrorists! Right?

    Ugh…and I’m reading this after an onslaught of anti-choice lunacy, both on campus and in the local papers. People in the Student centre with displays saying “I Regret My Abortion” (and pamphlets explaining how one essentially should regret their abortion), seminars featuring women whose lives have been “changed” by abortion, and talks about how abortion harms women…then idiotic letters in the paper that all more or less amount to “fetus = innocent widdle bayyybeeeee” and “pregnant woman = evil slut”. Even though I live in Canada, I’m in one of the most conservative parts, where many of the right-wing loons are concentrated and arrg….I want out!!!

  7. Sorry…first part of the comment should have included the *sarc* at the end. Just in case anyone thinks I actually believe that…

  8. I don’t understand these people and I was raised to believe like them.

    Why are women reduced to nothing more than Baby Buckets?

  9. Re: “Whatever force is legitimate . . .”

    Since when is forcing another person to protect a child, a legitimate means of protecting it?

    Always, always, always, this endless repeat of “don’t kill it” as if that’s all it involves—but they’re not really doing any protecting, they’re just preventing other people from not protecting, not sustaining.

    Do Child Protection Services drop off small toddlers at random people’s houses and say, here, take care of them, make sure their mother’s abusive ex-boyfriend doesn’t break in and kill them? Do people get grabbed off the street, directed to a burning building, and ordered to go in and get the kid in the second bedroom? Can you get plucked up from dinner, the interstate, from watching the Super Bowl, because somebody else has decided that THEY want something, and therefore YOU, a random stranger, are responsible for getting it for them?

    If that’s acceptable, on the other hand, I’d like a Lamborghini. The protestor who came up with that sign can buy it for me.

  10. My sister came up with a good strategy: every time you read a story like this, donate some money to a pro-choice cause (shameless plug: we like the Lilith Fund, which helps underprivileged women and girls in Texas find and pay for abortions… it’s almost impossible to get a late-term abortion there, so they re-route those women to Tiller’s clinic).

    This stuff is absolutely mind-boggling. I mean, seriously??

  11. I agree with LeggoMyMeggo. Donate a portion of your rebate check to Dr. Tiller.
    Over the summer I was reading something about harassment/violence towards Dr. Tiller over on Feministing (I think). I sent him a check and a note thanking him and his staff for their important work. A few days later I received a hand-written card from the doctor, thanking me for brightening his day and letting me know that the money I’d sent would go towards repairing a window someone had recently broken at his clinic. It made me feel really good. They can use all the help they can get. Actually, if you are interested in making contributions, ProKanDo is the name of his PAC.

  12. I know I’m not terribly welcome here, but it never kept me from living at home.

    Operation Rescue assholes should be hounded by scary people who spray them with spit while screaming about their legal rights–oh, wait a minute, they would probably deem that to be harassment or verbal assault. The sad part is some Godoped judge would certainly side with them. Man, has this country slid into the morass.

    Remember to floss after you brush and to flush after you Bush.

  13. Awww that is so sweet SarahMC. Makes me wish i had some money to donate. I really think Dr.Tiller (yes, dear antis he is a real doctor) deserves a medal for not giving up and risking his life for the sake of women who choose abortion for whatever reason.
    I hope that when the elections are over the USA will finally get a president who will smack some sense into these people. These BORN people. Also I seriously doubt the Founding Fathers included this idiodicy when they were thinking up the First Amendment. And it is just insulting to think otherwise.

    Also if they want War then I have no qualms over killing them. You cannot be “pro-life” and then turn around and ruin/take the lives of countless people, their families, their coworkers etc. But that’s just me. I doubt many people would agree.

  14. seriously, though, what do you DO? why -isn’t- picketing, harassing and defaming private citizens illegal?

  15. These “pro-life” terrorist groups are dangerous. I don’t think people take these pro-life terrorists seriously, and that’s going to get a lot of people killed. Imagine these pro-life terrorists are all pissed off about the results of the upcoming election and think next year’s Superbowl is a mighty fine place to get some attention. I wouldn’t put it past them. These pro-life terrorists have been known to bomb sporting events in the past.

    It’s a good idea to remind people to these pro-life terrorist groups as much as possible. Thanks for consolidating some of the most recent movements and activities of the pro-life terrorist organizations. I will work on making some leaflets describing what pro-life terrorist groups are up to, and make it a point to remind others to how these pro-life terrorists operate. I may even go to mass to drop some off. Sort of non-discretely. Perhaps at coffee and donuts hour. The pro-life terrorists really should get more attention.

  16. I know my post above sounds a bit strange, but my point is… pro-life terrorists aren’t identified as such by society at large, and they really need to be.

  17. The FBI should designate the National Right to Life, Operation Rescue, Pro-Life Action Network, and other anti-choice fringe groups as terrorist organizations.

  18. You know, the more I think about it, and the more I read about the criminal activity of pro-life terrorists, it would also seem wise to educate people about our new anti-terrorism laws. Given that terrorist organizations aren’t exactly always forthcoming about their terrorist activities when they are recruiting and trying to get people to write them checks and stuff, couldn’t someone who was just anti-choice, but not a pro-life terrorist per se, wind up with all their assets seized and not be allowed to fly or leave the country based on their connections to known terrorists?

    I mean, if that were to happen. If they were to contribute to the activities of pro-life terrorists or pro-life terrorist organizations and these groups and/or people were to be found to be engaging in terrorist activity. I don’t know. The laws should be looked at and people should educate themselves and be very cautious when approached by or even talking with other anti-choice people or groups, in case some of these people are pro-life terrorists operating and organizing under the radar.

  19. The cop asks for his driver’s license; Newman refuses. He asks for his name and his birth date, and Newman gives them reluctantly, like a defiant kid busted for speeding. “Home address,” the cop says. “I’m not going to give that to you,” Newman says.

    Oh, isn’t that rich. Looks like Newman can dish it out but cannot take it.

    Perhaps a googlebombing is in order–linking his name, and OR, to the word terrorist?

  20. I would certainly think that would be an important contribution, Sheelzebub. People are very busy these days and don’t really have time to keep up with the activities of the pro-life terrorists. However, people are being fed confusing rhetoric and that leaves them vulnerable to inadvertently connecting themselves to violent and/or terrorist activities.

    I think the anti-choice groups that are law abiding really need to disassociate themselves from the prolife terrorist organizations in a way both the public at large and government agencies can identify and in a way that makes it harder for these prolife terrorist groups or individuals to network, recruit, and get financial support.

    By adopting the term “anti-choice,” law abiding anti-choice proponents will be credible in stating their political objective, which is to deny women and men reproductive choices. This makes sense when you consider their political initiatives: abstinence-only; anti-contraception; anti-women’s pregnancy-related and reproductive health services. It also disassociates them from the propaganda of prolife terrorist organizations. It acknowledges that the anti-choice proponents can and often do favor war, capital punishment, and machine gun ownership. It also acknowledges that anti-choice proponents don’t necessarily favor programs to provide aid to the poor, homeless, starving, dying, etc. So, it’s very clear to see that the term “pro-life” is a misnomer for the actual political agenda of the anti-choice movement and is instead useful propaganda for prolife terrorist organizations. At least, that’s how I see it. I think the anti-choice proponents really have a responsibility in the current atomosphere to show integrity and openness about their political agenda, both for their own safety with regard to new anti-terrorism laws and for the safety of American communities.

Comments are currently closed.