In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The GOP *hearts* racism

Conservatives tend to get up in arms when the Republican party is accused of racism, but given their behavior over the past few decades — and the continuance of that behavior right up until today — can anyone really argue that the GOP isn’t the party of race-hate? Bob Herbert has a great op/ed up today about the current and past racisms on the right. From disenfranchising black voters to refusing to hold debates that cover issues related to people of color, the GOP continues to appeal to it’s white, racist base. Not that this is anything new:

This is the party of the Southern strategy — the party that ran, like panting dogs, after the votes of segregationist whites who were repelled by the very idea of giving equal treatment to blacks. Ronald Reagan, George H.W. (Willie Horton) Bush, George W. (Compassionate Conservative) Bush — they all ran with that lousy pack.

Dr. Carolyn Goodman, a woman I was privileged to call a friend, died last month at the age of 91. She was the mother of Andrew Goodman, one of the three young civil rights activists shot to death by rabid racists near Philadelphia, Miss., in 1964.

Dr. Goodman, one of the most decent people I have ever known, carried the ache of that loss with her every day of her life.

In one of the vilest moves in modern presidential politics, Ronald Reagan, the ultimate hero of this latter-day Republican Party, went out of his way to kick off his general election campaign in 1980 in that very same Philadelphia, Miss. He was not there to send the message that he stood solidly for the values of Andrew Goodman. He was there to assure the bigots that he was with them.

“I believe in states’ rights,” said Mr. Reagan. The crowd roared.

In 1981, during the first year of Mr. Reagan’s presidency, the late Lee Atwater gave an interview to a political science professor at Case Western Reserve University, explaining the evolution of the Southern strategy:

“You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘Nigger, nigger, nigger,’ ” said Atwater. “By 1968, you can’t say ‘nigger’ — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things, and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.”

“States’ rights” is one of those dog-whistle phrases that Republicans use to rally their base. For the past few decades it’s been about segregation and racism; now it’s been expanded to include things like a state’s right to deny people equal marriage rights, and a state’s right to outlaw abortion access. “Welfare” is another one — Reagan’s Welfare Queen is still the first image that comes to mind when Republicans talk about social welfare policies. The implication, obviously, is that selfish, lazy and over-sexed black women are stealing the hard-earned money of good white folks everywhere, and using it to buy Cadillacs and jewelry while they refuse to work and “breed” like animals. “Dred Scott” is another — Bush has mentioned that case in several speeches, and it goes right over the heads of most moderates. In fact, it’s a message to his anti-choice base about fetal personhood — the Dred Scott case held that Americans of African descent could not claim citizenship. It’s one of the worst cases in U.S. history, and anti-choicers exploit it to argue that fetuses are unjustly denied citizenship the way that black Americans once were.

There are dozens of other dog-whistle phrases, and you can bet the current Republican candidates are well-versed in them. It doesn’t look like these guys are even pretending to care about voters of color. But they do care about rallying their base — even if that means relying on the same old racist methods they’ve always used.


20 thoughts on The GOP *hearts* racism

  1. First of all, three cheers for the death of TimesSelect.

    Second, it drives me nuts when relatively sane conservatives (sadly, I’m related to several) refuse to see the coded racism in their party’s rhetoric. Nice to see two op-ed pieces in as many days from the NYT pointing it out.

  2. “Dog whistle” phrases — I like that. Here in Northern Virginia, the dog-whistle phrases for getting rid of all those nasty brown immigrants linclude: “illegal boarding houses,” “gang activity,” and “social services for illegal immigrants.”

    I am so fucking sick and tired of the goddam white patriarchy.

  3. The entire concept of state’s rights scares the shit out of me. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that people are okay with giving rights to some and not to others based on geography– and then I realize that that’s the point.

  4. can anyone really argue that the GOP isn’t the party of race-hate?

    That’s like saying the Democrats are the party of political correctness. Actually, it’s kinda sad that even in the 21st century politics are still pretty much (or perhaps more than ever) a binary thing: bible thumping, conservative fascists vs hysterical pc leftsists.

    Oh and tinfoil hattie: while “white patriarchy” may have its (many) flaws, it sure as fuck beats non-white patriarchy, which is pretty much the only realistic alternative. Afaik no society of any significance has ever been a (true) matriarchy, and there’s probably a very good reason for that. It’s the male thirst for conquest, exploration & innovation that primarily drives progress — progress that ultimately benefits everyone, and in much more profound ways that ‘living peacefully and in harmony with nature’ ever could.

    Like it or not, even feminism and liberalism exist only by the grace of “white patriarchy”. Only in a fairly civilized, stable, technologically advanced society can people afford such (somewhat decadent) luxuries.

    See also http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3234
    (No, I’m not an Objectivist, but this is simply a great article. Short, sharp, to the point. Recommended reading for all pc, western culture-hating liberals).

  5. I always thought the significance of Dred Scott was just as a precedent for the SCOTUS completely overturning a prior ruling of the Court and being like “that was fucked up and wrong.” I hadn’t picked up on the significance of it being about recognizing oppressed people’s humanity. Good insight.

  6. The entire concept of state’s rights scares the shit out of me. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that people are okay with giving rights to some and not to others based on geography.

    Leaving aside the idea of “states rights” as a code word for Jim Crow policies, I think this is a pretty absurd reaction to the entire concept of states’ rights.

    The states’ abilities to spend their own education budgets, have state-wide income taxes, or enact state laws (like the California smoking ban, or Massachusetts’s move to legalize same-sex marriage, although that was through the judiciary and not through a legislative act) are both non-racist applications of states’ rights.

  7. That’s why state’s rights where the federal Constitution represents a floor rather than a ceiling for rights (i.e. the incorporation doctrine) is a good thing, and the George Wallace version is not.

  8. tinfoil hattie – I’m a Northern Virginian too, and holy Cheez Wiz is it ridiculous! I worked a campaign over the summer and did a whole lot of doorknocking, and if I had a quarter for every time I heard “I’m not a racist, but…” in relation to how the “aliens” are ruining our nice white society I’d be able to pay tuition. I mean, non-English speakers and non-whites were being blamed for EVERYTHING. Even things that weren’t…actually…happening. It makes me wonder, because so many people from SO many demographics were saying this – do they honestly not hear themselves to understand that yes, they actually are a bunch of bigoted xenophobes, or do they fully accept that bit of hatred and realize they’re using buzzwords to make it sound nicer for pollsters?

    It’s one of those things I legitimately don’t understand. Why should it bother me if not everyone speaks English, or whatever? The thing I hear most is that all the “aliens” are draining our welfare/health/education systems…but if we properly funded these things and made a decent quality of life available to all people instead of blowing money out the ass at a stupid war, then what would it matter? I get the problem of freeloaders, I really do. But when I have a (college educated) white man telling me he can’t find a (degree-required, white-collar) job because all of the (uneducated, non-English speaking) undocumented workers are taking those (unskilled, hard-labor) jobs from him, I want to beat my head against a wall.

  9. Like it or not, even feminism and liberalism exist only by the grace because of “white patriarchy”.

    Fixed.

    Go back under the bridge, troll…there may be some billygoats for you to gobble up.

  10. The entire concept of state’s rights scares the shit out of me. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that people are okay with giving rights to some and not to others based on geography– and then I realize that that’s the point.

    Like how you get free health care in Toronto, but not in Buffalo?

  11. So it’s not ok to be a feminist and a libertarian? Damn me and my love for individual freedom, no taxation and tiny government! Sorry, not trying to be a punkass, but come on. Not everyone who advocates state’s rights is a damned racist or “out to get you”. If you’d like an explanation feel free to hit me up on my bloggyo…I’m not rabid or anything, just bummed that my political views are weing slammed.
    And in response to “The entire concept of state’s rights scares the shit out of me..”, um. Hm. I think a huge, out of control, corporate-owned government should scare you a f**k of a lot more.

Comments are currently closed.