In defense of the sanctimonious women's studies set || First feminist blog on the internet

The Mask Slips, A Continuing Series

Every now and again, the mask slips and you see the real person underneath. And that person is quite often a racist or misogynist, despite protests to the contrary. Take Mel Gibson.

Now we have Senator George F. Allen of Virginia and his America:

“MY FRIENDS, we’re going to run this campaign on positive, constructive ideas,” Sen. George F. Allen told a rally of Republican supporters in Southwest Virginia last week. “And it’s important that we motivate and inspire people for something.” Whereupon Mr. Allen turned his attention to a young campaign aide working for his Democratic opponent — a University of Virginia student from Fairfax County who was apparently the only person of color present — and proceeded to ridicule him.

Let’s consider which positive, constructive or inspirational ideas Mr. Allen had in mind when he chose to mock S.R. Sidarth of Dunn Loring, who was recording the event with a video camera on behalf of James Webb, the Democratic nominee for the Senate seat Mr. Allen holds. The idea that holding up minorities to public scorn in front of an all-white crowd will elicit chortles and guffaws? (It did.) The idea that a candidate for public office can say “Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia!” to an American of Indian descent and really mean nothing offensive by it? (So insisted Mr. Allen’s aides.) Or perhaps the idea that bullying your opponents and calling them strange names — Mr. Allen twice referred to Mr. Sidarth as “Macaca” — is within the bounds of decency on the campaign trail?

“Macaca” is indeed a strange name, but it’s one well-known to a certain type of person — you know, the kind who runs around in bedsheets:

The term ‘macaque’–also pronounced ‘mukakkah’–is a commonly used racial slur on par with the word ‘nigger’ in the united states.

In Europe, the word ‘macaque’ is largely a racial slur used to insult people of North African descent. It is roughly synonomous with ‘dirty arab.’

Most of the results that came back in these searches took me to well known white supremacy websites–and to posts from the past two or three years. So this is a phrase that is still in use.

Also returned where hundreds of ‘ethnic slur’ dictionaries online, all of which list this term as a ‘Belgian’ racial slur.

Not that Allen, who had staunchly opposed a state holiday honoring MLK, acknowledged that this was his intent. No, he was just making fun of Sidarth’s haircut and somehow this obscure term used on Stormfront just popped out of his mouth:

Reached Monday evening, Allen said that the word had no derogatory meaning for him and that he was sorry. “I would never want to demean him as an individual. I do apologize if he’s offended by that. That was no way the point.”

Asked what macaca means, Allen said: “I don’t know what it means.” He said the word sounds similar to “mohawk,” a term that his campaign staff had nicknamed Sidarth because of his haircut. Sidarth said his hairstyle is a mullet — tight on top, long in the back.

Ah, the weasel-word apology: I apologize IF he was offended. Otherwise, not.

However, Sidarth got the message loud and clear:

But the apology, which came hours after Allen’s campaign manager dismissed the issue with an expletive and insisted the senator has “nothing to apologize for,” did little to mollify Webb’s campaign or Sidarth, who said he suspects Allen singled him out because his was the only nonwhite face among about 100 Republican supporters.

“I think he was doing it because he could, and I was the only person of color there, and it was useful for him in inciting his audience,” said Sidarth, who videotaped the event for the Webb campaign. “I was annoyed he would use my race in a political context.”

Allen plans to run for President in 2008. Welcome to America, indeed.


51 thoughts on The Mask Slips, A Continuing Series

  1. This reminded me of an incident that occurred during the 2004 Senate race in South Dakota. Dick Wadhams is George Allen’s campaign manager. He also managed John Thune’s campaign. Back in 2004 someone was videotaping a Thune event for Daschle’s campaign and Dick Wadhams approached to berate this person. At the time the Thune campaign was accusing Daschle of debate ducking so the tirade was along the lines of “Do you know your boss is a coward? Do you?” It made the papers and everything.

    I wonder if DickWad(hams) instructs his candidates on the art of harassing the guy with the video camera.

  2. It does sound an awful lot more like he’s mocking the opponent’s employee following him everywhere with a video camera. Play it the other way. All black audience, black candidate, white videographer, candidate calls him Skippy or Troy. No story. Get over it.

  3. Oh Sweet Jesus, we’re now getting entirely hyperthetical reverse racism charges getting thrown around to excuse the use of blatant racist language? By the third comment?

    Sweet Chocolate Cthulhu, how many babies do we have to sacrifice to your soft caramel center to keep your trolly minions away!?

  4. “Play it the other way. All black audience, black candidate, white videographer, candidate calls him Skippy or Troy. No story.”

    I think it’d be just the opposite. You’d get a pile of stories about reverse racism and those crazy black people who hate all white people, and the candidate would be totally discredited.

  5. Not to mention, calling a white guy Skippy or Troy is hardly the equivalent of calling a South Asian guy by a slur that compares him to a monkey.

  6. This guy’s from Virginia and he doesn’t recognize “business in the front, party in the back”? I smell a weakness in this argument.

    (NB: Besides the obvious, of course. Mockery is intended here.)

  7. I lurve the idea that an using a racial slur at an all-white gathering is the same as calling someone Skippy or Troy at an all-black one. (And I’m vaguely amused by the idea that Troy is a stereotypically white name, because I’ve known two guys named Troy, and they’re both black.) It’s kind of like saying that the Klan is akin to the NAACP.

    I hate to say this, but I don’t think it will hurt Allen. Anyone who would mind probably wouldn’t vote for him anyway.

  8. I’m not trolling, I’m here everyday. My point is not that reverse racism is not ok, it is that this wasn’t racism nor would it be if similar language was used in a reverse situation. The guy is from the enemy camp. Why shouldn’t he be made fun of? His job is to videotape speeches so the opponent can pull sentences out and distort them in the political nonsense we call elections. I’m sure Allen has a guy that does it too. Sounds like this gy stood up front, had been, and it was obvious he was a plant for the other side. So he got picked on. Big deal.

  9. The guy is from the enemy camp. Why shouldn’t he be made fun of?

    Making fun of him is fine by me. I’d have done it too. But I certainly wouldn’t have called a person of colour a Macaca. If he knows what it means, it seems pretty clear he’s a racist. If he doesn’t know what it means, it seems pretty clear he’s a fool. Either way, it doesn’t look good for Allen.

  10. Mr. from Minnesota, it’s the way he was picked on. It’s the difference between someone here just arguing with you for your opinion on this piece, and someone calling you a white-male privileged Midwestern hick, and dismissing you on the basis of your gender and alleged location.

  11. Didn’t Allen get a long profile in the New Republic a couple months ago talking about how he has no sense of appropriateness racially? If i remember, it talked about how he spent a lot of his high school/early college years playing at being a confederate supporter because he though it was cool…I’ll have to check on it. I think I still have the magazine at home.

  12. Yes he did. 5/8 issue, available to subscribers only, of course…but he really comes off as a complete and utter idiot…almost more of a privledged asshole who doesn’t really have a clear understanding of how ridiculously inappropriate he is than racist (though certainly that too), if you can believe it. I kept going ‘oh my god!’ and having to explain the ridiculous stuff I was reading to my boyfriend when I read the article.

  13. Wow, rabbit. I dug up that article, and, just, wow. His sister wrote a book about how Allen would beat up and physically torment her and other family members. And his response was that it was the perspective of the youngest sibling, “who was a girl.”

  14. Mr. from Minnesota, if you had been working for Alan Keyes and taping Barack Obama’s campaign speeches, would it have been ok for Obama to call you a cracker?

  15. You know what I really love? How what -could- have been said suddenly displaces -what was actually said.-

    Hypothetically speaking, if my aunt had testicles, she’d be my uncle. Maybe.

    So the fuck what? The insult is racist; the guy is a weaselly racist POS (and yes, virginia, being against the MLK holiday, the cultural makeup of the audience in question, these factors all count here. yes). Next?

  16. I’ve since found out, while following this story around the blogs, that Allen’s mother is a white colonial woman from Tunisia. So he knows very well this insult that the French colonials might have hurled at the natives.

  17. I’d have laughed my ass off if someone called me a cracker to be perfectly honest. If they called attention to the fact that I was the only white guy in the room after I had been following them for days with a camera and put myself up front it wouldn’t surprise me a bit. Listen, I get that name calling and racial issues are different. I get that belonging to a priveledged/powered group means the words have less histroical or potentially painful punch in the exact same situation, so how I would feel would not be the same as the way this guy felt. I just think he’s acting like a wuss.

  18. Mr., calling a white guy at an all black rally “Skippy” is like calling an Indian guy at an all white rally “Ram”, like calling a hispanic guy “Jose.” (and not even, because reverse racism just lacks the punch-in-the-gut power of racism of the majority against the minority: it simply is not possible to dehumanize someone by pointing out their whiteness). Calling him a monkey or a macaque is a slur, not differentiable from dropping the N-bomb. Would you say it was no story is he had said it in English: called him “that monkey back there”? Of course that would be a story. So let’s not pretend that using a foreign word that Allen falsely believed would serve as a dog-whistle for his own kind makes his conduct any better than if he had said it in English.

  19. I get that belonging to a priveledged/powered group means the words have less histroical or potentially painful punch in the exact same situation, so how I would feel would not be the same as the way this guy felt. I just think he’s acting like a wuss.

    I don’t get this at all. You seem to understand that what Allen said was genuinely offensive, but then you go on to say that Sidarth should just suck it up because complaining about racism makes someone a “wuss.” So, what, we should just let this jackass get away with it? We should shut up and let it go because racism is no big deal?

  20. I say he’s acting like a wuss because who cares what Allen says. People say things. Is it holding him down? Did he not get into college? Did he not get the job because of this. No. There is so much racism doing actual damage to people every day and you choose to focus on this incident and he chooses to call attention to himself for this? It’s a joke and he’s a joke for being upset about it. This is exactly what defocuses the discussion from actual problems.

  21. belledame222 – The answer is none. Be a man and stop crying to newspapers because someone says something you don’t like. Call me whatever you want. I won’t run and tell mommy.

  22. I say he’s acting like a wuss because who cares what Allen says.

    The man is a US Senator. And, I’m willing to bet, he was one of the people who voted against extending the Voting Rights Act. He has a vote on judicial appointments, who can make law regarding race-based discrimination.

    It fucking well matters what he says.

  23. Be a man and stop crying to newspapers because someone says something you don’t like.

    He didn’t cry to the newspapers, you idiot — the newspapers were there. As were video cameras other than Sidarth’s.

  24. So Mr., in order to be disturbed that our political leaders are allied with white supremacists, exactly how powerful do they have to be? Governor of a populous State (as Allen was)? A Senator (as he is)? A candidate for President? Or is it no biggie unless he is Dictator for Life?

  25. Uh huh. Complaining about being called a racist slur=wussy. But you bitching and moaning about the story coverage (on two separate sites)=totally manly.

    I mean: why are you choosing to focus on this particular story? Is the fact that this story’s being covered holding you down somehow? Aren’t you lot supposed to be more stoic? Butch up, man!

  26. zuzu – He’s quoted in the article, whining like a little girl. That’s crying to the newspapers sweetheart.

    “Alilied with white supremacists” is exactly the problem with this whole discussion. He said something, he’s not forming PAC’s with David Duke. The leap from a quote to “Allied with white supremacists” is exactly why you will never make progess on this kind of stuff. You turn nothing into this guy is Hitler. Staring at your navel makes it hard to see thre road. What’s that Billy Joel song? Oh yeah, Running on Ice.

    belle, while I am sure i am not as butchy as you, I’ll hold my own in most circles and look at the bigger picture.

  27. Mr., he’s got a well-documented love of the Confederacy, at a time when openly worshipping it (particularly for someone who grew up in California) meant that one was opposed to civil rights for blacks.

    Moreover, his mother was a French woman who grew up in Tunisia, where the word was used as a racial slur — by the French — against North Africans. So she would have been well aware of the racial implications of the word, as would he.

    Try doing a little reading on the subject; you’ll find a start here.

    And I don’t see how you can see the statement of Sidarth that he was “annoyed” by the statement as “crying to the newspapers.” Or even “whining.” Of course, he did one better, by taking the videotape back to the Webb campaign, who have a very good chance of sinking Allen’s current campaign as well as his 2008 Presidential bid. And here you are, pissing and moaning impotently on a blog that it’s no big deal.

    And don’t call me sweetheart. Mmkay, sugartits?

  28. But it’s different when mr. minnesota whines and cries, see, cause he’s a real man, so his whining and crying is privileged whining and crying and we should respect it.

    Don’t you bitches and homos and people of color get these rules yet?

  29. There is so much racism doing actual damage to people every day and you choose to focus on this incident and he chooses to call attention to himself for this?

    Um, yes. That’s kind of the entire POINT of fighting racism–focusing on it wherever you find it, whether it’s someone at the next table in a restaurant talking about “India’s nigger problem” (I actually heard this the other day) or a senator who’s campaigning for reelection spouting a racial slur at an opponent.*

    I’m tired of hearing, “This isn’t a big deal, so don’t write about it.” It’s not an either-or situation. People can write about all kinds of things. Writing about one thing does not preclude them from writing about other things. Posting photos of cats does not preclude them from waxing philosophical on the “bigger picture.”

    If this upsets you, Mr. from MN, then go to http://www.blogger.com and start your own blog. But if all you want to do is whine about other bloggers who are writing things that you personally don’t consider important, you’re wasting your time.

    * Seems to me that politicians should be above personal attacks in general. Wouldn’t you think that elected officials should be more respectful of others than the general public? But I guess I should know better than to expect more from senators like Allen. Clearly they have nothing better to do than throw insults around.

  30. delagar – Here’s the difference between my “bitching”. It’s not about me. It’s about effective strategies to move forward on topics like racism in this country vs being think skinned babies and looking for every situation a person of color is in and then blaming the wind blowing there on racism. And don’t put slurs in my mouth. If I wanted to call anyone here the names you write down I will. But again, nice tactic. Create quotes for me to dismiss dissenting, correct opinons from the norm here.

    And zuzu, honeydrawers, my dad grew up in Germany. I don’t know the racial slur for Hispanics in German. It’s all leaps for you. No facts, just leaps. Ummm, anyone here take logic in college? Anyone? (sound of crickets….)

  31. Dear M&M: As a matter of fact, I’m rather on the femmey side. But you are cordially invited to suck my tampon. Doily and lace-trimmed kneepads entirely optional.

  32. A man who worshipped the confederacy in his youth for white-supremacist-affiliation reasons used a racial slur whose definition he almost certainly knew on the only person of color at a rally. But it’s illogical to argue that he was being racist?

  33. My favorite response was from Rob Cordry on The Daily Show:

    “I don’t know what ‘macaca’ means, but it sure as fuck sounds racist.”

  34. Pingback: ymzpzrzmlm
  35. Pingback: xyukuiwzpo
  36. Pingback: xbjubezsqtk
  37. Pingback: valium
  38. Plus, even if he really did mean to say “mohawk” and his mother wasn’t french-tunisian, (which, hello? he totally knew what he was saying!) he said “WELCOME TO AMERICA AND THE REAL WORLD OF VIRGINIA” to a native Virginian, and based his assumption that the guy was in need of said welcome on skin color alone.

  39. Pingback: mp3 download
  40. Pingback: dildo
  41. Pingback: pantie

Comments are currently closed.